Equality, Battlefield Earth, Diversity, Aether, Harrison Bergeron, and other matters

Mail 721 Saturday, April 21, 2012

clip_image002

Equality

"that all men are created equal": the Great Lie in the US Declaration of Independence. The Great Lie, because it is patently and obviously untrue.

Some people simply are superior to others. Was the opinion of Albert Einstein (who, I believe, became a US citizen) of equal value to Joe Epsilon Minus?

Ian Campbell

But of course. Do you really think that Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, were unaware that in the real world men are not equal, either in potential or in realization of their talents, or in moral worth? Do you believe an experienced soldier doesn’t know very well that his troopers are not equal? Yet we made that an axiom of the Republic.

An axiom. Which is to say, we agreed not to question that as a principle. All are equal before the law, as opposed to England where some could be tried only by their peers, or in Visigothic Spain where there were categories of citizenship, or in Rome where there were Patricians and Plebians, or – well, I needn’t belabor the point. For good or ill, we contracted to the notion that people are equal. But that works both ways, or should.

What we have done is take a self-evidently limited axiom and tried to stretch it beyond all limits, then pretend that everyone really and truly is equal, and there must be equality of outcome as well as of opportunity.

Now as a matter of theology, all men as seen by God may very well be of equal worth; and we wrote that into the Declaration also. We postulated that there is a morality external to our wishes, and we agreed to act as if we believe that to be true.

As to the value of citizens, that is a much different question. What does it mean, value? And to whom? In some cultures the legitimate children of some fathers are definitely worth more than their illegitimate children who are in turn worth more than the children legitimate or not of less favored fathers. That we rejected.

No, all are not equal, and some are more valuable to the Republic than others, and we have always had the good sense to act that way; but we have also had the good sense not to dig too deeply into what we mean by equality and worth.

When I was young I thought and said that I thought that the law should be colorblind. This wasn’t a popular view among the adults around me in legally segregated Memphis, and I was thought a hopeless left-winger (at a time when I had no understanding of what that meant). As I grew older I never changed that view, and now I am thought a hopeless right-winger, although I am not sure what that means either. I once told one of my pre-law students who had been admitted to UCLA Law School under a minorities program to go back and tell them to stuff it: I wouldn’t have recommended him if I didn’t think he deserved acceptance, not as a black man, but as a hard working student who applied himself and would do well in law school. I never expected him to be in the top half of his class, but then not everyone will be. But he deserved to be accepted on his merits, not on the merit of being black.

And that is what I mean by equality.

Aristotle teaches us that injustice consists of treating equal thing unequally, but also of treating unequal things equally. We need to be careful what we mean by “created equal”, and we certainly cannot separate created equal from a Creator; but we long ago agreed to that, as we agreed that just powers of government come from the consent of the governed.

clip_image002[1]

Diversity and the melting pot.

Jerry,

I believe that at one time before one could become a naturalised American it was necessary to have some grasp of the English language. Dropping this rule was very unwise. My job seeking Californian friend tells me that being bilingual in English and Spanish is now required by most employers. For a country to establish enclaves of people who do not speak the language of the country is very divisive.

As to Fred Reed on the black population, I expect that you are both correct. I surmise that the blacks that you meet are, pigmentation aside, no different from the whites that you meet. Fred spent a lot of time as a crime reporter riding in the police cars that patrolled the ghettos, and saw the worst side of the black population. Given inspired teaching some ghetto children can reach the middle classes but they, and the teaching that they need are in short supply. Read Fred’s cop columns if you are skeptical.

Then there is the great evil of positive discrimination. A black who has the talent and determination to rise in his profession will encounter quite reasonable doubts as to whether he rose because of his innate qualities or because, being short of the black quota, he was selected because he was the best black available.

John Edwards

RE: Diversity vs. the Melting Pot

Thank you thank you thank you! Why? For actually articulating the real problem that the Pollyanish left and ‘Derbyshire’ right refuse to concede: that the disintegration of the culture is the real problem, and not cognitive gaps, racism, etc.

As near as I can tell, blacks were doing just fine at assimilating into the middle class right up until LBJ and the Great Society basically blew that apart and set blacks (and America) back decades.

That this is very rarely mentioned is both galling and frustrating, and I thank you furiously for being one of the (very) few commentators actually pointing it out. If only you could get everyone else singing from the same hymnal, we might be able to have a sane, reasonable, discussion that we *need* to have.

Thanks again,

ECM

 

The evidence from the academies in New York and other places is that there are plenty of blacks willing and able to be assimilated into the Republic, and that this is desirable. The rejection of assimilation is a terrible tragedy. When the American culture is gone then e pluribus unum will be gone as well.

Excellent essay today.

