Current View |
CHAOS MANOR MAILA SELECTIONMail May 31 - June 6, 1999CLICK ON THE BLIMP TO SEND MAIL TO ME The current page will always have the name currentmail.html and may be bookmarked. For previous weeks, go to the MAIL HOME PAGE.
Fair warning: some of those previous weeks can take a minute plus to download. After Mail 10, though, they're tamed down a bit. IF YOU SEND MAIL it may be published; if you want it private SAY SO AT THE TOP of the mail. I try to respect confidences, but there is only me, and this is Chaos Manor. If you want a mail address other than the one from which you sent the mail to appear, PUT THAT AT THE END OF THE LETTER as a signature. PLEASE DO NOT USE DEEP INDENTATION INCLUDING LAYERS OF BLOCK QUOTES IN MAIL. TABS in mail will also do deep indentations. Use with care or not at all. I try to answer mail, but mostly I can't get to all of it. I read it all, although not always the instant it comes in. I do have books to write too... I am reminded of H. P. Lovecraft who slowly starved to death while answering fan mail. If you want to send mail that will be published, you don't have to use the formatting instructions you will find when you click here but it will make my life simpler, and your chances of being published better.. This week: HIGHLIGHTS:
|
© |
Monday, May 31, 1999Have recently read about the problems you were having with your web site, I thought that you might be interested in this piece of news, since it may save you and your readers some frustration. I recently upgraded to Microsoft FrontPage 2000, mainly because of the fact that unlike FrontPage 98, it does not insist upon rearranging your neatly formatted HTML code every time you attempt to edit a page. There are also a number of other neat features, such as the elimination of the requirement of having a personal web server running on the system that you are working with FrontPage on. All in all, a much improved package, except for one major problem. FrontPage 2000 comes with a set of file types that it "knows" about, and it will publish those file types quite successfully to a server that supports _any_ version of the FrontPage extensions. However, there are a number of non-Microsoft file types that are NOT on its list. Attempting to publish files, such as Adobe Acrobat files or certain Macromedia file types, to a web server will basically scramble the content, since FrontPage 2000 insists on transferring all such (unknown) file types as "text" files by default. I have searched through the help files with FrontPage 2000, and also surfed over to Microsofts on-line support site to try and find additional information, all to no avail. Next stop, is to put in a call to Microsoft technical support, and pay my money to find out something that should be in the help files in the first place. Incidentally, I know that I can manually FTP the file up in binary mode. Unfortunately for me, I host my web site with Hiway (a.k.a. Verio) -- and they _strongly_ discourage people who use the FrontPage extensions from using FTP to manually add files to their site. Their argument is that manually placing files on the server will damage the FrontPage extensions, and will cause your site to summarily stop working. Soimportant safety tip . . . if you use non-Microsoft file types with FrontPage 2000, be prepared for some serious challenges in publishing your content. kaufman@newworlddesign.com http://www.newworlddesign.com Thank you. That may well save me a good bit of work. ===
Mr. Purnell apprears to be a relative, as are the Parnell's of Ireland; So far as I know we're the original Norman branch of the family, but there are variants here and there, rare as the name is. In any event:
You got me going on a net scavenger hunt for information on the subject of separation of church and state... I wonder what got your motor going on this issue Dad... ??? A few years ago I read two books full of Jeffersons Letters, I did not remember this one, (probably just scanned it) there were many interesting letters from Jefferson to Adams after both served terms as presidents. They both died on the same day, miles apart, 50 years to the day that they signed the Decoration of Independence on July 4th 1826. Why did you get involved in the Church State issue? I found a few references you might find interesting
http://www.freedomforum.org/religion/1998/8/4jeffersonletter.asp
http://w3.trib.com/FACT/1st.jeffers.2.html
http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeffsite.htm
