THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View 172 September 24 - 30, 2001 |
||
FOR BOOKS OF THE MONTH 1994-Present Click HERE Last Week's View Next Week's View If you are not paying for this place, click here... Highlights this week:
This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. (Older columns here.) For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. For Previous Weeks of the View, SEE VIEW HOME PAGE Search: type in string and press return.
|
||
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here.
The atomz Search returns: Search: type in string and press return. The freefind search remains:
|
This week: | Monday
September 24, 2001
Lots of mail, and most of what I have to say is in response to it. I'm trying to write. Organizing for war is difficult and particularly so when you have no clear idea of on whom you are to make war. Still some of the domestic security efforts seem senseless. Others are designed to try to preserve some notion of equality while ensuring safety: a very difficult task. Profiling is attractive to police because it works. It is hardly foolproof, but if you are going to use a sampling system -- and you pretty well have to -- you want to make efficient use of limited resources, particularly if you are going to confine security to professionals and not involve the public. Oddly enough, using the public as a militia may be a far better way to preserve liberty and equality than trying to use "professionals" and requiring them to "treat everyone equally." It is a dilemma of real proportions. We have also begun the idiocy. One can hope that there are a few adults around to catch people on this. http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257 tells of proposed legislation: NEWS Hackers face life imprisonment under 'Anti-Terrorism' Act Justice Department proposal classifies most computer crimes as acts of terrorism. By Kevin Poulsen Sep 23 2001 11:00PM PT Hackers, virus-writers and web site defacers would face life imprisonment without the possibility of parole under legislation proposed by the Bush Administration that would classify most computer crimes as acts of terrorism. The Justice Department is urging Congress to quickly approve its Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), a twenty-five page proposal that would expand the government's legal powers to conduct electronic surveillance, access business records, and detain suspected terrorists. What are they thinking of? So: we have no declaration of war, but we will finish ourselves off as a free country. I have been informed by my web service that we are getting far too much volume on this site. That means a lot of people are downloading a lot of stuff. That is good -- but it also means I am going to have to PAY MORE. Which means I need more subscribers or I need to get some advertisements. I don't want advertisements. So: if you have been thinking about subscribing, this is a good time...
|
This week: | Tuesday, September
25, 2001
A new virus warning: Roland sent me this warning. Heads up... http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010924/tc/tech_votevirus_dc_1.html SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Security experts on Monday warned of a brand new virus masquerading as a program that will allow people to vote whether the United States should go to war over the deadly Sept. 11 hijacker attacks, but which deletes computer files instead. The ``Vote Virus'' is spreading via e-mail to users of Microsoft Corp.'s (Nasdaq:MSFT - news) Outlook e-mail program, said Simon Perry, vice president of security solutions at Computer Associates International Inc. (NYSE:CA - news) The virus appears with the subject line: ``Peace between America and Islam!'' It is claimed that the shameful treatment of returning Viet Nam vets is a myth. I have this from Ed Hume, psychiatrist: Jerry I'm sure some of your readers have first-hand opinions, but as a shrink I must say that some of my patients who are 'Nam vets have reported being spat on back in the US. One I discharged last week had a number of troubling experiences in VN (fighting fires on two aircraft carriers, being in the Saigon post office when it was blown up, being ambushed . . . ) and back in the US: being kicked out of a taxicab when the driver discovered he was a VN vet, and, oh yes, being spat on. And I don't work at a VA hospital. Those were sad, bad, shameful times. Myth my ass. Ed It is time to recall that Viet Nam was, in fact, a campaign of attrition in the Seventy Years War -- and was a US victory, despite what we thought at the time. See my short piece of a year ago. Isn't it time to fire the entire top layer of every single one of our "Intelligence" organizations? I mean, what more evidence of total incompetence could we have? The FBI gave us WACO, and was so busy protecting its "elite" Hostage "Rescue" group that it missed every single clue. As for instance: Inquiries Reported On Crop-Duster Loan http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19569-2001Sep24.html By Rick Weiss and Justin Blum Washington Post Staff Writers Tuesday, September 25, 2001; Page A12 The man who the FBI believes flew an American Airlines plane into the World Trade Center Sept. 11 apparently walked into a U.S. Department of Agriculture office in Florida last year and asked about a loan to buy a crop-duster plane. Employees told the man that the department does not offer such loans, and referred