It included this: " Yet there’s hope: there are the projects in Harlem, and Chicago, which insist on excellence in education, and which succeed, often startlingly well. You don’t see much about them in the media. Once in a while 60 Minutes will focus on such an institution, but mostly they don’t, and there’s a reason. They emphasize discipline, good grooming, politeness, and cultural assimilation along with rigorous education. And they work. They are turning out Americans who are black. And thus they are all but ignored by the liberal intellectuals."

I have seen reports on these projects and agree that they are conspicuous by their undeniable success, by general lack of widespread reporting on them in the media, and a visceral hatred shown them by the ‘education establishment’. On the other hand, the hundred odd years of empirical data that Fred refers to is still empirical data.

Unfortunately, I suspect that by demonstrating that dedicated, skilled instructors who insist on excellence and enforce classroom discipline can move the bell curve of black achievement one SD to the right, what is really demonstrated is that dedicated, skilled instructors who insist on excellence and enforce classroom discipline can take a population whose IQ bell curve peaks at 85 and instill in it what is considered to be an excellent education by our educational establishment. I also suspect, but with no supporting data other than the hundred years of data cited by Fred, that if caucasian students were ‘subjected’ to the same ‘enforce discipline and push the students to the limit’ educational environment, rather than being immersed in a culture of ‘no child left behind’ that their ‘results’ bell curve would move one SD to the right of the the black results bell curve. And if a group of Ashkenazic Jews were similarly subjected, their results bell curve would in turn peak approximately one SD to the right of the general caucasian peak. Just as a century of empirical data has consistently indicated.

Bob Ludwick

You miss the point. So what? The nation does not require that everyone be above average. It does require a certain minimum of acculturation. The academic results show that those willing to become Americans can do so. That may not be all of the young blacks. I wouldn’t know. I do know that it has been adequately demonstrated that significant numbers of young blacks respond to hard work and discipline despite some wide spread assumptions that this can’t happen.

We need as many Americans as we can get. We do not need diversity.

clip_image002[2]

The High Ground

Dear Jerry;

Last week this outcropped on Chaos Manor:

"Himalayan glaciers actually GAINING ice, space scans show:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/16/himalayan_karakoram_glaciers_gaining_ice/

An inconvenient truth?

Ed

Which is hardly astonishing since glacier formation is far more dependent on rainfall and moisture content than temperature. Actually, warmer climates ought to be wetter, shouldn’t they? Which would mean more snowfall and glaciers which should mean more reflectivity which should mean cooling which – but I am not a climate modeller. I would have thought that kind of loop would be built into the models, though."

Your comments are apposite, but having ranged several of the glaciers in question, especially the Raikot, I feel obliged to point out the obvious- With major peaks above 25,000 feet, the monsoon fed glaciers between Nanga Parbat , K2 and Kargil are so high as to defy vertical migration of the frost line – global warming is not about to thaw the Death Zone anytime soon.

Incidentally , the scariest bergschund tongue on Nanga Parbat has a bridge over it, and consists , in season, of a clanking down escalator made up of house sized rocks barely lubricated with ice. You <i> really<.I>don’t want to go down there!

Russell Seitz

Fellow of the Department of Physics

Harvard University

clip_image002[3]

Fabrication of a witness in the Zimmerman-Martin shooting.

Jerry;

There is some really good web sleuthing occurring on this case.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/04/21/update-10-part-2-the-trayvon-martin-shooting-deedee-reveals-the-false-truths/#more-37932

I expect Zimmerman to be suing the Martin family lawyers under state and federal RICO statutes.

Jim Crawford

clip_image002[4]

IOM Report on Autism & Childhood Vaccination

http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality/Report-Brief.aspx?page=2=

Autism & Childhood Vaccines

Hi Jerry-

Fifteen years ago, when my children were in the vaccination cohort, I carefully reviewed the evidence regarding autism and exposure to childhood vaccines. At that time, there was rather convincing evidence that exposure to vaccines did not increase the risk of autism. Since that time, additional evidence has accumulated that there is no relationship between vaccine exposure and autism. I am unaware of any credible evidence to the contrary. If there is evidence that now shows that vaccine exposure has the effect of increasing autism risk, I’d be greatly interested in looking at it.

Best,

-Steve=

I do not believe it is a good idea to give 25 vaccinations all at once, as they used to do. There needs to be some sanity in this business.

clip_image003

I have a great deal of mail on this.

Gold Record on Pioneers

“It occurred to me I have never read any novels about a race that discovers one of our probes which exited the solar system, then did a search to find us based upon the gold record.

Do you know of any (and I mean good ones, not a hack novel).

I recall the First Star Treck Film, but that does not count…

B”

L Ron Hubbard’s book Battlefield Earth has the planet attacked based on the Gold Records of the Pioneers.

Whether or not it’s a hack novel is not for me to say.