FBI Analyzes "Separation Of Church And State" Letter WASHINGTON, D.C. (EP) -- The FBIs crime lab has turned up new evidence in a 200-year-old mystery. Analysis of a letter from Thomas Jefferson has uncovered some corrections and changes, illustrating that Jeffersons pledge to separate church and state was made for reasons of political expediency, according to the organizer of an exhibit on religion in America at the Library of Congress. Contrary to popular belief, the famous phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the U.S. Constitution. It comes from a letter Jefferson wrote to some Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut. According to James H. Hutson, who heads the librarys manuscripts collections, Jeffersons letter was an attempt to explain his unwillingness to issue Thanksgiving proclamations. According to FBI laboratory analysis, Jefferson originally wrote that in his refusal to issue such a proclamation he was "confining myself to the duties of my station, which are merely temporal." That was crossed out. Hutson says Jeffersons political advisors convinced him that the sentence would alienate New England churchgoers. In calling for a wall of separation between church and state, Jefferson originally proposed an "eternal" wall, but deleted that word as well. Jefferson wrote the famous letter in 1802, after winning a presidential election in which opponents attacked him as an atheist. His views on religion were out of step with his time. Of the 13 original colonies, nine had official churches. Explaining the significance of the find, Hutson wrote, "It will be of considerable interest in assessing the credibility of the Danbury Baptist letter as a tool of constitutional interpretation to know, as we now do, that it was written as a partisan counterpunch, aimed by Jefferson below the belt of enemies who were tormenting him more than a decade after the First Amendment was composed." The exhibit suggests that the letter was motivated by Jeffersons political need to mollify critics and build political support, and was not intended as a straightforward interpretation of a constitutional principle. The exhibit notes that Jefferson began to attend worship services held at the House of Representatives two days after writing the letter, and that he permitted worship services to be held in federal buildings. Jeffersons letter and the FBIs restoration work are among the items in an exhibit at the Library of Congress called, "Religion and the Founding of the American Republic." (EP - Evangelical Press News Service) (Post date: June 12, 1998) http://www.danbury.lib.ct.us/org/religion/letter/jeff.html
http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/P/tj3/writings/brf/jeflxx.htm
http://www.universitylake.org/primarysources.html
http://www.infidels.org/wire/stories/loc_jeffWall.html
S. Purnell [sp@aloha.com] Jefferson was a complex man. Most of the Framers were considerably more religious than he was, probably in views and certainly in practice. The US was founded as a Christian nation, with most of the Colonies having established -- that is, tax supported -- churches. The intent of the Constitution was to prevent the Federal government from interfering with State religious matters, either by establishing a national religion or by disestablishing any of the State ones. All the states did disestablish before the Civil War with some residuals such as state support of religious based orphanages and pauper houses and schools for pauper children; that continued long after the Civil War amendments, and it was only in recent years that the courts discovered any intent on the part either of the Framers or of those who adopted the Civil War Amendments to form any "wall of separation" between state churches and state government; and certainly not from education.
|
© |
Tuesday, June 1, 1999Mr. Pournelle,Here is the site for NT SP5 as you requested http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/sp5/default.aspBTW, I have been comparing MEMTURBO to the utility CLEARMEM found on the NT 3.5 Resource Kit. So far, CLEARMEM is the clear winner in freeing up extra memory. It always seems to find about 2meg memory if run after MEMTURBO. Ron Rowe Thanks. For NT I would be astonished if anything were better. I should have tried that earlier, and thank you. === Your html needs the demoronizer. I have enjoyed your recent columns on the Byte.com website. However I have found the screwed up HTML to be quite annoying. Everywhere I expect a I see a question mark when I use netscape running on linux. I saved the HTML source to disk and I saw that you had ASCII 92 in all those locations. Apparently you use a Microsoft product to produce your html. There is a detailed description of this problem and a solution at http://www.fourmilab.ch/webtools/demoroniser/. Michael Procario EMAIL: procario@cmu.edu Department of Physics PHONE:
I fear I pay little attention to products which start with the premise that I am a moron. If there is a problem with an easy solution I might do something and I might not, but not being a moron, I am unlikely to need a demoronizer. Apparently about 90% of the people working on line use one or another Microsoft product to produce their pages. I hate to tell you this but my goal is not html, my goal is something readable, and I can read this with a Mac, with Netscape, and with IE in several flavors. I have a number of Linux users come here and yours is the first suggestion that I need to escape being a moron. Stay well. Actually, I seem to have taken this the wrong way, although those who name their programs "demoronizer" should expect a certain amount of error in that direction. Apparently also the problem is "smart quotes" over in BYTE.com, something that Front Page doesn't attempt. Which may be my point, not all Microsoft products produce terrible results. I always use Netscape as my primary viewer largely to be certain that things here will look reasonable in it, since I am pretty sure that if they look all right in Netscape they will look good in Internet Explorer.In any event I am sure no offense was intended, and I should have taken none. In expiation for my irritation this was the first message I saw after the long drive home with other aggravations of an already weary mind... === My 35 year-old-daughter and I have be agonizing with you over the last several days. I know that you want to have your own server so you can write about it, but gosh, we are paying Ameritech $46 per month to serve us, with or without Front Page. Your time is worth much more than that. Do you, as I do, do your own carpentry? I believe this is similiar. I pay to have my car fixed, but fix anything electronic myself. With all respect, I would much rather have your comments about programs ( What is the best MP3 ripper for example?) Charles C.E.B. [ceb@ameritech.net] I seem to have been misunderstood. Darnell wanted to use a Qube box as the server, which would have been an interesting experiment, but I have your views about this site: I'll keep experimental things going for the purposes of experiments, but when it comes to work, let the carpenter stick to his last or whatever I will play but my job is to write books. Thanks. As to MP3 rippers, at the moment I have no right to a comment, but I suspect that will change. Which in fact it did. For a recommendation, click here. ===
Subject: Epson printers don't really run out of ink so quick Jerry, Enjoy your site as I always enjoyed your column in Byte. I go there when I need intellectual stimulation (more and more often it seems). I guess one day I will feel sufficiently guilty to pay you for your efforts. It will certainly be worth it. Can you keep going until my oldest daughter graduates from Virginia Tech in 01? Ha. Anyway, I have something that you may know about, but if not, I think it is just the sort of thing you enjoy hearing. Last year, I got my daughter an Epson 440 for college. I then acquired Epson 640s for myself here at work and at home. I think both give excellent quality for the price. Except for the cost of the ink cartridges. That is a problem with any ink jet I guess. As you may know, Epson has a neat utility (the Epson Status Monitor) that shows what document it is printing, what page of how many, and most neatly, how much ink is left in both your black and white and color ink cartridges. Very handy! When my 640 at work ran out of ink, I pulled the cartridge to get the number (I didnt see the number on the cover!). I then replaced the cartridge. It was by then printing very badly. It was under-inking words, and sentences. But I was desperate for a draft of a document and figured it would do at least that. Lo and behold! It made a lot of noises, moved the cartridge holder a lot (going through its cleaning or new cartridge or both cycle), reset the printer utility to show a full black ink cartridge and began counting itself downward with each use as before. Now, however it printed perfectly well just as if I had put in a new ink cartridge! I have since done that on my 640 at home. Recently I had occasion to try the same on my daughters 440. No luck. It was not able to print anything really readable. Then I remembered what the 640 did. I proceeded to push the button to tell the 440 to clean itself. It did so and the printer utility now shows a full ink cartridge and prints perfectly. Go figure. Norris H. Price [PRICEN@gunet.georgetown.edu] Fascinating and thanks for the tip. I use laser printers for everything although I may have to get a jet color printer for some of my maps. I tend to use the ALPS dry ribbon system for color since it is so permanent and nearly waterproof, but I will want scratch maps. But mostly black and white and the HP LaserJets take care of all that nicely. Love that HP 4000. Jerry:Since I have an Epson 850N, I have tracked some of the discussions on the Epson list. Here is what is happening:
<http://www.leben.com/lists/> is the address where folks can signup for Epson Inkjet list if desired. Quite a bit of traffic. --Jim Thanks.