him to a local private lender, according to a bank president whose security chief was briefed by the FBI. It appears the man did visit that lender and made further inquiries about a crop-duster loan, but there is no record that he applied for one, according to Robert Epling, president of Community Bank of Florida. Now I know it is politically incorrect to be suspicious of someone who looks and talks like a Middle East terrorist just because he does suspicious things, and that the Clinton administration would have fired any agents who did politically incorrect things (as opposed to burning citizens alive); but apparently no one had the courage to step up and say, Look, there are a lot of strange people doing strange things. We have a man in prison who wanted to crash an airplane into the CIA headquarters. We have others who wanted to blow up the World Trade Center. They are all from the same part of the world. Couldn't these be in a, excuse the expression, conspiracy? Maybe I am just having a bad morning. I have a Linux box with a Green Screen: Linette, and new and hardware stable Linux box with Red Hat, has a green screen with patterns on it and nothing I can do will get it to respond. When I went to best last night it had a Gnome desktop on it. I guess I will have to pull the plug... Lars & Amy Olander [mailto:lolander@optonline.net] Please stop sending me copies of the SirCam virus. I now have 35 of them from you, and that is quite enough. The cost of running Microsoft and IIS has risen to the point that Gartner is recommending companies move away from it until Microsoft addresses IIS security problems with a full re-write: <http://www3.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=340962&acsFlg=accessBought> Pete Flugstad I tend to agree. And I am very weary of getting various worms and Trojans through Outlook. None have infected my system, but that doesn't mean one won't eventually. Sigh. Thanks a whole bunch, Norton I updated Norton Anti-virus this morning. I shouldn't have. Norton anti-virus has changed all my mail accounts for Outlook so that I can't connect to the servers any longer. It whangoed itself and poproxy stopped working, and when that dies then you can't get email. I can send email but never send it. So I had to go through manually and set things to go to my mail servers. I don't know if MacAfee has the same problems, but ever since I did the Norton update this morning, Norton has been trying to drive me mad. I sent a virus warning to subscribers last night. If you subscribed before yesterday and you did not get the message, please tell me: I am going to eliminate a lot of addresses that got bounced. My thanks to the new subscribers and those who renewed last night and this morning. |
This week: |
Wednesday, September
26, 2001
This will be a busy day. Friday the satellite people will be here to give me some bandwidth. This will be a temporary measure. The Phone Company says DSL in my neighborhood by February, and Adelphia says the same thing about cable modem. Meanwhile I do these silly things so you don't have to. I may keep dialup for Everquest: Alex tells me that the latency will be truly bad on the satellite. We will see. My plan is to leave the dialup system in place, and tell the machine I play Everquest on to look to the Netwinder for its primary gateway; all the others will get the new box. I can put up with a 2 second delay after I ask for a web page if I then get it quickly, as opposed to now, where it might start downloading faster but I can go shave while the whole page comes in. And more and more places are clearly contemptuous of the bandwidth impaired, making pages that take FOREVER to download, and of course sending the highly complex advertisements before they send anything I want to see. Which is why this place is paid for by subscriptions, and I don't have ads, and with any luck I never will. As to subscribers, I got a number of new subscriptions and renewals this week. Thanks. I also sent a mailing, and many of the addresses bounced. I am checking those addresses: if the bounced mail comes from someone not a current subscriber, I am going to remove that name from the subscriber list. If you did not get the Virus warning this week, and you are a current subscriber, NOW is the time to tell me when, how, and under what name you subscribed! Today I will be building a new ATHLON system to be the primary gateway machine for the new satellite. It will run Windows 2000 Professional, but I have in mind two additional measures. One, I will be looking into various NON-Microsoft mail handlers that run under Windows. There are a number of these, and few have the security holes Microsoft has -- in part of course because there are fewer people looking for holes in them. Second, Roland and Dan and other advisors are confident we can stream the satellite bitstream through a Windows box -- the satellite people say the optimizing software runs under Windows but not Linux -- into a Linux box where it will get new security treatment. The first pass should eliminate a lot of spam and most simple virus attacks through running standard commercial software. The Linux box ought to get the rest. This looks to be a new adventure in communications. For the next few hours I will accepting suggestions for names for the new Athlon box whose primary mission will be to process communications through the new satellite system we're installing. THANKS!! We have names enough already...