David March

Many others have pointed this out. Hubbard wrote science fiction adventure (indeed adventure of every conceivable genre – he was incredibly prolific) and much of it remains quite readable. The reputation of Battlefield Earth was not enhanced by the motion picture, which had a director afraid of his star, and who allowed the star to overact as many actors will do if the director will let them; the result was the injection of farcical scenes in a dramatic movie, and that never works. I thought the novel a bit long, but it certainly moved. Hubbard was a story teller.

Gold from Voyager

" It occurred to me I have never read any novels about a race that discovers one of our probes which exited the solar system, then did a search to find us based upon the gold record."

Well, there’s Battlefield Earth. Although it turned out that the gold was what they wanted all along, and if we’d done it on titanium or steel then they wouldn’t have bothered.

Mike T. Powers

clip_image002[5]

» Climate Alarmist Calls For Burning Down Skeptics’ Homes Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

Jerry,

Fallen Angels should become required reading.

http://www.infowars.com/climate-alarmist-calls-for-burning-down-skeptics-homes/

Jim Crawford

I wouldn’t mind that.

clip_image002[6]

Pioneer anomaly solved?

<http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00003459/>

<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2507v1.pdf>

Roland Dobbins

That may well be. I have always hoped that the Pioneer anomaly would provide us with an interesting test of special relativity. As they get farther and farther from the Sun the gravitational field gets thinner; under Beckmann’s theory the speed of light changes as the medium changes, and the medium is the dominant gravitational field through which the light ray travels.

Beckmann has tried to revive the notion of an aether: it consists of the gravitational field, and it’s in that field that light waves ‘wave’. As the medium changes the speed of light changes (as it does when it goes into water or a glass prism). The gravitational field of the Earth is entrained (moves with the Earth) so the Michaelson-Morley experiment would not be expected to find any proper motion of the Earth through the aether. But that’s another essay for another time.

clip_image003[1]

Harrison Bergeron-short film

I didn’t know if you were aware that someone had done an excellent short film adaptation on this story. You can watch it on youtube at the following link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7mftzcZfJ0

Craig Pruett

I had never seen that. Thanks.

clip_image002[7]

Fred’s variation on HARRISON BERGERON

http://www.fredoneverything.net/LLA.shtml

This was posted last November but seems to fit.

Charles Brumbelow

clip_image002[8]

HARRISON BERGERON – A Secondary Story

(Re)read this story and picked up a secondary story line.

"It was then that Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, came into the studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She fired twice, and the Emperor and the Empress were dead before they hit the floor."

Notice that the HG showed up quickly, and efficiently murdered the two dancers, without any hint of having been handicapped down to average…demonstrating once again that government functionaries are not subject to their own laws, rules, and regulations, and that subjects are not provided with due process One can reasonably infer that murder charges would not be filed against the HG.

Today a drone strike would probably be used…

Charles Brumbelow

clip_image002[9]

Stand Your Ground law – part 2

Dear Jerry,

After Matthew wrote and quoted the statute, I did some research. The information I gave was based on the Diane Rehm Show, air date 3 April. The transcript can be found at http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2012-04-03/stand-your-ground-and-concealed-weapons-laws/transcript. The background on the reason for the law is given by John Velleco of Gun Owners of America :

MR. JOHN VELLECO

10:08:38

Well, Stand Your Ground laws were needed because people were being prosecuted for defending themselves with a firearm because of the principal of the duty to retreat, and people have — would have a duty to retreat in the face of attack and…

GJELTEN

10:08:57

Is that phrase duty to retreat actually written into law in many places?

VELLECO

10:09:02

Yes. That was written into several Supreme Court cases going back to the late 1800s. And it becomes a murky proposition when — did a person retreat enough? And people were being prosecuted and bankrupt defending themselves. Even if they were not convicted, they would end up being bankrupt by overzealous prosecutions and finding themselves victimized really twice, once by the criminal, once by the criminal justice system.

The statements on police limitations, by Elizabeth Megale of Barry University Law School, are as follows:

MEGALE

10:14:43

Prosecution begins with detention in Florida. Most other states don’t start prosecution with detention. But in the statute defining immunity from prosecution, we start the definition at detention, then custody, then arrest, which means someone cannot even be detained if there’s any evidence that they acted in self-defense. In the castle, again, you have this presumption of reasonable fear.

MEGALE

10:15:07

But even outside the castle, if there’s any evidence that shows that you had a reasonable fear, then you no longer have to establish that to a jury or even to a judge. The police are not entitled or allowed to arrest you until they can disprove this — that you were not in reasonable fear or — excuse me — until they can prove you were not in reasonable fear.

MEGALE

10:15:32

So that’s the problem with this — with the Trayvon Martin case, is that when the police arrived on scene, at least one version of the story is that Mr. Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his claims that he was acting in self-defense. And if that is the case and there was any evidence of that, the police are now in a position where they must disprove his claim of self-defense before they can even detain him.

So Matthew is, of course, correct, and I should have done more research before I wrote to you. Police were required to release Zimmerman, but not to cease investigating the incident. My apologies.

