Contents | CHAOS MANOR MAIL A SELECTION Mail 10: September 28 - October 4, 1998 |
Go to PREVIOUS MAIL WEEKS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fair warning: some of those previous weeks can take a minute plus to download. IF YOU SEND MAIL it may be published; if you want it private SAY SO AT THE TOP of the mail. I try to respect confidences, but there is only me, and this is Chaos Manor. Begin with Eric on Legacy and Data Bases The scary part about Microsoft pulling SR2 Discussion and tips on wave sound recording. NOTICE: Sound Compression discussion is continued on Sound |
|
Eric Pobirs [nbrazil@ix.netcom.com] The once ballyhooed Cairo file system has gone underground as a portion of an application. Thats no big secret. The same thing is happening all over the computing landscape. Oracle, for instance, is very loudly touting their latest database product as an Internet File System. It understands other file systems like that found in Windows and tries to overcome legacy issues by having everything happen on the server. They hope this will make thin clients more attractive, of course but theyve acknowledge that morbidly obese clients are going away any year soon. Similar efforts are in motion from numerous other vendors. The idea is that the information should be the central organizing point rather than the file it is contained in. Since Microsoft deals more heavily in the client end they have more of a legacy problem. This is probably a greater source of anxiety than the DOJ for Redmond. How do you make any big improvements without losing large chunks of user base along the way. I think the choice of Outlook is a big indicator of the strategy. The PIM and messaging client is the closest thing to a DB system the majority of people will deal with first hand. It contains a great deal of personal data Vs. corporate data for a full-on DB system. Outlooks little sibling Express is now part of Win98 and also the eventual NT 5. Growing Outlook Express into the full Outlook as an OS component seems a straightforward progression toward an information-centric environment. Thatll be swell for the evolution of PCs but it will also add another layer of arcana when things go wrong. Just the thing to keep guys like me alive. Outlook express doesn't work the same as Outlook. In particular the defaults are different. Sometimes that makes me crazy. In Outlook if you look at a document in preview it is 'read', but in Outlook Express which Outlook uses as the mail viewer that doesn't work so well. In theory there is a timer for how long you have it in preview before it is marked read but in practice I have to open news thingies before it considers them 'read'. Other stuff. But I expect they will get them better integrated as time goes on. ===
Kit Case [xeco@inxsnet.com] Jerry, I have actually seen a Palm III upgrade at Staples in St. George Utah. I have a Palm II and if I could justify it, Id get the upgrade. Actually, I have heard that the recommended upgrade is the one with the built in paging feature. I love my Palm Pilot, take it everywhere, and dont know how I got by without it. Linux box: I was running Red Hat 5.0 when my Master Boot Record died. This was (fortunately) on a Saturday morning. The rest of the day felt like one of your columns that Dave Barry talked about, or, as a friend of mine said "life is a bitch, and shes having puppies." My HD showed other signs of imminent death, so Im taking my system into the local office store here in Cedar City for a new motherboard, memory, and an 8.3 GB HD. Then I will try linux again, as well as getting an MPEG encoder card and doing video CDs. I have some episodes of BtVS on tape and will probably start there. Getting linux running is fun, but can be time consuming.
Well, you don't seem to be moving any faster than I am! === Jerry, I was just looking through the XFree86 FAQ, and I noticed that Riva 128 support was added in XFree86 version 3.3.2. The version on the RedHat CD that you have is one version earlier than that, so if you want to get your Riva 128 to work, youll need to download a more recent version of XFree86. Installing a new X-Windows is not horrenously complex, but its not exactly user-friendly either. Youll almost certainly have some trouble with it. Having done it myself, Id be happy to help you through it, although I dont want to spoil the purity of your "experiment" unless you really need the help. Your starting point is (http://www.xfree86.org). Because hardware manufacturers are reluctant to release specifications to their hardware, Linux usually runs between 6 months to 1 year behind in driver support; On the other hand, older hardware tends to be supported much more comprehensively. Also, bug fixes are available on a much more timely basis. The exception to this rule is for brand-new experimental hardware, such as SMP CPUs, which arent supported under Windows, these tend to get supported in Linux rather quickly as the manufacturer has a much greater incentive to support third-party drivers. The other problem with lag time is that the Red Hat CDs are only published every few months, and each CD contains a snapshot of the stable "release" version at the time of publication, not the more advanced "development" version. Red Hat now has a new product called "Raw Hide" which is a compilation of the development version of Linux, as well as alpha versions of various applications and utilities. What this means for the user, generally, is that hardware that is less than one year old is often significantly more complex to install than older hardware. Talin (Talin@ACM.org) -- Systems Engineer, PostLinear Entertainment. [http://www.sylvantech.com/~talin]
Thanks. Always welcome your advice. Slowly I accumulate the stuff I need...
