Cases and keyboards

View 718 Monday, March 26, 2012

clip_image002

We are working on the new Sandy Bridge machine. I have a huge pile of components from Thermaltake, including a power supply that Eric says would power a village, and the most spectacular case I have ever seen. It will all be in the column.

There’s also a gamer’s keyboard. It has mechanical keys, and they feel great, but it also has the compact layout that, I guess, killer gamers prefer: that layout is too small for me. I love the key feel, but I want the keys further apart; but then my goal is not to be a gaming challenger. This keyboard is for killers, with its high polling race, and I suppose gamers like keyboards with a more compact layout. I’m impressed with this Ttesports MEKA by Thermaltake, but it won’t be the keyboard that replaced my wonderful old Ortek.

I’ve been making do on most of my systems with Microsoft Comfort Curve keyboards, and I do like them, but the keys don’t feel right compared to my wonderful old Ortek. I sure wish I had bought half a dozen of these old keyboards when they were available, but as time goes on machines are more and more demanding USB keyboards, which of course the Ortek wasn’t.

I have a ton of mail on this subject and I am sure I will get more, but I still haven’t decided what I’m going to do about the keyboard situation.

What I need is a full sized keyboard, not curved – I thought I liked curved but I seem to be able to type faster with straight lines – and clicky. I like having programmable keys. And I want a full sized layout.

clip_image002[1]

Construction of the new machine continues. We’re using the Thermaltake case. It’s costly – but I already wish I had had that available when we built Emily, the Intel Extreme system that this new one will replace. I am fond of Antec cases, and they have been standard at Chaos Manor for years, but the model we chose for Emily turns out to have been an experimental design that just didn’t work. It attempted to do what the Thermaltake has done – make it very easy to maintain and upgrade hardware on a high end system. Full writeup coming, but I would have paid for this Thermaltake case when we were building Emily had I But Known. It is really designed to make life easier for those who have to update and maintain high end systems. So far we have not got the system done so I can’t recommend it yet, but I love the design. The Thermaltake is so fancy in presentation that you at first don’t appreciate the design features which make it easy to get at the components and change them without having to use tools and pull the system out of its installation. And the internal cable routings and such are very nice. More when we finish it but my first impressions are highly favorable, and while the cost is high, anyone who has to maintain high end systems will realize that it’s worth money to save time and frustration – or so I have learned trying to keep Emily up to snuff.

Again more later when we have got the new system running, but as Eric just noted, it’s a bit like building a sports car and finding out that they’ve really worked on making the maintenance easy.

We have had a brushup caused by a bad DVD blank disk (a generic – don’t use them!) rendering Emily unusable then requiring a restart from power down, and of course the horrible case – again you can’t buy one of that design, it was a temporary and it seemed pretty good when we installed it, but it uses a goofy hinge front system that breaks easily – anyway the horrid case cost an hour of mucking about getting Emily running again so we could burn a Windows 8 disk. Finally all is well.

clip_image002[2]

The Florida Zimmerman/Martin case continues to take up time and energy, but it is clear enough to me that there are unresolved – perhaps unresolvable – ambiguities, and we aren’t going to settle it on general principles. We have a conflict of rights situation, and the details matter. Martin had every right to walk through the neighborhood. Zimmerman acted a bit like a snoop but apparently didn’t threaten Martin; if there was any interaction it’s not reported. And then everything went to hell.

If ever there was a matter for local authorities to sort out, this is it; and there is no reason for all this national attention. But this is an election year and we have a President desperate for an incident to raise his popularity above the deadly 43% mark. Perhaps this can be made into something. And here we go.

In the meantime there have been dozens of homicides in the US. And there will be more.

clip_image002[3]

Bill Gates seems impressed with the rising CO2 enough that he prefers nuclear power to natural gas. So do I. I agree that we don’t want to run an open ended experiment on how much CO2 we can put into the atmosphere. On the other hand, India’s cows can produce enough CO2 to keep the atmospheric amount rising. If we seriously have to eliminate CO2 additions to below what the ecological system can absorb we are talking about really drastic measures.

More likely we come up with some means of increasing the ecological reduction of CO2 amounts. The method that used to be discussed was adding iron to the sea to cause plankton blooms. A couple of experiments give less promising results than enthusiasts had expected. After that the experiments seem to have stopped. I have lost track of why. I’ll see if I can find out. Clearly, if we are going to limit the CO2 in the atmosphere, we have to find ways to take it out, or change the way we live. Drastically. And probably limit population. That is a formula for war without end.

clip_image003

clip_image002[10]

clip_image002[11]

clip_image005

clip_image002[12]

If I had a keyboard; journalism; and voodoo

View 718 Sunday, March 25, 2012

I spent most of the day doing chores, then out to the annual Paperback fair where Niven and I signed books until our hands were tired. After which came what has become an annual dinner with Niven and me and Tim Powers and John DeChancie and whomever else we find as congenial company. Which got me home to more errands.