Regards,

Jim (still not related to Trayvon) Martin

clip_image002[10]

Terry Pratchett-This is just sad

In today’s Britain, even a Knight must hide his sword.

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/blogs/sir-terry-pratchett-forges-a-sword-with-a-meteorite

Will there ever again be an England?

Cordially,

John

I guess there will never again be an England, and that is indeed sad.

clip_image002[11]

Dear Dr. Pournelle:

I just now came across this:

http://io9.com/5903345/is-james-camerons-next-big-venture-asteroid+mining

and thought it would interest you. I’ve been waiting for this to happen ever since I read your first stories about it. Cameron may be a flake but Diamandis and the others seem like serious guys.

Regards,

Tim Scott=

We can hope.

.

clip_image003[2]

Jerry,

This Henninger piece on Paul Ryan hits the nail straight on the head. I have been looking for someone to articulate my thoughts on this and it was a Pope from long ago.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304356604577337922580242292.html?KEYWORDS=paul+ryan

Ryan is on it…

rjw

Rod

clip_image002[12]

‘Instead, they identify local businesses, like bagel shops and delis, that are not in compliance with the law, and then aggressively recruit plaintiffs from advocacy groups for people with disabilities.’

<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/nyregion/lawyers-find-obstacles-to-the-disabled-then-find-plaintiffs.html?&pagewanted=all>

Roland Dobbins

The Iron Law at work.

clip_image002[13]

clip_image002[14]

clip_image005

clip_image002[15]

Diversity vs. the Melting Pot

View 720 Friday, April 20, 2012

clip_image002

Many of you have called my attention to three comments by Fred Reed (Fred on Everything). They are all on the same topic although approaching it from different directions, but all starting with a the Zimmerman Martin affair. They are in order, and it won’t take long to read them all.

http://fredoneverything.net/Screwed.shtml

http://fredoneverything.net/Travon2.shtml

http://fredoneverything.net/Zimmerman.shtml

The third comment begins

The Coming Race War in America was published in 1996 by Carl Rowan, the black columnist and former ambassador to Finland. The title is not ironic. He foresaw a major racial explosion. The book of course was furiously ignored. It should not have been. It dealt with an apocalyptic vision that has lurked around the edges of American consciousness since before the Civil War. And still does. We just don’t talk about it.”

Fred writes in the tradition of the science fiction authors in stories characterized by Robert Heinlein as “Warning: If this goes on…” and of course one of his novellas, about what happens if Evangelicals like the Reverend Billy Sunday take political power, had that title. Fred isn’t writing about the dangers of evangelicals.

Fred is an old friend, and I often agree with him. I’d like to say I don’t agree this time, but when I say that I have to add a qualification. He’s certainly right: if this goes on, if things continue without any change, there isn’t much hope. Fred says:

This: Our racial policy has proved a disaster. Sixty years after Brown vs. the School Board, blacks have not assimilated. They constitute a separate people having almost nothing in common with the surrounding European society. They fiercely maintain their identity with their own music, dialect, customs, dress, and names. All attempts to turn them into middle-class whites in darker packaging have failed. Only relentless governmental pressure forces an appearance of partial integration.

Let’s consider a few awkward facts that loom ghoulishly above the body politic, which seems to be decomposing. First, on every known measure of cognitive ability, on IQ, SATs, GREs, everything, blacks average about one standard deviation, fifteen IQ points, below whites. The gap is a fact. It exists. It is reflected in performance. It has proved intractable. In a technological civilization that rewards intelligence, the deficit sharply limits legitimate access to the higher reaches of money, power, class, and prestige.

Second, blacks continue to show little interest in schooling. Exceptions and degrees, yes. Yet consider cities such as Washington, which usually has a black mayor, black city council, mostly black school board, black staffs in the schools, black parents, black students, a high per-capita expenditure—and perhaps the worst schools in the country. This is a fact, and shows no signs of diminishing. It is repeated in countless cities.

And, alas, it’s all true. Yet there’s hope: there are the projects in Harlem, and Chicago, which insist on excellence in education, and which succeed, often startlingly well. You don’t see much about them in the media. Once in a while 60 Minutes will focus on such an institution, but mostly they don’t, and there’s a reason. They emphasize discipline, good grooming, politeness, and cultural assimilation along with rigorous education. And they work. They are turning out Americans who are black. And thus they are all but ignored by the liberal intellectuals.