|
© |
Wednesday June 2, 1999
How to have your own custom desktop Icon for Outlook 98 without it being a shortcut. I didn't want to make a shortcut to Outlook's original icon because when I right click on the original Outlook Icon I get to see my Internet account properties information. If I eliminate my original icon and just use a shortcut icon with the picture of my choice, I lose that handy information access. I have a favorite icon I like to keep for Outlook 98 which happens to be the default icon used by Outlook Express Version 4. In case it matters, I use Windows 95 Version 4B
MY QUESTION FOR YOU:
How can I location your entire article from BugNet about:
How to Create and display Word 97 custom properties in Outlook 98. I only have the instructions up until step "s"
Contacts. Laura Carlanell All of my columns are available either here or at BYTE.COM. Here they are listed in a reports folder. Over at BYTE.com you can use a search engine. I keep hoping to get search tools implemented here, but it hasn't happened yet. Thanks. And maybe one of the readers remembers that column
Jerry, Hi, was reading thru your article "Jerry Goes Shopping" at byte.com (http://www.byte.com/columns/chaosmanor/1999/04/0426jpournelle. html) and noticed that the link you put in there for MicroForum points to "http://ww.microforum.com", missing out a "w". Just thought you would like to know.
p/s - Enjoy reading all your articles, have been reading them since I started reading Byte in the late 80s. I'll pass that along to the BYTE.com people. I don't maintain their site, and while I suspect those who do will listen to me, in fact I have little to do with the mechanicals. I also find that the BYTE.com site may have some of the problems detailed in the moron letter; I have yet to find out if this place does. And on that score: You may not have gotten complaints from Linux users about it, but it doesnt mean that the problem isnt there. With the proliferation of Windows development tools which stupidly use "Windows ANSI" quotes when plain ASCII will do, most of us have simply given up on getting authors to fix it. Few authors on the web these days understand what the problem is, and since they dont see it on their machine, they really dont care. Specifically, the problem is two-fold. As Michael Procario mentioned, your software is putting character 0x92 in for single characters. Thats not in ASCII, and its not in ISO-Latin-1 (the default character encoding for HTTP). Thats problem 1. Problem 2 is that the server isnt specifying a character encoding, so even if the browser understood Windows ANSI as a non-default encoding, it wouldnt use it. The solution is easy. Running the Demoroniser on the HTML would fix this problem, as would some other tools. (Being offended by the title of a tool will not solve it, esp. when the recommender was just trying to help and didnt name the tool in the first place.) Incidentally, its only your byte column thats affected... the www.jerrypournelle.com pages are fine. -- Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - Looking for a job in Long Island! Check http://rescomp.wustl.edu/~ats/ for a resume. All that glitters has a high refractive index. Now I understand, but why the devil SHOULD I get complaints from Linux users abut the BYTE.com web site? I have about as much to do with the production of BYTE.com as I had with the page layout and art work of the old print BYTE, which was zero. If my site doesn't need this program, why tell me it does? Yes, I use a Microsoft product in producing this place. I have become accustomed to being abused for doing that. Apparently, though, this time it was all intended for the designers of the BYTE.com web page, which I don't manage, didn't design, and don't produce html for. As to naming tools, I can come up with some tool names that I suspect would offend everyone, and would probably cause people not to use them. I also suspect that this particular tool was named in the expectation that it would be offensive; in the HOPES that it would be offensive to those who needed to use it. How that would induce them to use the tool to make life easier for those who think the sites need that treatment is left as an exercise for a more imaginative novelist than I am. No, it's not quite up there with Micro$oft and Windoze as a term that causes me simply to ignore anything else being said by that source, but it's close. One may rail against Microsoft, one may wish that a different marketing philosophy had prevailed, one might wish that progress in these little machines had gone more slowly and in a more orderly manner; but that didn't happen. For good or ill, Microsoft has chosen a path that says: get it out by a day certain, or be unhappy. Out the door bugs and all is better than in the back room being polished. Moore's Law will bail out most performance problems. Users will tell us about most of the bugs and we can fix them in new releases, both announced and unannounced revisions. Give people