As I start to get back up to speed – I’ll be resuming the Chaos Manor Reviews columns shortly – I find that much of Chaos Manor is, if not obsolete, way behind the times. One thing that needs replacing are my main keyboards. Most of my keyboards, such as the Ortek MCK142 Programmable, are getting really old. The Ortek still works, and I love it –it’s got a clicky feel, and it just works except that I have used it for so long that the legends are gone from the keys – but it’s slowly wearing out. It’s time to replace it, but when I went looking I found it had been discontinued years ago.

Then I went looking for keyboard reviews, and I kept finding references to my own. Apparently nobody is writing the kind of informed opinion reviews I used to write, so it’s time for me to start doing them again. One place to start it keyboards. I Googled Keyboard Reviews and got a lot of references but they all turned out to be pretty tame, no real descriptions, and not much about the touch and feel, meaning that it’s time for me to go scouting again. I want a keyboard that will take a lot of pounding, and has a feel to it so that when you hit a key you know you have done it. It feels like it worked. I suppose that’s in part due to old habits – in the old days, computers might be so slow that I would be looking at the screen but what came up on it would be several letters or even a couple of words behind what I was typing. In these days of lots of memory and multiple processors that doesn’t happen much anymore, but I still like to have a definite feel to my keyboards.

I’ve been happy enough with Microsoft Keyboards for a while, but for my communications machine I like to have a programmable keyboard so I can set it up to send some standard comments and messages. Of course I could do that with macros (well, depending on what program I am using, and the latest Word is nowhere near as macro friendly as the old versions I grew up with), but I rather like the Ortek with its rows of PF(Programmable Function keys above the regular function keys. But Ortek doesn’t make them any longer, and when I went looking for keyboard reviews I didn’t find any that I was much happy with. Next move, I suppose, is to head out to Fry’s and see what they have in stock, since I missed CES this year.

And, we have a Beta copy of Windows 8 operating, and it looks interesting. It seems to be set up for people who use touchpads rather than mice, and will understand gestures, but you don’t gesture with a mouse. That’s all intriguing. So I went looking for descriptions and reviews of mushpad keyboards, and found not very much.

I’d have thought someone would have rushed in to fill the hole I left when I got later and later with my reviews and columns, but if so I haven’t found him. Or her. Or it. And I’m getting my energy back finally, so…

Anyway, we’ll be building some new stuff and updating software here at Chaos Manor and sort of generally catching up; I find that a lot has happened since I stopped paying so much attention to things. All that will be in the column which I’ll resume Real Soon Now if my days don’t continue to be eaten by locusts. And of course there’s my taxes, and I have to prepare for the big Air Force Space Command seminar/conference I’m supposed to be part of in a week. And it’s raining in Los Angeles.

I sure can type faster on this Ortek than on most other keyboards including the Microsoft comfort curve boards. I like the Microsoft, but I wish they had a clickier feel; I just don’t type as fast on them as I do on this wonderful old Ortek. So now I have to go find something to replace it. Preferably a line of keyboards with the right clicky feel so I can put them on all the machines I’ll be using. Since the keyboards I have are using the old keyboard port connectors rather than USB you can see they’re old, and anyway this will all be in the upcoming column.

clip_image002

Spending the day signing books doesn’t get you very well informed, but I did have to drive out there and back, and the radio was buzzing with stories about the Florida shooting. I wondered about it when it happened: when the story first broke it was clear we didn’t know enough to have any right to a conclusion. I still don’t think we do. It’s pretty clear that Zimmerman was chasing the seventeen year old young man, and the youngster tried to get away from him. The police told Zimmerman that “we don’t need you to pursue him” but I have not heard any stronger command from the 911 operator than that. Apparently – it seems fairly probable – the pursuit continued until at some point the young man ceased trying to get away – whatever that means – and a confrontation took place. At which point the stories go out in all directions. There was some kind of fight, someone cried for help, and Zimmerman fired at least one shot. And the police, after investigation, did not charge Zimmerman.