American liberals have decided to give up the Melting Pot, and Assimilation, for something called ‘diversity’; and that is fatal to a Republic like ours. As Bill Buckley used to be fond of pointing out, America was different: anyone could learn how to be an American. You could study it in books, or observe how your neighbors did things, and it worked. You can’t study to become a Swiss, or a Frenchman, or an Englishman. You can’t learn how to be a Swede. German Jews used to be divided over whether the question of assimilation, and there were heated intellectual discussions between Zionists and Assimilationists in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. And you may recall the answer of the German middle class leader to the question of why Frau Schultz should not associate with Herr Schneider. “He is not a German.” (My reference, of course, is to ‘Cabaret’ which was based on Christopher Isherwood’s I Am A Camera, drawn from life observations in the decadent Berlin last days of the Weimar Republic. I saw and was impressed by both the staged musical and the movie, but the stage version was far better and much closer to the realities captured in the fiction.)

It used to be that America had a culture, and we regarded it as superior to any other – or, sometimes, more modestly, we insisted that whether or not it was better – there were many in academia who rated various European intellectual societies far above the American – it was ours, and it was what we had, and you were welcome to become part of it. The Melting Pot worked. Irish, Hungarian, Polish, Slavic, Italian, Sicilian, Lithuanian, Lebanese, Irish again, Italian again, and throughout the 19th Century Jews from many places came in waves to the United States, were looked down on, sometimes exploited, but over time admitted to the American culture, and over generations became powerful bearers, defenders, and transmitters of that culture. There were variants of the American culture – that’s what States are for, and that’s what freedom is for – but there were also basic axioms. One set of axioms was the set stated as ‘self evident’ in the Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That phrase was carefully drawn. What it meant when said, and what it means now, is that we are not going to question certain axioms: that there is a Creator, and that Creator endowed all our citizens with inalienable rights – but neither ‘happiness’ nor ‘property’ is among them. The original source was John Locke who proclaimed rights to life, liberty, and property. All the Framers endorsed that, in the sense that securing property rights was the whole point of the Rebellion, Revolution, Confederation, and finally the Constitution of 1789; but there was considerable disagreement over what the right to property meant. Does it mean that everyone ought to have some? Well, yes – but how should he acquire it? Not by taking it from someone else. Not by having the government take it from someone else. But he surely had the right to acquire it, and the right to have his possession defended by government. That was the next axiom:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

And that, too, was accepted by the Convention of 1787, whose task was to draft a document that would create the mechanisms by which the consent of the governed might be ascertained.

And all that was assumed as part of the American culture. Americans were assumed to believe that the Constitution derived its just powers from the consent of the governed. Note that there was never any question about the existence of government power. Everyone knew what that was. Power was force, forcing people to do things they had no consented to. The Constitution said, well, yes, you have consented to certain things even if you, personally, don’t much care for them. And here they are, as far as the power of the Federal government goes. And yes, you will obey, as the followers of the Whiskey Rebellion found when President Washington led troops to suppress them. The rebels, some of them veterans of Washington’s revolutionary army, dispersed rather than face overwhelming force led by the legendary Washington, and rally nothing much came of it; but the principle was established.

And over time an American culture was built, and over time the conditions for admission to it were defined. It wasn’t perfect, and it took generations for some ethnic groups to be so assimilated that no one remembered when they hadn’t been, and the only “diversity” happened on St. Patrick’s Day or Columbus Day (or festivals in honor of Kościuszko, or Greek Independence). For a while it appeared the Cinco de Mayo might join St Patrick’s day as a celebration of Americans of Mexican descent, rather than a rally of La Raza.

The assimilation of Blacks had a different history, but even in the legally segregated South it was happening. A series of civil rights acts were intended to enable black assimilation.

Now that is all challenged. Assimilation is no longer the goal. Now it is ‘diversity’. In rejecting American exceptionalism in favor of ‘diversity’ we have sown the wind. We now reap the whirlwind.

I differ from Fred in that I think it is not impossible that we turn back and forsake our foolish ways. I also fear that we will not. I do not think that America can survive diversity. Few Republics ever have. The United States was able to tolerate a great number of cultural differences – even to rejoice and enjoy them—but that was all predicated on the overall premise of American exceptionalism, that we could all sing America the Beautiful and God Bless America, and anyone who wouldn’t was a foreigner.

clip_image002[1]

I continue to catch up. All is returning to normal at Chaos Manor. Next I have to get to the Apple store to update my iPhone and iPad, and there’s a bunch of stuff like that (including getting Sable washed and groomed) but I should have some time at my desk now. It has been a hectic first quarter.

clip_image002[2]

Thanks to those who called my attention to this:

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/blogs/sir-terry-pratchett-forges-a-sword-with-a-meteorite 

Sir Terry Pratchett forged his own sword base and had it created by an artist – and now hides it from the authorities who apparently don’t allow British landholders to have a sword in the house? Not only will there not always be an England, apparently there’s no longer an England. But they are further down the road to diversity than we are.

clip_image003[5]

I had not read the morning paper when I wrote the above, but in today’s Wall Street Journal is an editorial page essay “The Ugly Brutishness of Modern Britain” which tells more about the joys of diversity. It gives a number of examples of the utter collapse of civility and decent order in today’s diversified Britain, and ends

 

<clip>Multiculturalism is damaging because it denies that, when it comes to culture, there is a better and a worse, a higher and a lower—only difference. The word culture is used here in its anthropological sense, that is to mean the totality of behavior that is not directly biological.