who complain a bug fix, and don't tell those who don't complain that bug fixes are available. (That latter is changing now that bug fixes can be distributed on the web.) Be out the door with a product that sort of works, and sort of does the job; don't sit back and make it perfect before offering it for sale, because perfect products are obsolete before they get into the retail channel. Now that may not be an elegant strategy, but it's certainly a successful one. IBM tried to make OS/2 as nearly solid and perfect as human initiative could manage. They didn't succeed, but in the attempt they lost too much time. Apple used the Microsoft strategy with the 128K Mac, the difference being that Apple announced there would not BE any improvements. Fortunately for Apple, no one believed them. Calling Microsoft names and using silly expressions like Windoze won't change matters much. I wish Linux well, but kicking against the pricks may not be the best use of Linux guru energy. In any event, I took the original note to mean that I ought to use a product called demoronizer on my web site. I now have it from the original author that it was intended to apply to the BYTE.com web site only. That was not clear to me. I have no control over the BYTE.com web site. I have sent the note on to the people who do manage it. I have no idea what they intend to do about it. === Mr. Rice, who does the MAILDEX and VIEWDEX indexes, says of MP3 Rippers: Jerry, Audio Catalyst from http://www.xingtech.com
is highly thought of . I use it here and havent found anything that suits me better. John --
John coredump@enteract.com www.enteract.com/~coredump
I plan to retire on the Information Superhighway Which answers the previous question
|
© |
Thursday June 3, 1999just caught your column at byte.com about going through 98b install hell. my procedure:
Hope this helps .... Michael Zawistowski [michaelz@alphasoftware.com] Actually that is pretty much what I do. However, if you use Windows 95 and you intend to install FAT32, you MUST use a boot disk made from a copy of Windows 95b (OSR2) because 95a does not understand FAT 32. Worse, if you later boot a Windows 98 system using FAT32 with a 95a disk, DOS will report that there is no C drive. My problem was not with any of the above, but because the system in question had a SCSI CDROM drive, and because I had copied all the contents of the Windows 95b startup CDROM into C:\WINDOWS\OPTIONS\CABS after I booted in 95b DOS with CDROM support, I hadn't bothered to put the CDROM support onto the hard disk. Let Windows manage that. But when I ran SETUP from Windows\options\cabs, Windows came to the SOUND board; wanted drivers, which it expected t find on the CDROM; and never got out to the point of letting me browse or otherwise DO anything with the command. It was looking for a CDROM which of course it could not find because the SCSI support had not been installed by Windows yet. The remedy was to put a CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT containing CDROM support onto the hard disk so they were installed when I booted with DOS. NOW I ran setup from the hard disk, and when it went to look for drivers from the CDROM, it found the CDROM, decided the drivers were not there, and went to Windows\options\cabs\ found them, and installed fine. It was a sequencing problem, and I told the story largely to illustrate the point that if the BROWSE command had been implemented at that point BEFORE Windows went on a futile search for a CDROM that wasn't there (because Windows installs the SOUND Drivers BEFORE it installs the SCSI support) it would have saved me a bunch of time. Timing is important. Incidentally, I do not seem to have any of those problems with Windows 98 Second Edition, and in this month's column I strongly urge those still in Windows 95, a or b, to get 98 Second edition; it's worth the $100 or so. The only reason to keep 95 now is if, like me, you have a couple of games that want WIN-G, which is not supported by any flavor of 98. THIS MEANS WAR is one such, and I confess I like the stupid game enough that I keep a 95b machine around just to play it on. That is a whim that I suspect most people cannot indulge. The moral of my story above is that when you go to install Windows and your CDROM is SCSI, install all the config.sys and autoexec.bat stuff needed to allow DOS to find the CDROM before you invoke setup for Windows, EVEN IF YOU HAVE ALREADY COPIED THE WINDOWS CDROM to your hard disk (the traditional place for that is C:\WINDOWS\OPTIONS\CABS). ===
