Things to Come: Gloomy Dancing View 684 20110720

View 684 Wednesday, July 20, 2011

· The Deficit Debates: outcome

· Doom, Gloom, and the future

· Albert Jay Nock on liberty

clip_image002

Things to Come

The Deficit Dance will continue. When it’s over, we will raise the deficit limit. We will pledge to cut spending, and there will be a great deal of self congratulations over the pledges. Some programs will not increase quite so much, and that will be called a big cut. We will raise taxes in order to get the pledge to cut spending.

The Department of Agriculture will continue to send out inspectors to see that stage magicians who use rabbits in their acts have Federal Permits to do so. People who sell rabbits as pets will continue to be shaken down for Federal Permits, although those who raise rabbits for restaurants, or who sell rabbits as food for serpents, do not need the permit. Incidentally, the simplest way to continue to sell rabbits out of your back yard is to get each purchaser to certify that this rabbit will be fed to a snake or a komodo dragon or a human gourmand, but will not be loved and kept as a pet. Show that to the Federal Inspector, and contemplate that the Inspector probably makes more money than nearly anyone who is selling rabbits out of his back yard. And probably more than the stage magician.

The Department of Education will continue to maintain a Special Weapons and Tactics team, which it can use to raid people’s houses at dawn in search of education fraud perpetrators whether they live at that house or not. It will probably hire some new people as the Department gets automatic increases.

Whoever enforces the Consumer Products “safety” standards will hire more people to harass bicycle and toy makers, driving what little manufacturing that still exists in the United States out of the country. Retailers will be harassed as the standard goes from the present 300 parts per million of lead in bicycles to 100 parts per million, and those involved in the toy industry, already shaken by the imposition of the 300 parts per million rule on everything in their inventory will have further burdens as they try to prove that everything they have in stock meets this new standard. More inspectors will be hired. The number of firms they inspect will decrease as more are driven out of business. Big companies will absorb the new costs, and chuckle as their smaller competitors fold. Toy prices will rise. Employment in the toy industry in the United States will fall.

The unemployment rate will continue to be officially at 9% or so; the real rate will continue to be higher as more people stay unemployed year after year.

More regulations will be promulgated. More federal employees will be hired to enforce them. No one will ask much less answer the question “Is this something we ought to be borrowing money to do? Could we get along without this?”

All over the government life will go on. Some government workers will get less overtime and will have to find other income or actually cut back on their standard of living. All will get smaller cost of living increases, but they will keep their jobs and pensions and health care.

Taxes will rise, and the economy will continue to suffer from high energy costs and excessive regulation.

clip_image002[1]

Gloom

I don’t mean to be excessively gloomy. This is what will happen this year. The only remedy to this mess is a return to sanity. The present Administration believes that hope and change means more government control, and that any cut in government is a threat to meaningful change; bunny inspectors are part of progress, as are inspectors to be sure that children can safely eat bicycles and children’s books, and unsafe old CAT IN THE HAT volumes printed before the new benign regulations will be destroyed. Government is good, and more is better. So long as this sentiment prevails in the White House, the Kabuki theater will continue.

Obama will insist on strings to be attached to any permission to raise the debt limit; those strings will let him spend more money, not do drastic cuts in spending.

I don’t know the details of what will happen, but we will survive it. America is going to get the government it deserves and it will get it good and hard. We are going to have to take an economic dose of salts. We will have to stop Washington from spending all that money. If something can’t go on forever, it will stop.

As to our overseas adventures, if something cannot go on forever, it will stop. The Kabuki dance can’t go on forever. Hope and Change can’t go on forever.

clip_image002[2]

If you have not seen Albert Jay Nock’s essay on just what happened with the New Deal, it may provide you with some illumination as to what is going on now.

I believe that when the historian looks back on the last 20 years of American life, the thing that will puzzle him most is the amount of self-inflicted punishment that Americans seem able to stand. They take it squarely on the chin at the slightest provocation and do not even wait for the count before they are back for more.