Most of the story will go into the column, but some will be here, and subscribers will get a report by email as the first mailing through the mail handling software I'll be installing... It is time to do some serious strategic analysis of the war effort, both military operations and domestic security. We started on that earlier; now it is time to be more systematic, and apply a strategy of technology to the problem at hand. I'll start that effort shortly. You should be thinking along those lines. This readership includes a large number of the people who ought to be thinking about this, and some of those who have inputs at appropriate levels. We are a sort of unofficial think tank, and we can pass ideas into the official system. How much attention is paid there isn't clear: it's not like the Reagan days, or even when I was Mr. Gingrich's science advisor. Still, there are channels, and I get email from rather surprising places. Understand, I want to keep things this way: I do not want and would not accept any official position, and I haven't had a security clearance in years. I am in the enviable position of having no position: some ( I like to think the more intelligent ) people listen to me, but no one has any obligation to do anything I say. I can only try to be persuasive... In any event we will begin a new strategic analysis shortly. Begin with objectives: What do we want to DO? Begin with Afghanistan:
Those are some of the possible objectives. They will control our strategy. If we want to feed people, where? In the Hindu Kush? Kabul? All of Pakistan? If we want to change the world there, do we want to impose democracy on Afghanistan? On Pakistan? On all the other Stans? And we are hardly through with this inventory. We need to look at the Middle East, and indeed most of the world. What do we want it to look like when we are done? Begin with ideals: what, ideally, would we want to see? Recall that democracies may discover they don't like us, despite our conviction that democracies don't go to war with each other. What do we want to see in the world? I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS REAL OR A HOAX: (LATER: it is a hoax. REPEAT: the following is a hoax.)
>Subject: FW: WARNING - PLEASE READ Subject: Warning - Do Not Open Blue Envelopes in your U.S. Mail ONCE YOU HAVE READ THIS PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL YOU KNOW. This is from Schwab corporate headquarters - so it's no joke. Very scary. Be careful Just when you thought you were safe, now we have the following to deal with...please read, it definitely is a serious threat to our lives and health. This is an alert about a virus in the original sense of the word...one that affects your body, not your hard drive. There have been 23 confirmed cases of people attacked by the Klingerman Virus, a virus that arrives in your real mailbox, not your e-mail in box. Someone has been mailing large blue envelopes, seemingly at random, to people inside the US. On the front of the envelope in bold black letters is printed, "A gift for you from the Klingerman Foundation." When the envelopes are opened, there is a small sponge sealed in plastic. This sponge carries what has come to be known as the Klingerman Virus, as public health officials state this is a strain of virus they have not previously encountered. When asked for comment, Florida police Sergeant Stetson said, "We are working with the CDC and the USPS, but have so far been unable to track down the origins of these letters. The return addresses have all been different, and we are certain a remailing service is being used, making our jobs that much more difficult." Those who have come in contact with the Klingerman Virus have been hospitalized with severe dysentery. So far seven of the twenty-three victims have died. There is no legitimate Klingerman Foundation mailing unsolicited gifts. If you receive an oversized blue envelope in the mail marked "A gift from the Klingerman foundation". DO NOT open it. Place it in a strong plastic bag or container and call the police immediately. The "Gift" is one you definitely do not want to open. 0 PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU CARE ABOUT. Mrs. Sandra Dee McNair-Boyd Social Work Secretary Yale New Haven Hospital Department of Social Work 203-688-2256 Bonnie Pote WorkForce Solutions Supplier Management Division 908-221-3467 You now know what I know. I have no more information. http://www.snopes2.com/toxins/klinger.htm Recommend checking this site http://www.snopes2.com/ A good source for hoax information, unless its about computer viruses, in which case Symantec seems to be the best site for info. Tom Brosz Apparently it was a hoax. Which is not astonishing.