Thanks for the many good words both here and in Byte. It is fun to read from a learners journey with computers. And learning keeps you young, doesnt it? Anyway that isnt why I write. A question. Why dont you keep your work and experimental computers separate? I know you have spoken of a writing computer that you use to do serious work. You mentioned Robertas computer that went "sour" _as if_ it were an experimental platform. I always wince when I read of you having machines go down so that you have to reinstall the os. I have done that SO many, many times with Win 95 a, b 98. And I am getting fed up with it. Sometimes I mutter about my hate for MS, Billy Goat Gates and endless computer glitches. I am getting very gun-shy of using "lots of weird software" and new HW devices on computers where I need to be productive. [I have one at home and one at work, where I do computer &; network support.] This week I installed Red Hat 6 on experimental computers at home and work. Better than their previous releases. And I just installed Win2000 OVER Win 95. Very, VERY smooth. Hats off to Microsoft for making the os shift and file system shift from FAT16 to NTFS so simple, and as far as I can see without problems. It took quite a while on a Pentium 200 with 32 MB RAM, but it works. I then installed Office 2000 and it was over Office 97. It is more sluggish, but Im going to boost the RAM. 32 MB is minimum and MS recommends 64. What did I learn? Linux still has install glitchesmouse and video are the major ones. And I can echo your comments on installing software. There is no on-screen simple info on installing the RH packages. But documentation? Too much!!! There are tera X giga X mega bytes on CDs and on the Internet. It looks like you install at the prompt. What else did I learn? Microsoft makes installing such a nice experience now. Something for the unwashed masses. If Win2K is stable and secure it will become the os of choice for American. Probably homes and offices. I understand that Europe is likely to go the Linux way, especially the French. But they always want to be different; a committee to referee the language, yee gads!
Brent Jones [brtjones@ix.netcom.com] This looks like my day for not being as clear as I should be. In general I DO keep work machines separate from experimental, although it is not always possible since I don't do "reviews" and "tests"; I USE things. Roberta's machines are never changed until I have confidence that what we are installing is going to work reliably. They are not even normally on the net although I have a concentrator box down there so it requires only a physical wire running up the stairs to a concentrator here to get her on my internal net. Yesterday's disaster with Roberta's machine was probably caused by a combination of power failures and an overzealous housekeeper cleaning among the rat's nest of wires at the back of her machines. For whatever reason, when I went down to the beach the machines were working, and when I came back one of them was and one was not working. The symptom was that it would get past the splash screen then hang. Nothing I could do would fix that, and eventually I did more harm than good trying to change things. See the column for details; there is a moral to the story. But this was the first problem with one of her systems since I built and installed her second, and the Gateway 2000 Pentium 200 ("Joizy") has worked reliably for YEARS with Windows 95. It needs more memory, and that turns out to be harder to get than you might think (it was a leading edge model when it came out), but it works quite well. And when I do experiments on my own stuff, I start with a machine that isn't vital, but eventually I have to work with a machine I USE; that's how I find a lot of problems that "reviews" and "test labs" don't find: they aren't USING the machines in everyday work, games, DVD playing, communications, and such like. I do, and I can find bugs no one else suspects... But in fact in general most stuff here works pretty well. Mostly of course you hear about problems, and it is probably time for me to update that part of my web site on things I do NOT have problems with === Re-inking cartridgesJust a quick note on re-inking: I estimate that Im saving about $200 a year by doing this. Whats more, the children almost fight to do it. The job can be, and is done, by an 11 year old. That saving includes the cost of new carts every 7 or 8 refills and an assumed 25% shorter life for the print head. Interestingly however my print heads last about 18 months, when the expected average life is 1 year. This is probably due to frequent use - newsletters and homeworks. Also think of the environmental aspects - less non degradable waste. David Cefai [davcefai@keyworld.net] ===
|
© |