Now there will be a special prosecutor, which is ominous – that is, a special prosecutor implies there is something to prosecute, and the Iron Law of Bureaucracy can easily creep into the situation. If there is no crime there is nothing to prosecute and the special prosecutor no longer has a mission. We have seen at the Federal level that once there’s a special prosecutor the odds go way up that things will continue until someone pleads guilty to something. I don’t know how such things work in Florida – I don’t think I have read more than one crime procedural novel taking place in Florida – and it may be that special prosecutors are not so special there, but in most places they are easier to set up than to call off.

We’ll see. It’s not really my business. It’s not really the business of the President of the United States, either. I doubt he knows much more for certain than I do, and I sure don’t feel I have any right to an opinion on the subject. It seems certain that Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin. It’s nearly certain that Zimmerman was far more zealous than we expect – or more us want – a neighborhood watch captain to be. ; and everything else gets cloudy. I don’t really expect the media scrutiny to make it much clearer. The old fashioned reporter seems to have vanished, and those who took over don’t seem to have the same motives that the Fourth Estate.

In old days men had the rack. Now they have the Press. That is an improvement certainly. But still it is very bad, and wrong, and demoralizing. Somebody — was it Burke? — called journalism the fourth estate. That was true at the time no doubt. But at the present moment it is the only estate. It has eaten up the other three. The Lords Temporal say nothing, the Lords Spiritual have nothing to say, and the House of Commons has nothing to say and says it. We are dominated by Journalism. – Oscar Wilde

clip_image003

Those interested in the climate debate should find http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/23/warm_period_little_ice_age_global/print.html fascinating.

A proper temperature record for Antarctica is particularly interesting, as it illuminates one of the main debates in global-warming/climate-change: namely, were the so-called Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age merely regional, or were they global events? The medieval warmup experienced by northern Europeans from say 900AD to 1250AD seems to have been at least as hot as anything seen in the industrial era. If it was worldwide in extent that would strongly suggest that global warming may just be something that happens from time to time, not something caused by miniscule concentrations of CO2 (the atmosphere is 0.04 per cent CO2 right now; this figure might climb to 0.07 per cent in the medium term).

The oft-mentioned "scientific consensus", based in large part on the work of famous climate-alarmist scientists Michael Mann and Phil Jones and reflected in the statements [1] of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), says that isn’t true. The IPCC consensus is that the medieval warming – and the "Little Ice Age" which followed it – only happened in Europe and maybe some other northern areas. They were local events only, and globally the world was cooler than it is now. The temperature increase seen in the latter half of the 20th century is a new thing caused by humanity’s carbon emissions.

Lu and his colleagues’ new work, however, indicates that in fact the medieval warm period and little ice age were both felt right down to Antarctica.

We know that it was warmer in Greenland, France, Scotland, Scandinavia, and China. Well, by “know” I mean that it is very easily inferred from records like growing seasons, crop yields, dates of first frost and of ice breakup in streams, and the like. This extends the inferential data to the Southern Hemisphere. It is unlikely that the Medieval Warm was caused by increases in CO2 levels, and even if it were, that the CO2 came from human activities…

clip_image002[1]

The European Union According to Hayek by Alberto Mingardi is well worth your attention. It is the conceit of the voodoo sciences that we understand the world in some scientific way, and that applies to economics and economic systems. Hayek and the Austrians argue that we don’t. The regulators are certain they do. The results are usually quite horrid.

Friedrich August Hayek, who passed away 20 years ago this week, was one of the foremost social scientists of the last century. A Nobel laureate in economics, Hayek is often associated with his critique of socialist systems. There is, in society, a "knowledge problem": Economic life requires the coordination of individual planning. The relevant knowledge for economic planning is dispersed rather than concentrated in society. If this makes coordination challenging enough in a market system, it also makes coordination a virtual impossibility under central planning: The planner can never secure and process all the necessary information to provide detailed guidance to any given development in society.

Even though this argument was originally deployed against hard-core socialism, it works pretty well against the soft-core version widely adopted by European democracies. Centralized welfare systems are necessarily run by a bureaucratic leadership. The supposed technical superiority of such an organization is simply not enough to master the nuances of a complex society.

clip_image002[2]

And it’s late. Good night.

clip_image002[3]

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

China, Afghanistan, dreams, and operations research: a mailbag

Mail 717 Saturday, March 24, 2012

· China Coup

· Bell Labs

· VIP’s

· Red Tails

· Operations Research

· Ornithopter

· Jobs, Gates, and dreams

· Nation Building

·

clip_image002

SUBJ: Chinese economic stability

Jerry –

It has been several days since you mentioned rumors of a Chinese coup, and it seems fairly clear that they were unfounded. However, your comment that "China’s economic boom is said to be faltering, but that’s a slowing of growth, not an actual collapse." is true, but not necessarily relevant. A polysci course I took some time ago invoked the Davies’ J-Curve to explain why revolutions often succeed when things don’t seem to be all that bad. It’s all about expectations and perceptions. As a related condition in the US, I suspect that Obama’s chances of reelection will depend on his ability to get folks to evaluate their economic condition in terms of last year ("what have you done for me lately?"), rather than before he took office.