|
This week: |
Thursday,
September 27, 2001 I was up until all hours being on an east coast radio morning show, so I may not make much sense. Regarding the thing last night: Dear Jerry: I'm surprised at you! "Sgt. Stetson" wasn't a giveaway? "Sandra Dee" Blah Blah? "Bonnie Pote" AKA "Potty" as in potty training? Max Klinger of the M.A.S.H. series, which had lots of bathroom humor, and the "Klingerman" virus? I know you get tons of mail and it must be hard to read it all with care, but this one was loaded with hints that it was fake. It's a scary and paranoid time enough right now. All the best-- Tim Loeb Stetson is a reasonably common name. As it happens, for the first ten years we lived here Jamie Farr was a two-doors-down neighbor. Then came MASH. Jamie had been in Blackboard Jungle -- he's the halfwit kid with glasses -- and had been trying to make a living acting for a long time. MASH and Corporal Klinger did it. He said, as he moved from here to Hidden Hills where the big successes go, "If I'd known I could get rich putting on a dress I'd have done that a long time ago..." Actually I never did understand why he wanted to move. This is the best village in Los Angeles. But again it is not an uncommon name. You will note I prefaced it with a warning before I put it up, and in fact I posted that at a time when not many people would be around: it was not up twenty minutes before I got the correction. And better safe than sorry. Alas, junk mail might not be all that bad a way to distribute an infectious agent. Chemical and Germ warfare isn't terribly easy -- but it is made a lot easier if you don't worry about the survival of your vectoring troops, and they don't intend to survive anyway. It's not entirely easy to generate lethal agents, and it's even harder to vector them properly. Those madmen in Japan discovered that, having spent a couple of million bucks on the effort and making the attempt in as crowded a city as exists in the First World. For all that they killed under a score of people. On the other hand the Russians managed several thousand people and more animals in an accidental release of a biological agent from their development labs. Given enough resources and some time undisturbed, particularly if you have a government behind you, CBW is a real threat. I make no apologies for posting that. At worst it meant watching your mail. I have had several complaints about my remarks on programming in BYTE. One of the letters and a lengthy answer is in mail. Also in mail is an interesting piece on Rats, Men, and Cats by Greg Cochran. The Grand Prize. Whatever happens, we have got I wrote this in another forum and it was intended to be provocative, even incendiary; but I wonder if it is not essentially true? The proper thing to do with the USAF is abolish it as a failed experiment. Give over its strategic bombing to a USAAF within the Department of War, and give over support of the Field Army to the Army. There are also functions that the Navy needs. Now it's true enough that air transport in general might be enough to justify a Service; but USAF considers that beneath itself, as it does close support of the field army. Hell even air superiority as I understand the term is not important any more: rather zoom around with fighters swatting one hornet at a time than to take out their bases. It used to be that air superiority meant I can fly and you can't. Now it means I can shoot you down as you come up. Swatting one hornet at a time. And protection and support of the field army is a mission no one in USAF wants. Materiel and air transport aren't important either. Abolish the silly thing as a bad experiment and go back to War and Navy. For discussion on this see mail. John Keegan has an excellent op-ed in the Telegraph. See mail.
|
This week: |
Friday,
September 28, 2001 I have letters from two readers who really and truly resent Greg Cochran's piece about cats, rats, and men, but they contain no information other than accusations that Cochran must hate cats, and there is no evidence of "mind control" by microorganisms. The first assertion is not true, and neither is the second: in the insect world there are astonishing instances of "mind control", with insects exposing themselves to certain death by predators if and only if they are infected. I recall Niven and I listening in fascination while Jack Cohen sat here in my study and told us of such cases, and I had at one time several books on the subject as well as many journal reprints. Those familiar with BEOWULF'S CHILDREN will immediately see the use we put to those lectures. Documented mammalian cases are a bit less common. The satellite people are coming today. They called to say so. Hurrah! Actually they are here. The dish is up. The wiring is yet to be done.