Friday June 4, 1999(This refers to a question I asked over in View):Mr. Pournelle, Greetings and salutations. Kiplings poem, Tarrant Moss, is probably referring to an incident recorded in the Boarder Ballads, collected by Sir Walter Scott. Scott was a descendant of the Reiver families on the boarder of Scotland and England. Tom Kastan I don't know why but I thought Tarrant Moss had to do with Ireland. Now I look in my Kipling and find that the story of Tarrant Moss is "from the Plain Tales from the Hills" so I suspect you are correct. I'll dig into it when I have more time. I know about Scott. If I have an ambition it's to write as well as he did. Given that he had to tell his readers about everything, since he was writing before there were many illustrations, photographs, comics, movies, or TV so he had to provide word descriptions of things and places his readers had never seen and never would see, his stories move along amazingly well. I can refer you to an image you'll have seen: you all know what St. Basil's in Moscow looks like so I needn't describe it if I set a scene in Red Square; Scott would have had to tell you what an onion-dome looked like. His Quentin Durward is still the best source of information about the life and times of Louis XI the "spider king" that you'll ever find. Thanks. It's probably a story in Plain Tales that I somehow missed in my youth. I haven't read any of those stories in 20 years, and it's probably time to go back to them. I got interested in Kipling when I was about 10 and they did a radio dramatization and reading of "The Drums of the Fore and Aft", which sent chills up my youthful spine. === Where can we find Win 98 2nd Edition? I have gone to microsoft.com, cdw.com and compusa.com and find no reference to it. Brent Jones [brtjones@ix.netcom.com] It's coming out Real Soon Now, about $20 for the upgrade fro, 98, and about $100 for the upgrade from 95. Shouldn't be more than a couple of weeks. Jerry,I just ordered Windows 98 second edition last night (Thursday, June 3) at Egghead (www.egghead.com) for $99.48. I checked about 5 other popular websites and they weren't selling the Second Edition yet. The Egghead page claimed that it was in stock, and the normal shipping is two business day delivery. -I hope- -I hope- it will get delivered on Tuesday. I really want it for internet sharing of my cable modem. randall.chung@conexant.com ===
With reference to your article on Byte.com "Primary, Secondary, Slave: It Does Make A Difference"
Firstly The creative labs PC-DVD Dxr2 5x Kit comes with a drive that is 5x DVD speed, which is 5x the speed of original DVD drives. However, the speed for CDs is a totally different one, it is either 32 or 36 for that particular drive, I am not quite sure, but it is definitely not 5. You also mention some colour issues when using the pass through board, lots of my friends have the same DVD kit as you and they all complain about the poor quality when the pass through is use. You will find it with any video card that you use. I actually ordered one but the supplier was out of stock and they sent me another one instead - the videologic decoder board and the Panasonic DVD drive. This drive is exactly the one that you get with the dxr2 5x kit but it is badged as creative with the kit. The decoder had to be sent back as it would only work if I removed all of my other PCI cards. However, when it did work, the pass through was of perfect quality. Such a shame, it was a nice set-up if it would work properly. Anyway, I digress, the supplier took it back and I waited patiently for the creative kit to come back in stock. Then I noticed that creative were shortly releasing their dxr3 kit with 6x DVD (and 24x CD for some reason I still havent worked out, possibly because creative have moved to Toshiba drives instead of the above mentioned Panasonic). I promptly changed my order to this new one in the hope that the pass through issues had been solved. When I received the card, installation was easy enough, and I was running soon enough. The application crashes the first time I run it, then when I kill the process, and restart it, the app works fine and I can watch DVDs to my hearts content. Unfortunately, after this crash I cannot use my network connection or my TV card until I reboot the system. (Grrrr) Also the card is region locked, there is no way of changing it, it is hard coded into the card. (Grrr) I hope someone comes out with a fix for this problem soon. I hope this crashing problem is solved when I re-install windows when I get a chance. As far as the pass through quality is concerned, it is no better. All edges are blurred and it is just a pain. (sigh). Keep up the good work
You're right, of course; For a DVD 5x isn't the same as 5x on a CDROM drive. A 5x DVD is plenty fast enough to be the only CDROM in a machine, and one of my machines has too many CDROM drives on it: A DVD, a 36X CDROM, and a TEAC 6x24 CD-R. The CD-R is a bit noisy -- not horrible but a little -- and will probably get moved to a machine elsewhere, since it works extremely well and efficiently and makes CDROMS's quickly and easily with Adaptec CD Creator, but I'd prefer not to have the noise next to me. The CDROM drive won't be needed at all. I can manage with a DVD an nothing else. Clearly one needs a CDROM as well as a CD/R on some machine if you are to make copies of CD's With the ATI Rage Fury Video Card and their DVD program you do not need a DVD Decoder card at all, and I will take the one out of this machine next time I open it up. This is with a Pentium II 400 or so. Does DVD just fine
|
© |
Saturday June 5, 1999(I hope this still works. THINGS are HAPPENING...)
