THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View 161 July 9 - 15, 2001 |
||
FOR BOOKS OF THE MONTH 1994-Present Click HERE Last Week's View Next Week's View Highlights this week:
This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. (Older columns here.) For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. If you are not paying for this place, click here... For Previous Weeks of the View, SEE VIEW HOME PAGE Search: type in string and press return.
|
||
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here.
The atomz Search returns: Search: type in string and press return. The freefind search remains:
|
This week: | Monday
July 9, 2001
I am hard at work on the column which I should finish shortly. I just heard NPR say, breathlessly, that a study shows that more ballots are miscast and not counted in precincts where there are poor people than in other voting districts. Duh. While there are lots of reasons to be poor, including bad luck, the term "unsuccessful" probably encompasses most of them. If we had to govern a large nation by the votes of the successful or the unsuccessful which would you choose? This does not mean one ought to go to extraordinary means to keep the votes of the unsuccessful from counting, nor should they be unrepresented. Consent of the governed means just that, and poor districts need law and community resources, often more than wealthy districts do (cause and effect need not be debated) so they need sufficient representation that they can't be ignored in the allocation of community resources; but one need not make an extraordinary effort to count their votes either. The best way to ensure consent of the governed is to put government power as close to those governed as possible, which means decentralization of power; but so long as we are going to concentrate power far away from us, inviting the least successful members of the community to control the society is not all that great an idea to begin with, and taking extraordinary measures to "ensure that every vote counts and is counted" is no more than political demagoguery by people who know better. Do have a look at Macauley's speeches on copyright.
|
This week: | Tuesday, July
10
This day was devoured by locusts
|
This week: |
Wednesday, July
11 2001
Going down to the beach house to write. More stuff tonight.
Well, I didn't make that. Pleasant visit with The Grandchild.
|
This week: |
Thursday,
July 12, 2001 With luck I will get some fiction done today. Ruminations tonight.
|
This week: |
Friday,
July 13, 2001 At the beach. Working, sort of, and reading Cryptonomichron, which is a very odd book, excellent in places and so badly paced as to make you want to throw it away. But I don't, so it must be pretty well done.
|
This week: | Saturday,
July 14 2001 Vive La France More or less. I can't say the French are particularly friendly to the US. On the other hand they have shown what you can do with nuclear power.
|
This week: | Sunday,
July 15, 2001 Quite a lot of interesting mail posted today. And of course there is something wrong with my connection to my mail server for jerrypournelle.com. Why not? One more darned thing to distract me. I think these computers hate me. Why can't things just work?
|