Regards,

Jim Martin

 

That’s the classic theory on revolution, and Marx dealt with it a bit; but it depends on the structure of the society that is undergoing the revolution. China hasn’t really followed that pattern, and sometimes it’s difficult to distinguish between a revolution and a coup, or either from a revolt of janissaries. Some African ‘revolutions’ were engineered, and certainly one failed attempt at a coup by foreign invaders led by rather famous mercenaries would have been a ‘revolution’ to the world had it succeeded.

China’s history is more one of changes in dynasty, and contests between war lords. Sun Yat Sen led a real revolution in 1911 that established the Republic of China in name, but in fact the country was torn apart into semi-independent provinces under war lords. The Communists were active in forming a national party, as was Sun Yat Sen with his socialist nationalism. The Japanese invasion broke things apart even more and for a while there was a genuine three-way war between the Japanese invaders, Chiang Kai-shek and his Kuomintang (usually referred to as Nationalists). After World War II there was a vicious civil war, extraordinary inflation, and a collapse of central government that ended when Chiang took his army to Formosa (which had been liberated from the Japanese mostly by the US Navy).

That’s not much of a history: the point is that China never had a revolution in the usual Western sense of the word. Both the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang claimed to be the people’s party with revolutionary goals, and both organized armies. Both professed reforms, and both were corrupt. Both were in essence dictatorships under their party leader, and both had support from foreign powers (US and USSR).

Historically China has often solved insurgencies by the “two province” system – take all the food from one province and distribute it to the people of the other. One starves and can’t rebel, and the other is dependent and grateful. There are also divisions along racial lines. The current CCP rules through an extraordinary party organization system; the only effective opposition to the party would be the People’s Liberation Army, which is a political and economic power as well as an army.

As to the US economy and elections, elections matter less and less as the regulatory authority of the central government expands. I remember when the only Federal official who mattered in Shelby County, Tennessee, was the Agriculture Department County Agent, and even after Pearl Harbor the federal government was far away and didn’t much interfere with daily life.

clip_image002[1]

_The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation_

<http://www.amazon.com/Idea-Factory-American-Innovation-ebook/dp/B005GSZIWG/>

Roland Dobbins

– – –

Subj: Bell Labs, scale and innovation

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/294143/bell-labs-scale-and-innovation-jim-manzi

>>[B]y the 1980s, Silicon Valley, math-intensive finance and similar

>>ecosystems were exploding. Talented, ambitious young people could go

>>to these places, and make both a huge individual impact and a ton of

>>money. The Labs still had a lot of smart people, but you can imagine

>>the selection-bias problems in recruiting and retention once these

>>alternatives were available.<<

Perhaps Pournelle’s Law of Bureaucracy applied to Bell Labs, too?

Perhaps we need to think in terms of stimulating the creation of new industrial labs — and the creative destruction of old, degenerated ones

— rather than of trying to preserve old industrial labs as National Treasures?

Rod Montgomery==monty@starfief.com

Bell Labs was an extraordinary institution. There have been many attempts to copy it, but the general consensus is that they have not been very successful. Bell was owned by a private company which wasn’t really private – as a regulated public utility it had its own form of bureaucracy – but Bell management understood that the Lab was different, and its management was quite different from that of The Phone Company.

I would not quarrel with the notion that we need some new creations and creative destruction.

It is possible to have a Strategy of Technology. US Air Force Systems Command was a rather successful attempt to build an institution for creation of technology on demand. It’s gone too.

clip_image002[2]

VIPs

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmoral/articles/20120322.aspx

Why can’t the ride the jump seats (webbed seats) or crammed among the cargo like I (and all my Marines) had to? (Besides can you think of a better campaign photo op?)

clip_image003

Cheap energy = prosperity!

Drill here, DRILL NOW!

David Couvillon

Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, Retired.; Former Governor of Wasit Province, Iraq; Righter of Wrongs; Wrong most of the time; Distinguished Expert, TV remote control; Chef de Hot Dog Excellance; Avoider of Yard Work

I suspect that is not sufficiently dignified for the Command in Chief, or even the Deputy Assistant Associate Secretary of Defense…

clip_image004

Surprise, surprise, surprise!