True, they have always been good at it. For instance, once on a time they were comparatively a free people, regulating a large portion of their lives to suit themselves. They had a great deal of freedom as compared with other peoples of the world.

But apparently they could not rest until they threw their freedom away. They made a present of it to their own politicians, who have made them sweat for their gullibility ever since. They put their liberties in the hands of a praetorian guard made up exactly on the old Roman model, and not only never got them back, but as long as that praetorian guard of professional politicians lives and thrives – which will be quite a while if its numbers keep on increasing at the present rate – they never will.

There is considerably more. Nock understood that freedom is not free.

clip_image002[2]

You wrote: "America is going to get the government it deserves and it will get it good and hard."

I vehemently and strenuously disagree. America — or more correctly my generation and the next few — will get the government the Boomers deserved. It takes time for decisions to take effect

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Nock would disagree: the decision to trade in liberty for something else was made long ago. There were several opportunitied for recovery and trend reversal, particularly with Reagan, and later with the Gingrich recovery of Congress, but the opportunities were squandered in favor of “big government conservatism” whatever that is. Now we continue to learn: freedom is not free. Free men are not equal, Equal men are not free. The universe is not always fair. All too often

the race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all.

We believed that with enough government all things would be possible: that inequality is a “social problem” and all social problems can be “solved” with government action. Alas, the only actions government can take involve creating bureaucracies and spending money. Bureaucracies act in their own manner through the Iron Law of Bureaucracy. Once created they may or may not do what they were created to do, but they will do. They will continue to do long after the need for their original creation has vanished. They will do even if their very existence harms the purpose for which they were founded. They will protect their existence at nearly any cost. Das Buros stehen immer.

The prevailing sentiment in this country, both the Boomer generation and yours, appears to be that there are “problems” and they can be “solved” by government; that government is the answer, not the problem. Over time some become enlightened. Perhaps we are learning. Perhaps we can cease to sow the wind; but the current Deficit Dance is not encouraging. The only encouragement I see is that more and more of the population is beginning to understand that not all “problems” can or even should be “solved” by government action: That that is not only a limit to the power of government to fix things, but good reason to believe that too much government breaks things. There may be a trend back toward freedom. We’ll just have to see.

clip_image002[3]

In one of my science fiction series I postulate the CoDominium, a formal arrangement in which the United States and the Soviet Union divide the world (and the small part of interstellar space accessible to them). They hate each other, but they fear outsiders more. They have devised a system to maintain power. One part of it is the Bureau of Relocation, which moves large groups of people, sending some out to interstellar colonies. There is also a Bureau of Science whose task is to suppress inventions that might threaten the CoDominium. Unlicensed scientists may be turned over to BuReloc.

Now it appears that the demise of the Soviet Union may not have precluded the formation of BuReloc.

CoDo BuReloc?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/
environment/2011/jul/20/
un-climate-change-peacekeeping

Jim. crawford

Note that once such a Bureau is created, it will be governed by the Iron Law. Will our Legions be involved in enforcement? We may be sure that we will not invade China to close unlicensed coal plants, of course; but an international bureau would be happy to use the US Courts to accomplish the same thing in West Virginia. It is not known what will be the fate of AGW Deniers under the new peace keeping mandate. Could Deniers be charged and transported to The Hague for trial and imprisonment? One is tempted to laugh at such absurdities, but stranger things have happened.

Incidentally, there is an explication of the Iron Law in action in a discussion of net neutrality here. Participants include John Dvorak, Leo Laporte, Larry Magid, and me.