Hence any conduct—lying scantily clad in a pool of vomit, for example—is part of a culture, and since all cultures, ex hypothesi, are of equal worth, no one has the moral right to criticize, much less forbid, any kind of behavior. And if I have to accept your culture, you have to accept mine. If you don’t like it—tough. Unfortunately, the lowest level of culture is the easiest to reach and, again ex hypothesi, there is no reason to aim higher.

Incivility in Britain thus has a militant or ideological edge to it. The uncivil British are not uncivilized by default—they actively hate and repudiate civilization.<clip>

We have not yet got there in these United States, but if we do not turn back from liberalism and restore the notion of a free republic as culturally superior to – or at least more desirable than – “diversity”, we are doomed.

clip_image003[5]

Then we have:

University echo chamber drowns out diverse voices

Debra J. Saunders

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scMGSQ1R

 

The report cites a number of studies that document academia’s political imbalance. In 2004, for example, researchers examined the voter registration of UC Berkeley faculty. They found a ratio of 8 Democrats for each Republican. While the ratio was 4:1 in the professional schools, in more political disciplines, the ratio rose to 17:1 in the humanities and 21:1 in social sciences.

Over the last few decades, the imbalance has grown.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scMd4HEG

Campus reading lists require trendy books instead of challenging authors, like Shakespeare, who can draw students deeper into the English language. Teach-ins are notoriously one-sided. College graduates today are less proficient as readers than past graduates. The National Center for Education Statistics found that only 31 percent of college graduates could read and explain a complex book. In 1961, students spent an average of 24 hours per week on homework; today’s students study for 14 hours per week.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scN2ERBz

And of course tuition rises, credentialism flourishes, and the beat goes on. Diversity pays if you’re in the business of forcing it down people’s throats.

clip_image003[5]

I note that the above is incomplete in one respect. It looks as if to be an American you have to believe in a Creator. After all, we put that at the heart of the Declaration, Lincoln used it in his justifications of his acts, and until recently every politician acted as if he believed it.

All true. But “acted as if he believed it” applied quite well to many of the Framers, who understood perfectly well that freedom of religion is not the same thing as having no religion. Many of the Framers – Franklin, Jefferson – had their doubts about the existence of a Creator and pretty well rejected the creeds of most of the large organized religions. Deism – a creator who built the Universe, but then took little notice of it afterwards, was popular among the intelligentsia of that time, and that included a number of the Framers. But what they insisted on was the acceptance of a moral code that wasn’t just the product of a legislature or a group of thinkers: it was something to be universally accepted, and we would operate within it. There might be doubts at the edges of it, but of one thing there was no doubt at all” right and wrong existed independent of the will of Congress. We will all agree to certain principles which seem pretty universal, in our dealings with each other. And yes, it is not a perfect union. We have deliberately overlooked slavery which many of those signing detested and many more disapproved of on moral grounds. Washington thought his duty to his family precluded emancipating his slaves while he was alive, but did so in his will, and Jefferson wished he had been a more prudent manager so that he could do the same.

But the existence of an exception to the agreed consensus on the scope of a general moral code only emphasizes more strongly the need for a moral code that pre-exists government and which pervades the society. Respect for some form or equality, and for life, liberty and property, is central to the endurance of self government. Once we reject that, once everything is up for grabs, when every culture is equal to every other, then of course the culture which says “I rule because I can” becomes as valid as one that says I rule because the governed consented to my rule. It becomes increasingly harder to object to the rule of Mubarak, Amin Dada

 

clip_image003[5]

 

RIP

Natasha Harris, 30. New Zealand wife and Mom. Died in February 2010, but cause
of death just now revealed: a heart attack brought on by critically low potassium
levels. Drank 8 to 10 Liters of Coca-Cola a day, waking up with it in the morning
and going to bed with it at night. Apparently ingested little else.

No Comment

clip_image003[5]

clip_image003[5]

clip_image003[5]

clip_image005

clip_image003[6]

Great Pix, Old Weather, Young mensans, and other matters

Mail 721 Thursday, April 19, 2012

clip_image002

If you have not seen this, it’s beautiful.

Spectacular solar eruption caught by NASA cameras

Wow!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2130954/Spectacular-solar-eruption-caught-Nasa-cameras.html

Wow indeed

clip_image002[1]

Amazon updated books

Jerry

My understanding and experience with updated ebooks from Amazon is that you need to contact customer support to get the new version. I have received email from Amazon telling me that a new version was available. Amazon has stated that this is necessary because loading the new edition causes notes and highlighting to be lost.