Hello Jerry,

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/03/17/effective-world-government-will-still-be-needed-to-stave-off-climate-catastrophe/

(Note that the world government must be ‘effective’; ‘totalitarian’

carries SUCH negative vibes.)

But we already knew that 20 years ago when Climate Science, a formerly unknown scientific backwater, burst on the scene with the announcement that CAGW was upon us, the science was settled, that ONLY an omnipotent world government (Marxist of course) could snatch us back from the jaws of disaster, and only if action was taken IMMEDIATELY.

Well, they were right about one thing; climate science was indeed settled 20 years ago. Not surprising when the entire ‘science’ is based on an axiom: ‘CO2 introduced into the atmosphere as a byproduct of humans using combustion as their primary energy source is causing the ‘Temperature of the Earth’ to rise drastically and at in increasing rate. The effects of that temperature rise are uniformly negative and can ONLY be ameliorated by the establishment of a world government with authority over every aspect of energy production and consumption.’

Other sciences, based on a never-ending loop of data collection and theorizing as to the explanation for the observed data rather than a single immutable axiom, are never settled, of course. But then other sciences are actually scientific, unlike ‘climate science’ which is and always has been a political movement which uses the trappings of science and the threat of imminent catastrophe as its justification.

Bob Ludwick

Surprise!

clip_image002[3]

Red Tails

The Tuskegee Airmen gave good, faithful, and valorous service, and deserve to be remembered. But–

As a child in the early Fifties I listened to my father and his contemporaries, all of them Southerners who had "been in the War", and I can say without fear or favor: The Red Tails deserve honor, but if there had been no Red Ball Express — taken as an eponym of the support troops, construction, logistics, and the like, staffed by blacks, which were many — there would have been no Civil Rights movement. The matter-of-fact valor, persistence, and dedication of those units was seen by people who would be the leaders of the next generation, and that was among the first chinks in the dam of irrational prejudice. These were people who sprinkled their conversation with the n-word and worse as a matter of unthinking routine. I often heard things like "I don’t think we could’ve won without the n–rs", and it was such sentiments that allowed people like Dr. King to exist and present their ideas without being simply slapped down.

The romance and importance of aviation in WWII has grown enormously in retrospect, to a level not present among the actual fighters. LeMay and many others engaged in a decades-long PR campaign designed to promote Air Power to a position of glamor and admiration, and largely succeeded, but the citizen-warriors who prosecuted the effort and won thought of the Air Corps as a sort of sideshow, useful in some cases but paling in importance compared to the grunts and sailors who ground out victory one bullet (and one blob of mud) at a time. That includes the pilots, air crew, and support people who prosecuted the war in the air, many, if not most, of whom considered themselves privileged characters lucky to be mostly behind the lines, enjoying many of the comforts of home, and basking in the admiration of the noncombatants they mixed with at the expense of the people who deserved it. Dad and the others knew of the Tuskegee Airmen and praised them as they were due, but thought the truck-driving, shovel-wielding black men who brought, and built, the things needed by the troops were more important.

Regards,

Ric Locke

There is a wonderful movie about the Red Ball Express, by that name actually. It used to be shown to every incoming class at West Point along with They Died with Their Boots On… I say a wonderful movie although I only saw it that once.

clip_image004[1]

Escort Mission

The idea of what the mission actually is was questioned in other areas during the war. The Brits put AA guns on some merchants running solo in the Med. After a few months, the people in charge of the AA guns wanted them removed, because the AA gunners on the merchants weren’t shooting down very many enemy aircraft, and in their view, their effort was being wasted. Then, the people in charge of shipping went- WHOA! The ships with the AA mounted weren’t being sunk- enemy aircraft swerve off when the flak starts up, and the bombs either miss or aren’t released. The cargo was getting through.

The AA guns stayed, and were placed on more ships as time went by and they became available.

Harold

The key to effective operations research is to figure out what the real criterion is. OR was invented, sort of, by Brit boffins looking at the Battle of the North Atlantic. It’s a classic story: the Royal Navy discovered that hasty attacks on submarines immediately after one was spotted didn’t get many submarines, so they devised new tactics to make attacks with precision and bring other escort craft to the location. The boffins analyzed the data and discovered that this was indeed true, but those tactics lost more ships than the hasty attacks – what was important was to break up the wolf pack and send the subs diving so the convoy could get past. Hasty attacks got ships through – and that was the real goal of the convoy.

Figuring out the true mission so that you don’t optimize on the wrong criterion is probably the most important job of an operations research team; and it’s astonishing how many operations commanders don’t know what the true strategic mission is.

clip_image002[4]

Jerry

He did it! A man flew with his arms and custom-built wings:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/human-bird-wings/

It will be a sport. Olympics, anyone?