 

 

 

clip_image002[3]

clip_image005

clip_image002[3]

3D Printers; deficit debates; poor enough Mail 683 20110719

Mail 683 Tuesday, July 19, 2011

· 3D Printers

· Deficit Debates

·

clip_image002

3D Printers

Jerry,

We bought a 3D printer from Z-Corp about 5 years ago ($70,000) and it does make the models. The problem we have with the printer is that if we make scaled models of our structures the models break before we can remove the powder. Unless they have improved the binder I don’t see how it’s possible to reach into the powder and remove the wrench without breaking the model. The binder is used to hold the powder together then the extra powder is removed an super glue or epoxy is applied. If you want, I can send some pictures of the models we have made, it’s no hoax.

Regards,

Curtis Owens

I never seriously thought it was a hoax or that it would not prove to be important. The news to me is how far along we are already.

= =

3d printing

They are called Fabers. One of my USB core customers is Stratasys which makes the competing product to the one on the you tube video. Both companies have made products for several years in the 100K class price range. Both companies are pushing the price point down. We will all have one on our desk sooner rather than later. A friend of mine makes high end telescope mounts. His newest model was completely designed in Solid Works, a 3D cad program for mechanical design. He designed and simulated the mount before the first piece of metal was cut. He did not use a faber, but he could have used one to "print" his design and have a working model. The model, of course, would not have been made of metal and would not have been suitable as a heavy telescope mount, but he could have printed an accurate model that would have moved.

Phil

= = =

Dentistry and 3D Printing

My dentist has a system (for a couple of years now) that works like this:

For crowns (I have had four done this way) he uses a scanner to map the surface contours of your existing tooth. This is done with some datums taken for use later. He then manually, and in about 10 minutes, touches up the contour scan to eliminate/check for spurious artifacts.

The next step is to mill down the tooth to prepare for the crown. The scanner is synched to the existing datums and maps the recontoured tooth.

The software then mates the inner and outer contours to produce a 3D model of the crown. A CNC control file is then generated, which is fed to a small machining center. The machining center, about 1 ft by 1 ft by two feet in size, has , I think, about 7 degrees of freedom and uses small ball end cutting tools to mill out the crown from a block of green ceramic which is premounted on a spindle. The machine has two cutting spindles and cuts from two sides at once. Fascinating to watch! When finished the crown is separated from it’s mount and fired to proper hardness in a small oven. Elapsed time is about 50 minutes for the machining and firing.

In my case, two crowns fitted and finished, with excellent matching against the mating teeth, in about 4 hours. The machines and software, all PC based, are about $450,000 as a complete system. Charge for the crowns is about $1600 each. The dentist can run about 4 patients a day with proper staging of the appointments, so it is a money maker with good patient results.

Best regards,

John Witt

And the conclusion is that we are closer to Minsky’s ‘Thingmaker” than ever we thought.

clip_image002[1]

Deficits History

Jerry,

RE historic deficit sizes, the chart at http://logisticsmonster.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/deficitgraph.jpg is worth a look – it gives deficits by year through 2010, in both dollars and as a percent of GDP.

That "Largest Deficit In History" (less than a third of current levels) under Bush was in 2004. Interestingly, and little-mentioned, deficits dropped steadily after that through 2007.

Things started heading skyward again in 2008, allowing Dems to say "this started under Bush", but I expect the key factor there was actually Pelosi-Reid taking over the Congress in 2007. Congress writes the checks, Presidents only cash them. FY’08 was the Dem Congress’s first budget, and it shows. Then in ’09 we added Obama in the White House asking for a stimulus, and the era of trillion-dollar deficits had arrived.

My take is, Bush gets more blame than he deserves, and going along with this only helps the Dems obfuscate their responsibility for the current mess. Which in turn only encourages them in their current campaign to extend the mess till after the election next year.

Henry

I do not see this as a blame fixing thing. I have no brief for the Country Club Republicans with their crazy spending spree, and the fact that it wasn’t as bad as it could be, and that the Left predictably spent even more isn’t as important as that nothing seems to be halting the trend. Either you believe in liberty – which is to say that government isn’t the optimum means of allocating investment – or you don’t. More and more don’t. The argument that government ought to take any money lying around to spend as government wants, and that this is ‘fair’ so long as it soaks ‘the rich’ seems to be gathering strength.