===
Scott Kitterman [kitterma@erols.com] The scary part is that the Microsoft release explaining why they pulled SR-2 says there is an installation problem, but if it installed OK you can continue to use it. For me, it installed fine. It was after I started using it that the trouble began. I get the impression they arent going to make SR-2 work any better, just improve the install. http://officeupdate.microsoft.com/nonIE4/articles/sr2factNonIE4.htm
Scott Kitterman That IS frightening. Thanks.
roger@pswtech.com WAV files are not compressed. This is going to cause some grief for Roberta, depending on a few things: 1st, what resolution is she recording these WAV files in? 44.1 KHz, 16 bit? This is CD-quality audio and takes up a lotta space. Its also overkill for spoken word, since the human voice falls into a pretty small audio spectrum and doesnt need all that space. You can save some space by using 22KHz and even more by dropping to 8-bit, and a lot more by dropping to 11.5 KHz. Alternatively you can record all the files at 44.1/16bit and then use a number of audio editing/conversion programs to drop them down to the desired rate. I assume she is recording in mono? Stereo tracks will take up twice the space and again are not really necessary for spoken word. Unfortunately all my audio program experience is on the Mac, but the two programs that I have heard good things about for recording and maniupulation are Sound Forge and Cool Edit. Cool Edit is available as shareware, and is also available in a Pro version. http://www.syntrillium.com/cooledit/cool96.htm
You could also muck about with different audio file formats, but since WAV is supported natively in Windows and nothing else is, youd have to have some sort of audio playback engine within the program to play back something like an AIFF or MPEG audio file. These files can be compressed mightily small, but do need something to read them. --
I was vaguely aware of all that, but thanks for putting it succinctly. We will use wav files because they are supported by nearly all Windows systems. But recording in 8 bit mono may tame them down a lot. Actually we'll continue to record in CD mode and use some kind of software to crunch them I think, and see how that sounds. THANKS! ===
Eric Pobirs [nbrazil@ix.netcom.com] I think much of the enthusiasm for leveling parts of Europe is economic opportunity. Even the most ignorant businessman recalls the great times that followed WWII and more recently how swell its been selling American brands into Viet Nam. Its a vague theory at best but I think many people believe that a location levelled today will be a bonanza tomorrow. Then there is also the placebo effect. Who wouldnt a get a little lift out of bombing certain Euros? If we cant vaporize the French language police we can settle for a few genocidal assholes and pretend they were the annoying French. No comment... == >> There is one major problem with Outlook: it keeps all its data: calendar, contacts list, diary, everything, in one enormous file called outlook.pst. Mine resides in the WINNT40 directory, but sometimes it hides in other places. The file is one big binary file, and cannot be edited. It cant be backed up when Outlook is open. To back it up you must close Outlook, then copy that file somewhere. Since it contains all your mail, appointments, and everything else you certainly will want to keep backup copies.To make a backup or a copy of your .pst file, just go to File, select Import and Export, then select Export to a File and finally select Personal Folder Files (pst). You will then be presented with a collapsible directory of all your Outlook 98 folders to back up or copy. I use this feature and find it very useful for copying all my Outlook 98 data and transfering it to another PC. (Use the Import function) Hope this helps.:) Btw I have always enjoyed reading your column in Byte Magazine. In fact, it is the only reason why I buy Byte. Shyang Thank you. I also learned that from Microsoft, although it took a while. There's so much arcana floating around; and all I can tell you is that HELP and my books including third party reference books didn't tell me this. You explain it well, and thanks. === Warrick M. Locke [warlocke@mail.wf.net] While visiting your Mail, found the link to AfriCam. Interesting! My machine is WAY too slow to spend much time with that sort of thingold 486 hooked to an (agressively) rural phone system via a 28.8--but it makes me think of something. H. Beam Pipers characters were always tuning in on their "screen communicators" to various static viewstheres the fire scene Little Fuzzy looks at, and the tower cams everybody seems to use for decorative wallpaper, all through the books. Isnt it fascinating? Makes you wonder if Mr. Piper really was (p)reincarnated. Ric Thanks. I'd forgotten about that. One day I still hope to do a sequel to Space Vikings, but I fear it would be a labor of love and not income. Ah well. == Sunday October 4, 1998 Interesting mail. Good idea. I wish I could clone myself and do all this. Actually, I have non-exclusive rights to all my old BYTE columns, and I ought to start getting those up here. If only there were more hours in the day.
Philip Ternahan [ternahan@dock.net] I woke up this morning and had a thought Id like to share with you. Now that youre running your own site, could you put up reading lists in a separate section? Although I realize that Bytes heirs own the words you sold to them, a lot of what youve recommended over the years assumes "classic" proportions. Also, along the lines of "classical schooling" do you recall the "reconsidered" series that Kenneth Rexroth had in The New Republic about 30 years ago? He went back to the classics and wrote pieces on them. I have no idea whether those were ever published on the web or only exist in back issues. I believe he died years ago....Still, its rather disheartening to think that lots of people have no idea that Beowulf exists.. Have a good day, Phil. ==
Jon Bass [jbass@wts.net] I really liked it. It was full of "news I can use" as usual. The only thing I have a specific comment on is this: "PI is the oddest movie I have seen in several years, and I think all computer enthusiasts will like it." and "In other words, while some of those howlers might have been accidents or ignorance, there are just too many: the director had to know what he was doing." I am a computer enthusiast and I did not like the movie. The numerous "howlers" you mentioned combined with various "over the top" art film techniques became too much of a distraction for me. My friends, most of whom are also computer enthusiasts, did not like the movie either. Then again, we were expecting something more serious because of the trailers we saw and things we read. ---------- Thanks for a wonderful column, Jon Bass WTS Bureau Systems, Inc. PI is broad farce, and if you see it as anything else it will not be very good, of course. As a serious movie it's just awful, but it's one heck of a satiric farce. I presume it was intended to be. Thanks for the kind words.
|