Randy

Randy Cox

Thanks

clip_image002[2]

Stand Your Ground law and the Zimmerman case

One of your earlier readers wrote (and you quoted):

"Apparently, the Florida law was written not just to protect against conviction for not running away from a threat, but to protect against the damage an unsuccessful prosecution can cause to those of us who are not wealthy. According to the broadcast, a determination of threat by responding LEOs prevents any further action on the subject. Under the law, the police were actually prohibited from further investigation once they concluded (rightly or wrongly) that Zimmerman reasonably felt threatened."

This is not correct, and it is in fact *specifically* contradicted by a plain language reading of the stand your ground law.

The law prohibits arresting or charging the victim in a self-defense case without probable cause that a crime was committed by the victim. The police are specifically allowed to complete a normal investigation to determine if the use of deadly force in self-defense was justified, they just can’t arrest the victim until they have probable cause.

The relevant statute is Fla. Stat. Section 776.032 (2005):

——

(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.

(2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.

——

Clearly, section 2 authorizes the use of standard procedures for an investigation. They just can’t arrest, detain, charge, or prosecute until they develop probable cause from their investigation. This is a separate issue from whether a standard investigation was actually conducted in any specific case, of course; the point is, the law specifically authorizes investigation rather than prohibiting it. Arguably, specifying "standard procedures" means that you can’t suddenly intensify an investigation when your town is invaded by protestors… but I think I would consider that a feature, not a bug.

Matthew

I don’t profess to know. I presume much will come out at trial. I have yet to hear from a lawyer any praise for the prosecutor’s deposition.

clip_image002[3]

If one of their executives is named "Lori Jo Hansen…."

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/18/2957585/planetary-resources-space-exploration-company-james-cameron-google

They should at least give you a courtesy ride into orbit.

Heh. Thanks.

clip_image002[4]

The Geostrategic Return of the Philippines

By Jim Thomas and Harry Foster

As the Obama administration executes its strategic “pivot” to the Western Pacific in the face of China’s military buildup, it is rediscovering the importance of a long-standing ally in the region. Like Gibraltar half a world away, the Philippines lie at a vital maritime crossroads through which passes more than half of the world’s shipping tonnage and 80 percent of crude oil shipments headed to Japan and South Korea.

The strategic importance of this archipelago nation is enduring. Over a century ago, the famed US naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan extolled the importance of the Philippines’ “narrow seas.” For much of the twentieth century, it played a central role in US strategy as a key logistics node for American air and naval forces and the geostrategic linchpin between East and Southeast Asia. <clip>

Entire text:

http://csba.createsend1.com/t/y-e-yukyjlt-pthdhdihl-r/

Worth reading.

clip_image002[5]

"Normal" Holocene Weather

Jerry –

In Re: Craig’s comments about Mr. Tips’ assertion that we’ve returned to "Normal Holocene Weather" (and suggestion that Mr. Tips is the only source for such concept).

Searching on "Holocene Weather" (without the "Normal") reveals several sources that suggest that the notion that Holocene Weather can be typically characterized by extremes dates to at least a 1977 publication by H. H. Lamb (Climatic History and the Future) published by the Princeton Press. I found that reference (along with several others from the 1990s) in a paper at:

www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/boyd/AgOrigins.pdf

I’ve attached a copy for your convenience.

This, of course, doesn’t prove the notion, but it should absolve Mr. Tips from any suggestion that he created it from whole cloth.

Most glad to hear of your recovered spirits and energy,

David Smith

Thanks. I remember reading that when it first came out, now that your remind me. It has been said by others.

clip_image003

Normal Holocene weather

This is only more anecdotal evidence, not the reliable source you asked for, but my grandmother, growing up in Fredericksburg, Virginia at the turn of the last century, had ice-skates and skated every winter on frozen pools, if not actually on a frozen river. I grew up near there myself in the 1970’s, and I certainly had neither ice-skates nor the opportunity to use them. Obviously, I wasn’t there, to check her recollection, but I have seen her old ice-skates.

Meredith

Well, few of us remember the Holocene, although Niven and I have written about a time 14,000 years ago just after Atlantis sank when the magic was vanishing. (Burning City and Burning Tower). It’s fairly easy to document that it was much colder in 1776 (cannon dragged across the frozen Hudson to General Washington in Haarlem Heights) and the mid 19th Century (winter markets held on Thames ice, skating on the brackish canals in Holland until late spring, etc.) I don’t think anyone doubts that it is warmer now than it was in the 19th Century. The question is HOW MUCH warmer.

clip_image002[6]

The Ring of Fire is becoming more active…

http://lewrockwell.com/rep3/ring-of-fire-roaring.html

I don’t know whether to blame George W Bush or climate change…

Charles Brumbelow

More active than when? Tambura went off early in the 19th Century and produced the Year Without A Summer (eighteen hundred and froze to death). Krakatoa was pretty spectacular. And don’t forget the ‘Frisco Quake…

clip_image002[7]

‘As work in Soviet archives in recent years has shown, Soviet secret policemen also usually meant what they said.’