Well, we have satellite communications. Installation was easy enough once the wiring was done, although there are cautions, as for instance don't have a modem in the system you want to do satellite connections to: the Earthlink package found the built-in modem on the system and wouldn't believe there was a USB satellite connection. I had to nuke that, physically remove the little modem and uninstall its software, after which all went exactly as it should have. No other machines connect through that one to the net: I am connected through dialup for this. Latency is bad. Once it starts a download, though, it screams. More later, when I get other machines working through that one.
|
This week: | Saturday,
September 29, 2001 It works. I have quite fast communications. I haven't integrated it all into my system, and the machine stays off most of the time until I get the security stuff installed, but it works. All about it in the upcoming column. Last night we went to the Hollywood Bowl, where they searched our bags before we could get in. A rather meaningless precaution, and they overlooked one cased set of binoculars which might have contained anything. I presume the notion was to make people feel better. Real security isn't going to be attained this way: if someone were determined to enter the Hollywood Bowl with a weapon, or explosives, it would be easy enough. When we came out the headlines on USA Today on display said "US and British Special Operations Units in operating in Afghanistan." I haven't read the morning papers here, but there's nothing hopping on the radio this morning, so I don't know more about it. It's hardly surprising. But once again: if we are going to be invading people, shouldn't there be a declaration of war? We can put up with wartime restrictions in the US: but these permanent measures, endless surrenders of freedom that won't really do any good, are a bad thing indeed. Declare war now. If you don't know on whom, I will give you a pair: the Taliban Government of Afghanistan, Iraq, and the bin Laden "non-governmental organization." The war aim is Unconditional Surrender. As to what shall we do with Afghanistan afterwards, we can worry about that when the nation has surrendered. Presumably we recognize a new government and help it along. As to Iraq, it is about time we finished off that regime and installed a government we can live with. Even a restoration of the old Hashemite royalty (kin to the present King of Jordan) would be preferable to Saddam Hussein, and would presumably be acceptable to Saudi Adabia and others over there. We don't need to replace the bin Laden organization.
I will probably take the day off tomorrow, so don't be concerned. I have done some non-systematic thoughts on the Black September War which for the moment are in mail. This all need consolidation. But there's only one of me... And we are taking precautions against the wrong attacks. They have pretty well done the "turn passenger jets into cruise missiles" attack. Think of the next ones, don't just concentrate on stopping something that won't happen again (if for no other reason than that pilots, air crew, and passengers now know NOT to cooperate with hijackers). I need to do several essays on that; meanwhile, think about it: what might they have planned 2 years ago to do now? Did they have any plan to exploit success on the scale they achieved? Or was this a "try six targets, we aren't very good at this, maybe we get one or two."?
Tom Lynch your mail is bouncing. And I put this in another place in response to what we might have done in the Gulf War once uprisings began in Iraq. It was contended that the Saudis and Turks would have really been unhappy and we would have had no base to operate from: I think the Turks could have been brought around. Saudi no. As to Kuwait, I would have occupied the place and told the Royal Family "You are eligible to stand for election. Your country is now a Constitutional Monarchy. Here is your Constitution. Have a nice day." That would have given us a secure base without regard to what the Saudis thought. "You asked for our help. You got it. But we are the friends of liberty everywhere, and restoring a gang of cowardly thugs who hid in London while we recovered their country is not part of the US charter. "Have a nice day." I think I believe this. I haven't totally thought it through. No matter. It didn't happen. And now I am going to go do other things for a while.
|
This week: | Sunday,
As promised, I took the day off.
|