http://www.shopper.com/idx/STORAGE/MEDIA__OPTICAL/3_5_IN_/
http://www.dirtcheapdrives.com/web_store/web_store.cgi?page=html/main_top.ht
ml&;cart_id=YM03QM&;no_trailer=1 The first lists 640s for as little as US$12 each in five-packs. The second, Dirt Cheap Drives, sells Teijin brand 640s for US$15 each in ten-packs. I can vouch for Teijin media. Not one problem over years of use They are a large Taiwanese maker of unbranded media for the OEMs. Be careful with DCD. IMO they are honest, but have some clumsy clerical help in accounting. Watch your invoice &; billing like a hawk. A plus in favor of Fujitsu over competing products is their "No Excuses" service backup. I had the misfortune to have two Fujitsu 2.5Gig HDDs die within days of each other. I called Fujitsu, was immediately &; routinely issued an RMA #. I shipped the drives to them, and received two new ones by return express. You can be sure Fujitsu is my first choice from here on out. You have to experience it to understand. It is backup the way it SHOULD be. Nor was my experience exceptional. I am an individual user with zero clout - no corporate PO, etc.
Thank you. I am very fond of the Fujitsu Magneto Optical DynaMO 640. It creates very stable copies on a medium small enough to carry in a shirt pocket, and I find it invaluable for making certain that important files are saved and kept outside Chaos Manor. Thanks for the source on 640 cartridges. I too find Fujitsu a good company to deal with. ===
|
© |
Sunday June 6, 1999
re: windows and power management Read your rant against power management, and wanted to tell you that I have come up with what I feel is an excellent solution. Simply dont let windows have anything to do with it. In the System Configuration Utility, on the Startup tab, there are two items dealing with power management that can be disabled. These are both listed as "LoadPowerProfile" and all you have to do is un-check the boxes next to them and then reboot. From then on, as far as I know, windows should have no power saving features turned on. I have been running this way for months now and never had a problem.
I wish it were that simple. Systems lately will not let you turn off the "power management" features. I have one system that goes into a mode that turns the monitor into a state that it cannot recover from, never even by power cycling. I have to reset the machine to get a synch. And none of this saves any real power. A couple of light bulbs worth at best: I mean, power supplies typically have a max rating of 7 amps which is about 700 watts. If you were using all that power -- and you aren't -- it would be 7 lightbulbs. The trouble is that Americans are illiterate and innumerate, and the more of both you are, the more likely you are to develop "feelings" and it's the "feelings" that get you the will to power. The desire to do good, with power, in the hands of those unable to understand what they are doing, is still incompetence rather than malice, but it is a special kind of arrogant incompetence. Amory Lovins is, I think, wrong, but at least he understands what he is saying and doing. Most of the greens have no the slightest notion. As the Green leader in California once told me in an interview "The only physics I ever took was ExLax": he literally did not know what a watt was. But he was all for saving energy. If they were all like Amory we could at least have a debate, but most of them are in the ExLax category. Anyway, it is getting harder to disable power management. Alas. ===
Take a look at http://www.jpsoft.com/4dosdes.htm for a program called 4DOS. I've used it for a decade, now and is to me what Norton Commander was to you, I suspect. It works as a replacement for command.com and installs painlessly. Install it, and invoke it. Doing a "dir>foo.txt" will produce an alpha-sorted file. It can do all kinds of neat-o tricks, too. Hope this helps. Hard Code [inwards@netrover.com]
I used to recommend 4DOS. Been a while since I used it. NT sort BIG directories without problems. So does Windows 98 2nd edition. So all's well. Thanks.
|
Entire
contents copyright 1999 by Jerry E. Pournelle. All rights reserved. |