<http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/apr/26/vladimirs-tale/?pagination=false>

—-

Roland Dobbins

Putin is very much to be taken seriously. He is not a simple power grubber. He is far more serious than that. I have never understood what we gained in the Balkans when we defied the Russian pan-Slavic interests there.

clip_image002[8]

My Boskone Skype interview with you is up on BYTE.com:

BYTE Interviews Jerry Pournelle

http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/science-tech/232800459

(Byte.com, April 16, 2012)

(And here’s a shortened URL:

bit.ly/HKZhrc

In addition to the audio proper, the interview includes my intro, and the short bio and bibliography, and a transcript. (I did the transcribing myself, probably more work on the transcribing end, but much less on the ‘now what were they really saying’ end. I’m glad I spent the $79 for a USB foot-pedal that works with the free transcribing software).

BYTE split the interview up into four parts — fortunately, I was able to identify good-enough break points, so we/they didn’t have to try cutting-and-pasting audio.

Thanks again for being willing to do the Skype interview from your living room while still being under the weather. I know it made the Boskone program folks very happy to have still been able to have you on at least one program item even though you couldn’t attend in person.

(And I’m glad I brought along an inexpensive digital voice recorder — I had requested Boskone tech crew arrange for capture of the Skype session, but in the hurry and fuss, that request didn’t get to the right person.)

Hope you have recovered from your virus. It was fun talking with you again.

Daniel P. Dern

I’d rather have gone to BOSKONE and I hope to make it next year.

clip_image003[1]

Raining Cats and Dogs

Saw this bit in the Washington Post, and thought of your recent slightly related piece:

http://live.washingtonpost.com/gene-weingarten-120417.html

Kit Case

clip_image002[9]

Why Your Highway has Potholes

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303815404577333631864470566.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

I have an even better idea. Eliminate the gas tax and let the states pay for their own roads in whatever manor they choose.

Phil

Why is anyone surprised? The Iron Law guarantees these results.

clip_image002[10]

It occurred to me I have never read any novels about a race that discovers one of our probes which exited the solar system, then did a search to find us based upon the gold record.

Do you know of any (and I mean good ones, not a hack novel).

I recall the First Star Treck Film, but that does not count…

B

I don’t offhand recall any stories other than V’ger with that theme, but in the real world, anyone who finds one of the Pioneers will be fairly close to Earth. It will be centuries before they are any large fraction of a lightyear away from Sol.

clip_image002[11]

Have you read Harrison Bergeron?  I realized today that affirmative action is a move toward the world of Harrison Bergeron!  If you’re White in this country, you have a handicap placed against you in an effort to make everything "fair" and so everyone can "feel good about themselves".  So, if you’re too smart maybe we should make life a little more difficult for you so that dumb people can feel good?  Affirmative action is ridiculous in 2012; it may have served a purpose for old folks who are now dead, but it seem useless today. 

Like my teacher said, when we read this story as a class:   "We are our own Handicapper Generals and there is no escape."

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

I have recommended Harrison Bergeron since it was first published, and one can forgive Vonnegut much for having written it.

clip_image002[12]

: Everything old is new again…

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/articles/20120418.aspx

Cheap energy = prosperity!

Drill here, DRILL NOW!

David Couvillon

Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, Retired.; Former Governor of Wasit Province, Iraq; Righter of Wrongs; Wrong most of the time; Distinguished Expert, TV remote control; Chef de Hot Dog Excellance; Avoider of Yard Work

.

clip_image003[2]

Young Mensan

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-17702463

* * *

"Mad Science" means never asking, "What’s the worst that could happen?"

–Schlock mercenary

That’s pretty young!

clip_image002[13]

“Amazon wants the price of books to be very, very low — lower than the publishing community can support. Making a book is still a craft industry. Books need to be edited, to be publicized . . . ”

<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/16/business/media/amazons-e-book-pricing-a-constant-thorn-for-publishers.html?&pagewanted=all>

—-

Roland Dobbins

clip_image002[14]

Neutron soup.

<http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/04/neutron-soup-pulsar-creates-new-alien-state-of-matter.html>

—-

Roland Dobbins

clip_image002[15]

clip_image005

clip_image002[16]

Do you believe in ghosts?

View 720 Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Getting closer to catching up, but much of the day was eaten by family matters and some was devoured by locusts.

clip_image002

I was pleased today to find that a review I wrote of Russell Kirk’s fantasy novel is still being read. I wrote it in 1979. Of course I read it again once it was brought to my attention, and it’s still pretty good. In fact it’s darned good, if I do say so.

clip_image002[1]

Once again, I adjourn to mail. But I do recommend you read my old review. It covers a lot of ground.

clip_image002[2]

clip_image003

clip_image005

clip_image003[1]