THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View: June 7 - 13, 1999 |
|
This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. Previous Weeks of The View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
|
|
Previous Weeks of The View:
|
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
Boiler Plate: If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here. The LINUX pages are organized as the log, my queries, and your responses and advice parts one, two, three, and four. There's four pages because I try to keep download times well under a minute. There are new updates to four. Highlights this week:
|
This week: | Monday,
June 7, 1999 Continued attempts to get this page working in a place that supports the real Front Page Extensions so that the search works. Not getting too far. More later. It's column deadline day. Lots in the column. Apologies to subscribers: have been spending my time trying to keep my head above water. Not doing so well with it. So it goes.
A week or so ago we had a visit from Bob Gleason, my editor at TOR books. He and Niven and I went hiking up in the nature preserve above my house. That's Larry Niven on the left. We're continuing to work with getting the extensions working properly so that we can have the search engine. I also hope to have a bit better "store" for subscribers and to offer odds and ends like books. Real Soon Now...
|
This week: | Tuesday,
June 8, 1999 Doctor's appointment this evening. Day was devoured by locusts. I am attempting to organize this place but it is not easy.
|
This week: |
Wednesday,
June 9, 1999 Interesting day yesterday. All kinds of news, which I hope were not cosmically related. But you never know. I continue to struggle with Front Page 98. It's simple enough: Darnell's site runs NT, but the Front Page Extensions don't seem to be properly implemented. I can publish to it just fine, but the Search Engine won't work. I tried a commercial site at PAIR.COM, which is a unix server, which has Front Page Extensions working and the search function seems to work, but I can't publish properly. Pair says they have pleny of Front Page sites there, and it's all Microsoft's fault, and I should have a smaller web site, or break this into more than one web (I presume paying for each) or simplify it, or cut back on the images. None of which makes sense since this certainly works at binmedia.com and other places at least this complicated seem to be hosted properly. There were a lot of broken links, which Bob Thompson rather painstakingly fixed: they were mostly due to the CAPITAL LETTER conventions with directory names, plus Front Page having a rather cavalier and inconsistent attitude about case sensitivity. That's Microsoft's fault. There is also considerable confusion, at least with me, about "personal web server" and Microsoft Internet Information Server, both of which seem to be running on my Compaq NT 4 with Service Pack 4 plus Y2K fixes. If you want to see what happens on the UNIX site it's at 216.92.73.36, but I am not able to keep it up to date properly. I can't publish to it. I have tried scrubbing all traces of Front Page from this system, then reinstalling. I get messages about "Microsoft Internet Information Server", and also weird messages like "cannot create C:\INETPUB\wwwroot\_vti_pvt which is interesting. When I first started fooling with Front Page it created that directory and that is where it put my first web. When we had the great disaster followed by the attempt to run this site on a Qube with Linux, I eliminated that and put the sites in the root directory. When I scrubbed -- and I tried to eliminate all traces of Front Page 98 -- and tried to start over, it did NOT create that directory. Eventually I created it since Front Page wanted it -- it kept complaining about not being able to create that file, and when I created blank directories INETPUB\wwwroot\ then it worked. Thompson has a letter logging some of the problems over in mail. There is also discussion there. This may all be fixed with Front Page 2000. It may not be. It might be fixed if I knew a good web maintenance and management system that would import Front Page stuff: I have a lot invested in this. Have I been absorbed? Is resistance futile? There is certainly a great deal of sunk cost in this system. It may also be time to take out a second web site and break this up into parts, but that seems a bit drastic, somewhat expensive, and I hope needless. I had hoped to get this going with FP Extensions, add a "store" to make it easier to subscribe, and add a bit of user discussion forum; but at the moment we can't make this publish to the PAIR site, and while it publishes just fine to binmedia, the extensions aren't working properly there. Please do NOT send me speculations and guesses. I have plenty of those and can come up with more. But if you understand Front Page, and why an NT Workstation seems to want to run Microsoft Internet Information Server only I can't find it running, and why we need INETPUB/WWWROOT/_vti_pvt which is a file that when I try to install Front Page 98 I am told it can't open (so I have to create INETPUB/WWWROOT/ but what it does for me I don't know).. If you know about this stuff, I would appreciate advice. But I really would just now not have to deal with a thousand emails telling me the problem is that Micro$oft Sucks. On the other hand, if you know of a good web maintenance system that will import Front Page webs, that I would like to know about. Peter Glaskowsky tried to persuade me to use Dreamweaver; I didn't because it wouldn't follow link in the editor and I thought I wanted that. Turns out I didn't need the feature. Well, we learn. I even have a button that types "I do all these silly things so you won't have to..."
|
This week: |
Thursday,
June 10, 1999Subject: new worm using Outlook to spread
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/worm.explore.zip.html
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2273505,00.html?chkpt=hpqs014 Since you guys all get a lot of e-mail, and since Jerry and Bob got hit the last time I thought I would forward this to all of you. This time it is a worm instead of a virus and it is a lot nastier, capable of deleting files. It also uses Outlook to spread like the Melissa virus did. I know first hand that AT&;T is getting hit w/this one and apparently Microsoft is as well. Have fun.