Ed

– – –

Subject: fake? Re: I never thought I’d live to see the day of human powered flight

*sigh*

maybe fake.

http://gizmodo.com/5895235/cgi-experts-say-flying-bird-man-is-fake

– Paul

:wq!

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 14:34, Paul D. Walker wrote:

http://www.kurzweilai.net/houston-we-have-liftoff-humanbirdwings-guy-finally-enjoys-the-miracle-of-human-flight

– Paul

Just given the physics and biology I would say that it’s more than questionable: I’ll bet a dollar that it’s true but only if I’m given extreme odds. Say a million to one.

clip_image002[5]

‘Microsoft never seemed to recover from the shock of achieving their original 1975 goal.’

<http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/03/welcome-to-the-post-pc-era.html>

Roland Dobbins

I said that some years ago. But Microsoft has a lot of bright people, and its management may be able to give them more control while they try to find a new dream. Gates and Jobs had both genius and vision but in quite different ways. Jobs had to spend some years in the wilderness letting the technology catch up with his new visions; Gates stayed on his, and took a while recognizing the impact of the high speed internet even though he had written about it; but he always did have faith that the technology would bail him out if he went a bridge too far. Jobs went two bridges too far with the original Mac and it took a while before the technology let him build the machine he had envisioned.

clip_image004[2]

Combating climate change

Hello Jerry,

Dr. William Briggs (Statistician to the Stars: http://wmbriggs.com/) most recent blog entry is entitled ‘Bioengineering Humans To Combat Climate Change’. In it, he provides some excerpts from a ‘forthcoming peer reviewed “Human Engineering and Climate Change” in the journal ‘Ethics, Policy and the Environment’.

Your readers may be interested in his excerpts and his commentary thereon. Reading the actual journal requires a purchase. I, for one, don’t want to encourage public insanity, so I declined.

When reading Dr. Briggs’ piece, keep in mind that people who think like the authors of ‘Human Engineering and Climate Change’ are currently setting the policies, energy and otherwise, of the United States and much of the remainder of the formerly civilized world.

Bob Ludwick=

Humans have been reengineered to adapt to climate changes several times in our evolutionary history either through genuine climate change or because of migration, but we have let nature and nature’s God do that. I once had a job in a department of human engineering, and I did human engineering work, but we thought that mean engineering the device to be easier to use and more effective for humans.

We know pretty well how to survive warmer. We learned how to live at the edge of glaciers a long time ago.

clip_image002[6]

Energy and global warming

Jerry P:

I think I sent something along this line previously, but will do so again. The heat engine, the earth and atmosphere, converts thermal energy, solar flux, into mechanical energy. This moves the atmosphere and hydrosphere. I don’t have the desire to figure out the balance, but it is not an isentropic process and so there is loss of solar energy to movement of stuff; like air and water. Now someone could probably calculate how much energy it would take to move the Gulf Stream faster by say a mile per hour on the average. And it would be difficult to measure accurately. But it would be worth while to think about the claims that climatic warming will produce more and more severe weather patterns. So if that is true, then we want to know if there is a conversion increase and what balances it all out. I have not looked closely at this topic but have not found anything readily available to equate thermal/ mechanical conversion: solar flux vs ocean flux & atmospheric flux. Just pondering a bit.

CBS

The problem is that when you try to model these things you drown in complications, so you need to make a bunch of simplifying assumptions. In operations research we learned that the assumptions often govern the outcome, so we tried to build models in which the outcome was fairly insensitive to the assumptions. The climate modelers haven’t been able to do that. It’s still just too complicated; we don’t even have good agreements on measurement operations.

clip_image002[7]

Nation building

Hello Dr Pournelle, here are some of the reasons Afghanistan is different than Germany and Japan.

Both are homogeneous. Slice up Germany and Japan and you’ll find ethnically, culturally and even theologically homogenous populations.

The percentages who don’t fit the mainstream are small enough to be trivial. Iraq was three major groups, if you pick the three biggest groups in Afghanistan you can’t get to majority status. This means that since you have to do things different to deal with local conditions based on culture and other such factors, you essentially have to crack a new code for every little hamlet in Afghanistan.

Germany and Japan were logistically straightforward. While combat units move about relatively easily, the supplies you need for a population and an army are another matter. The sea gets you close to anywhere in Japan and the roads, rails and rivers allow you to move about in Germany without too much trouble. That sort of transportation network isn’t there in Afghanistan.