I don’t want to fix blame, I want freedom back. Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.

= = =

factcheck.org

I offer this:

http://factcheck.org/2011/07/fiscal-factcheck/

“Washington’s spending has recently been higher as a percentage of the nation’s economic output than at any time since World War II. But by the same measure, Washington’s revenues are the lowest in more than 60 years.

“So does the U.S. have "a spending problem," as Republicans keep repeating in the current debate over how to reduce the nation’s record deficits? Or is the problem that taxes are not high enough? Those questions frame a long-running partisan debate, and as usual we won’t offer an opinion one way or the other. But for those seeking their own answers, we can offer some fiscal history and factual context.” <snip>

Mark

The argument is essentially that revenue as a percentage of GDP is very low, and more taxes are fair: we can afford all this spending, we just need to raise taxes in order to pay for it.

Obviously I don’t believe that, but the argument is made. As for me, I want to eliminate the bunny inspectors, and a great deal of other stuff that the government is doing for us. I want to restore the Republic of de Tocqueville in which citizens and associations did most of the civic functions, not government. Give me liberty…

= = =

The Debt Ceiling debate in US

Hi Jerry

I came across this blog recently and have found the content riveting. From the global warming climate debate, to war in the Middle East and central Asia, to the domestic concerns of the USA. As a Canadian living close to the border, local news from New York often times feels like local news just down the block from Oakville where I hale from (just west of Toronto).

Here is my take 2 cents for what it is worth, as an outside observer. Obama is well on his way to herding the GOP elephant into another political box, in which it will be perceived by the independent vote — which seems to control all Presidential elections, but not the Congressional majorities — as close to treasonous.

History operates in a long arc, and as you point out on your site often, in the greater sceme of things this too may pass.

But as a fiscal conservative what is happening in the US makes one apprehensive. That a great nation and the last defender of free market principles is being hurt in the process only renders the tragedy more painful.

Gold at $1600 an ounce may be a commentary on the behaviour of the Fed; but you can’t eat the stuff. One must take with a grain of salt any politician who says we have a plan to balance the budget in five years. What can one say about politicians who have no plan to ever balance the budget?

My best to you….

Sam Mattina

They show no means for getting rid of the bunny inspectors, either. And it’s a joke that the shovels weren’t as ready as we supposed. Let’s go borrow more mone. We are only borrowing $180,000,000 an hour now…

clip_image002[2]

The article puts an important point most clearly

Being poor in America is NOT being homeless on the street. It’s just a whole lot better than being poor in Brazil or most any other country.

63.7% of our "poor" have cable service. 38.2% have computers. 48.6% have coffee makers.

Being poor isn’t what it used to be http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/07/being-poor-isnt-what-it-used-be

If I recall correctly the official definition of "poor" in America is the bottom X% of the nation’s incomes set as a dollar figure. If it is set as a percentage of all incomes you can never spend you way into being a nation with nobody in poverty. You’ll always have X% poor. So poor that 78.3% have air conditioners. 32.2% have 3 or more TVs.

Click through to http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/07/what-is-poverty to see a full report.

This is nonsense. We need to set the bar at say "air conditioning" rather than at jacuzzi (0.6%). They can bloody well do their own dishes (25%).

{^_^}

I would go further. While no one should be starving, poverty is primarily a local problem, and is best left to civic pride and charity. It is not charity to send the public hangman to collect money to give to the poor. We can institutionalize a safety net, but what we are building is not a net.

clip_image002[3]

clip_image004

clip_image005

Dentists and dancing inspectors View 684 20110719

View 684 Tuesday, July 19, 2011

· 3d Printing and Dentistry

· The Dance Continues, with bunnies and now cows

clip_image002

If you didn’t see my interview with Glenn Reynolds on the Last Shuttle, it’s here.