It has not shown up here yet, but I will watch for it. Meanwhile everyone, be warned... And this just in: Want to hear what the week in review sounds like? http://cmpweb-media0.web.cerf.net/radio/archives/1999/06/19990611.ram Jerry, if you want to make it available as a permanent archive on your site, you can. We'll leave it up and see what kind of traffic it draws.
|
This week: |
Friday,
June 11, 1999 I seem to be falling further and further behind. QUESTION: Does anyone know how to convert an existing directory into a sub-web in Front Page? I see references to all this, and it's tantalizing, but it doesn't say HOW to do it. I need baby talk precise instructions I fear. Such as an example. In my case I would like to make, fo instance, mail and view into sub-webs. There are other parts of this I could do that with. Once again, while I appreciate well meant advice, please don't spectulate. There are many areas in which speculation is more interesting than "expertise" (education comes to mind) but in this case I need precise advice. Grey morning and my sore throat is back. That isn't fun. See a long exchange of letters in mail for views about the Operating System Wars... And if you are an ISDN expert, please see mail. Dr. Huth has a problem...
|
This week: | Saturday,
June 12, 1999 I have converted every one of the directory names for this site into lower case only, and I'll use that convention henceforth. File names are a different story. I have to rely on you to find and report broken links, and my thanks to all of you who do this. If you report broken links, please tell me:
That's a bit of work, of course, but you at least know what it is you've found. A report that "a link to foozis is broken" doesn't, alas, do me a great deal of good given the size of this place... Now to try to get the Front Page Extensions working. First I'll try to publish this place to the Pair.com site where all the extensions DO work, and see. The problem up to now has been that you can't PUBLISH to that site, and if you use ftp to do it manually all kinds of problems happen with the indexing. Front Page doesn't like ftp if its extensions are running. My advice to anyone creating a web would be to think a while before going with the Borg. Once you start Front Page it's hard to go elsewhere. I sort of wish I had stayed with Dreamweaver. On the other hand I am not sure Dreamweaver has the kind of robots and document search features that Front Page would have if it worked properly. ALSO: Front Page is seriously broken in one respect: if, after painstakingly converting all the folder names to all lower case, you then create a link with a folder name in it by following the link and clicking on it in FP Editor, you will get AN UPPER CASE FOLDER NAME inserted into the code. This means that a UNIX Front Page site will NOT BE ABLE TO find the folder. FP solves this on an NT site by not caring about the case; and in fact a good argument can be made for that practice, but since NT isn't capable of the server efficiency of UNIX systems, and UNIX DOES care, it's unconscionable that Front Page makes deliberately broken links and inserts them. I was horrified to see that after all my work, FP was putting in capital letters. I would have been better off converting all my folder names to ALL UPPER CASE which is the convention DOS and NT use to begin with; that would make FP's trick useless. I may yet do that, to avoid the problems in future. But I am unhappy with Front Page. "I do all these silly things so you won't have to..."
I am reminded that you may not know about the REPORTS section of this site. There is a "reports home page" that sort of describes what is available there. It hasn't been revised in a while, but I'm getting to it, and it's still got some good stuff in it.
If you were ever involved in the Science Talent Search or NSF Fair, there is an important letter over in MAIL. This is a test. I find that mail, which has been lower case for some time, is seen as 'mail' when I do links to that directory, but reports, which has been lower case only since last night, becomes 'REPORTS' when I link to that folder. I have since shut down Editor and reopened it. Let's see what that does. Nope, it's still 'REPORTS'. I will now shut down the whole thing, FP Editor and Explorer, and re-open. <<DONE>> Now let us link to reports again. And VOILA! it links to 'reports' now. Even if the link word is REPORTS, of course. So the moral of this story is that with Front Page, if you rename directories, you must SHUT DOWN and REOPEN the Explorer before it knows about the renaming even though it did the renaming itself. We can hope that this will not happen in FP 2000. I have a new Ascend Pipeline Router, which I am told will allow me to use the ISDN line to connect up my system to the ISDN phone. My ISDN phone is connected to the Telos Zephyr, and I know you can turn the Zephyr off and back on and still get a connection through the Telos. One source familiar with ISDN says I cannot share the ISDN line: it must be either full time Telos Zephyr or full time connected to the Ascend for data. I don't find that reasonable but then I don't fully comprehend ISDN. I know they won't work both at the same time (or at least I wouldn't expect them to) but surely I can play switchboard operator and plug the Telos in the few times a week I need it, shutting down the Ascend connection before I do that? Or can I? Once again, I don't want speculation, I need expertise. I have conflicting speculations already. I would very much like to connect up that Ascend Pipeline WAN box and use it, but I must be able to use the Telos connection for the Views of the Week broadcast, and I will probably be doing other radio interviews using it now that I have it. That, then, is primary, but for speedy uploads and web site maintenance I'd sure like to be able to use the Ascend box when, most of the time, I am not using the Telos. Advice wanted. And thanks. I suspect there are a dozen people here who know. I could find out by experiment, but I would really not put the time into it if I am drawing dead. (Drawing dead: an old poker term, meaning that there is no card left in the draw that you could get that would win the pot...)
|
This week: | Sunday,
June 13, 1999 A great deal of invisible work fixing broken links and such. Front Page is annoying. I wonder what I might have used in its stead, though. And if 2000 is better. There is a dialog between me and Robert Bruce Thompson on CD/R, from which I at least learned a good bit; I have posted it over in mail. On ISDN: I am amply convinced there is no way I can connect the Telos and the Ascend Pipeline at the same time, but I never thought I could do that. What I need to know is if there is any way I can connect them alternatively; for that matter, if there is any device I can buy that will switch from one to the other at need? I really would like to be able to use that ISDN line for something other than radio broadcasts, and I find it hard to believe that there is no way to do it. And in fact I am now told it can be done. New adventures at Chaos Manor. But I have the Ascend people to call on for getting their box working. This ought to be intersting. Time for my macro: "I do all these silly things so you won't have to..."
|