Germany and Japan were full of cosmopolitan, educated, motivated people who can and did take responsibility and control of local leadership and business. Afghanistan is dreadfully short of cosmopolitan, educated, motivated and not overwhelmingly corrupt people who can be trusted with important things like power over their neighbors, water or money.

Germany and Japan are culturally honest and hardworking. Afghanistan is culturally corrupt and lazy. I actually heard an uncorroborated story about a border policeman fired because he wasn’t taking in enough money in bribes, and passing a sufficient percentage along to his superiors.

There are others, but those are all huge problems for Afghanistan.

Serving Officer

The only thing that has ever united the people who live in the geographical area called Afghanistan is the presence of armed foreigners. That has been true since Alexander the Great. The Khan in Kabul never united the country for any length of time, and the President has even less power. The writ of Kabul does not run everywhere. Why we fight to subdue the Afghan people to the Mayor Kabul is not clear to me.

clip_image002[8]

nation building; what works, what doesn’t

Dr. Pournelle,

I had a thought that not every nation building effort of the U.S. has been an unmitigated disaster, and I wondered what did we do different in Germany and Japan? The answer was not a big surprise. In Japan, Gen. MacArthur did 1) defeat the enemy utterly and completely. 2) Break up the existing Oligarchies and (I hate to say it) redistribute the wealth. 3) Rule as absolute dictator for several years while building a new, western style government. 4) Dictate a new, western style, Constitution. Simple. As speaker Gingrich is fond of saying; "Simple doesn’t mean easy".

By contrast, in Iraq, the U.S. military ruled for about 30 days. Then the state department took over, putting the worst proconsul in the history of the world (Paul Bremer) in charge. I don’t know what criteria he used in employing and installing a new civilian government, but he did it quite quickly, and left everything else up to them. This resulted in the same power structures, same ownership of wealth, etc. And of course the new bosses wrote a constitution to benefit themselves and no one else. Even your youngest readers (any idea what that age might be?) can see how well that has worked.

It strikes me as reasonable to assume that Japanese peasants started from the same point of ignorance of republican style government as Iraqi peasants. The results are so dramatically different because the methods were dramatically different, or so I see it.

Martin Lee Rose

Pueblo, Colorado

So far as I know we never had any clear goals in either Afghanistan or Iraq. I opposed going into Iraq at all, and advocated driving out the Taliban and getting out quickly in Afghanistan, leaving behind the impression that it would be a good thing not to annoy the United States – while we invested the money we weren’t spending on wars in building energy independence. I was told the Iraq war would only cost $300 Billion, but I never got a very detailed account of how that number was arrived at. For what we have spent in the years since 2002 we could have energy independence and a new Fleet.

Afghanistan makes nothing we want. Iraq has oil but we don’t get any. As an old operations research man I was trained to identify the goals and criteria. I am not sure that was done for either of those operations. We knew what we wanted from our occupations in Germany and Japan.

clip_image002[9]

Regarding Fluke

I don’t think you need to suppose that government subsidies for birth control will inevitably follow the HHS mandate. I think there’s another way to demolish the Fluke argument:

First of all, mandates have ALWAYS increased health insurance costs. The size of the uptick varies, of course, but there has never been a mandate that has NOT increased monthly premiums. And who pays those higher premiums, pray tell? Employers. People who buy their own health insurance plans (like yours truly). In short, a lot of people who are NOT Ms. Fluke. So yes — our thirty-year-old Georgetown coed IS asking other people to pay for her birth control.

Further, once ALL contraception is declared "free," do you think people will continue to buy the generics? Of course not. They’re going to go after the pricier brands. Big Pharma will certainly make a killing — especially after those companies start jacking up their prices in response to the utter lack of cost-reducing incentives. And what’s going to happen once the insurance industry is hit with larger bills for their government-mandated birth control coverage? Insurance companies will charge higher premiums. So once again, employers and individual health care consumers will end up footing the bill.

Personally, I don’t think it’s just to ask me to pay more for my health insurance so the CEO of Pfizer can swim in a pile of money. Do you?

Stephanie S.

Well said.

clip_image004[3]

clip_image006

clip_image004[4]

Old Stuff, psychiatry, and a trip to the emergency room

View 717 Thursday, March 22, 2012

Eric was over all day as we Threw Stuff Away, coming down to the layer that accumulated when I was getting my brain burned out with hard X-rays, and all kinds of review stuff accumulated and piled up unopened. Some of it did get reviewed, and some just vanished into the muck, and it was pretty well a Shroedinger’s Cat situation as to which was which. We also discovered some truly historic stuff. There’s the ViewSonic 1024 x 768 flat screen monitor which in its day was the best thing since sliced bread, all boxed up in its original box with nylon thread reinforcing tape in strategic places, and all the original packing plastic mould beds. Niven and I carried that on road trips with the best portable computer we had, a good keyboard, and a good mouse; we’d set it up in a motel, such as the one in Death Valley, and write scenes from our next novel on it. As Eric observed when I asked what ought to replace it, now we just use large screen laptops; but in those days there weren’t any.