I have a dental appointment today. Oddly enough it involves something that would definitely profit from my dentist having a 3D printer as described in yesterday’s Mail.

Today I got

3D printing luddites.

The video you linked to is now a part of a new internet meme, wherein the entire field of 3D printing is being called a hoax…because of the way the video was edited and because of the manner in which the technology was presented.

Almost everyone is using, or has benefitted from, a product that was proto-typed in whole or in part by 3D printing. Yet, many people who use those same products on a daily basis think that the technology is a hoax?!

The technology is so disruptive that people are having difficulty facing the reality.

Wait’ll they see what’s happening with nano-biotech. That oughta be fun to watch!

Warren Bonesteel

When I did my Googling on 3d Hoax what I mostly found was convincing arguments that the technology is real; I didn’t see anything convincing to the contrary. It’s with us and more coming. I’d think dentistry would be a major use for this.

clip_image003

The largest year deficit in history was the Bush $500 Billion deficit, but that was dwarfed by the latest Obama deficit: it is now estimated to be $1.65 Trillion. That’s Trillion with a T, the largest deficit in the history of mankind. The Wall Street Journal has an op ed “America’s Debt-Ceiling Opportunity” trying to see the bright side of some of this, but it’s actually chilling. The President continues to act as if failing to increase spending on various projects is the same as failing to send Social Security and Veteran Benefit checks. He insists that the only remedy is to raise revenue, with symbolic “cuts”. This turns out to be a continuation of tax and spend, and none of it would eliminate bunny inspectors, Department of Education SWAT teams, etc. Of course if we eliminate the Department of Education – if the House simply refused to fund it, appropriating no money whatever for the Department of Education – we could not only save a lot of money but possibly save a few schools. Leave education to the States. They can’t do much worse that we are doing now, and some might even do a lot better, saving money while educating kids; others might see something work and try it. The United States spends more per pupil than any nation in the world with the possible exception of Luxembourg; and we don’t get much for that. Try something else.

Now that would help reduce the deficit and might even help the pupils. Of course no one will try that. The “solution” to our lousy schools is always the same, pour in more money. Don’t fire incompetent teachers, but perhaps we can give a hand to those whose education was wrecked by a tenured teacher?

And of course nothing will eliminate the bunny Inspectors. Instead we have proposals to expand those activities. We can borrow more money to federalize agriculture.

The Chicken Inspectors Are Coming –

Now the USDA will implement new rules for egg production similar to what California did with Prop 2.

It’s not just bunnies. We have to stop this cruelty to chickens. Surely the have a right to be free and the Feds must be called in to enforce it….

Law would be first federal legislation addressing treatment of animals on farms

Release Date: 07 July 2011

The United Egg Producers and the Humane Society of the United States http://www.humanesociety.org/ have partnered to work toward the enactment of federal legislation that would set national standards for hens involved in U.S. egg production. The proposed standards, if enacted, would be the first federal law addressing the treatment of animals on farms.

The two groups will jointly ask Congress for federal legislation which would require egg producers to increase space per bird in a tiered phase-in, with the amount of space birds are given increasing, in intervals, over the next 15 to 18 years. Currently, the majority of birds are each provided 67 square inches of space, with roughly 50 million receiving 48 square inches. The proposed phase-in would culminate with hens nationwide being provided a minimum of 124–144 square inches of space, along with the other improvements noted.

http://layer-cages.com/2011/07/08/egg-growing-and-layer-cage-conditions-to-change-in-usa/

Surely a whole new arm of USDA chicken house inspectors will be needed.

First the bunnies, then the chickens, tomorrow the pigs and cows.

Dave K

And of course any attempt to cut back on the expansion of these activities is a “cut” and balancing the budget on the backs of – well, of something. Perhaps not the poor. Dumb animals. Whatever. We need to borrow more money, because there is a problem that we have to fix, and Federal Inspectors are the only way to fix it.

While we are at it we can expand the budget of the BATF so that it can sell more guns to Mexican cartels in order to track where they go.

And the Dance goes on.

clip_image004

clip_image006

clip_image007

3D printer, bunnies, and other matters Mail 684 20110718

Mail 684 Monday, July 18, 2011

· 3D Printer

· The bunny story

· Borders

·

clip_image002

3D Printer

Some of you have seen this, and others haven’t.

Here’s one of the futures of computing. Very cool!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZboxMsSz5Aw

We saw prototypes at CES this year. Remarkable! Really cool

clip_image003

On bunnies

Dear Dr. Pournelle:

Here’s some more bunny-related idiocy for you to contemplate.

http://biggovernment.com/bmccarty/2011/05/20/family-facing-4-million-in-fines-for-selling-bunnies/

Regards,

Tim Scott=

Actually we have seen this story before but it does no harm to be reminded of it. The program has to cost millions of dollars a year in borrowed money, yet there appears to be no off switch. There just isn’t any way to get rid of silliness like this. It goes on and on, at millions a year, and you can’t stop it.

clip_image002[1]

Birth Certificate Forgery

You’ve probably heard this about five hundred times by now, but they’re referring to the Dan Rather "Texas ANG Memo" scandal, dubbed "Rathergate".

The "birth certificate variable type" is much less convincing. It depends on quibbling over whether a blotchy reproduction of a typed character on a 40-year-old piece of paper is .002" bigger than another.

You say "the people who handled this could have handled it better", but this is like the "9/11 Truth" movement. It doesn’t matter how well you handle it, because the people who want the certificate to be fake will just find other ways to convince themselves it’s fake.

Mike T. Powers

It’s a distraction. If that turns out to be a forgery and can be shown to be one, it says a lot about the competence of the forgers, but not much about the birthplace of Barrack Hussein Obama.

clip_image004

Borders left the business:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303661904576454353768550280.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

——–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

First the chains took over the independent book stores, then the big stores drove the chains out of the malls. Now the chains devour each other. The distributors went from a couple of hundred to about 3. The publishing business implodes and concentrates. We watch in fascination or horror. Or both.

clip_image002[2]

Surveillance Grid Goes Green

It took Americans 30 years to figure out that Don King rigs his

fights. How long before they figure this con out?

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/07/18/city-testing-new-technology-aimed-at-reducing-traffic-congestion/

——–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Probably not a lot longer.

clip_image003[1]

Too Big to Fail

"Any enterprise that is too big to fail should be too big to be allowed to exist."

And at what point does the US government become "too big to fail"?

Karl

Clever

clip_image003[2]

CERN ‘gags’ physicists in cosmic ray climate experiment

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/18/cern_cosmic_ray_gag/

CERN ‘gags’ physicists in cosmic ray climate experiment

What do these results mean? Not allowed to tell you

The chief of the world’s leading physics lab at CERN in Geneva has prohibited scientists from drawing conclusions from a major experiment.

= = =

clip_image003[3]

Slide show of Bert Rutan’s designs

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/18/rutan_bipod/

Cool!

clip_image003[4]

Money we don’t need

Hello Jerry,

Well, it is official: "All your money and stuff are belong to us!".

The ‘us’ in question being the government. Of course we will be

allowed to keep what we ‘need’, but THEY will be the self-appointed

arbiters of that need.

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/07/13/morning-bell-obama-aims-for-the-money-you-dont-need/

Bob Ludwick

The theory is that government will spend any surplus funds better than those who have the money, and after all, those who have it probably don’t deserve it. I vaguely remember thinking that way when I was an undergraduate. Lyndon Johnson spoke of the haves and how they had to give up some for the have nots who need it so much. It is standard undergraduate socialism. Most undergraduates grew out of it in my time. Not so much now.

clip_image006

image