We found Ethernet Hubs (not switches); Software from the ages; all kinds of good stuff.

clip_image002

The Secret of Black Ship Island is posted. I yesterday called it the Legend of Black Ship Island. It’s one of those tricky memory things that keeps happening to me now. Nothing really serious, and I catch on fast. It is comforting that my memory today is about the same as Niven’s was when I met him forty years ago.

I’m feeling a lot better and my energy levels go up every day. Getting up the hill yesterday (4.5 miles round trip and 700 foot climb) was an accomplishment but it felt good. And my friend who has brought his severely autistic boy from a professional diagnosis of hopelessly retarded to A’s and B’s and clearly a high understanding of things he is interested in such as Medieval History – and also a polite potential citizen – is writing the case history up, which is terribly important.

I owe you a good essay on the state of psychiatric/psychological theory as it has developed over the years, and why things are in such a sorry state now.

When I was in graduate school in psychology, ADD and ADHD barely existed. The word ‘autistic’ ==

0330 AM

At this point I was called to assist Roberta who had a household accident that looked serious enough that I immediately drove her to the Kaiser Emergency Room. All’s well, we are back home with medications and a big bandage and some follow-ups to do, but I’ll have to do my essay on what has happened to psychiatry since I was in graduate school another time. It’s important. The teaser is that we have far too much theory and far too little data, and my friend’s case history of his son, and the stories of what happened to others he has met – people with severely autistic children tend to meet a lot of others with the same problem – is important.

It started in Vienna not so many years ago

When not enough people were getting sick,

And a starving young physician sought to better his condition

By figuring out what made his patients tick.

That’s the opening of a humorous folk song, but it contains a great deal of truth. Freud, on the basis of some real and some made up cases switched psychiatry from being a branch of medicine to something else, and postulated some physiological structures for which there was absolutely no evidence, nor is there any now. There’s actually more evidence for Hubbard’s theory of the ‘reactive’ mind as opposed to intellectual consciousness, which was the central theory of Dianetics before the AMA forced him to turn it from a science – he thought of himself as a scientist – to a religion. Yet Freud was and for the most part remains intellectually respectable. And psychiatry for a while divorced itself from the standard practice of medicine which collects case histories and looks for groupings of people who respond to certain treatments, and who use raw data – case histories – and have definite criteria for declaring when they know the ‘cause’ of a condition. Psychiatric textbooks of the 1950’s were way different from what you find now – and were also quite different in structure and argument from medical textbooks in other medical specialties.

But it’s late, and I have to get to bed.

clip_image002

I want again to say nice things about Kaiser. Everyone we encountered out there was cheerful, cooperative, and thoroughly professional. That includes the triage nurse who has one of the toughest jobs anywhere, the orderlies, and the checkout nurse, as well as the doctors and nurses in the ER itself.

clip_image002[1]

While we were out at the ER I read an article I probably wouldn’t have read. Andrei Navrozov, Baudelaire in Russia in the current issue of Chronicles (a paleo-conservative magazine). I have searched for something to link to, but I can’t find it; the article is in the April 2012 issue. Navrozov is the poetry editor, and his point is that there was probably more communication among and within the literary community in the 19th Century than today. “It turns out that news of high culture travelled much faster before the invention of the telephone and the computer.” He gives a number of instances. The article is not one I would normally have read, but it was what I had when waiting, and I got more to think about from it than from anything else I have recently read. More on that another time, but the entire April issue of Chronicles is filled with good stuff including a short disquisition on Green Pastures, the Broadway play made from Roark Bradford’s Ol’ Man Adam and His Chillun, a book I encountered in high school and remember to this day. I don’t care for much that I find in Chronicles, but sometimes it’s right on the button. As for instance “When Judicial Supremacists Artrack” by William J. Watkins, Jr., an excellent discussion of constitutional law and judicial supremacy, and perhaps a better exposition of what Newt Gingrich was trying to get at than Newt himself made, also in the April issue.

Note that I had misspelled Navrozov in my first uploading of this. That will teach me to write anything serious at 3:30 AM/

clip_image003

And now I really have to get to bed. It’s 0400. Good night.

clip_image002[2]

clip_image002[11]

clip_image002[12]

clip_image005

clip_image002[13]