A mixed bag.

Mail 727 Tuesday, June 05, 2012

clip_image002

Subj: Video: Richard Feynman explains the PDSA cycle, aka the Scientific Method

http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2012/05/17/richard-feynman-explains-the-pdsa-cycle/

Rod Montgomery==monty@starfief.com

Feynman was a highly esteemed lecturer. Alas, he didn’t record that many of them. I used to have lunch with him, McCarthy, and Minsky at periodic intervals when they were in LA. Most impressive lunches I have ever had.

clip_image002[1]

Time for Footfall 2.0?

<http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/05/31/battleship_earth?page=full>

Roland Dobbins

That might be fun, but we have something else to finish first…

clip_image002[2]

Evil Corn Syrup Power

"High Fructose Corn Syrup is a highly processed product that appears to lack the ability of cane and beet sugar to "turn off" the body’s hunger signals."

How fortunate that humans are equipped with a highly specialized and extremely versatile organ called the "brain" that enables them to make their own decisions about hunger signals.

Mike T. Powers

Indeed, but then the notion of freedom seems to be a sometimes thing…

clip_image002[3]

Re: drug shortages

Emailer Joshua Jordan writes: "We have enough money to bomb other countries and grope our citizens, but we don’t have drugs in our hospitals."

What’s happened here is that the FDA decided that it wanted to ensure that drugs were made with what it considered proper quality control, inventory tracking, procedural adherence to avoid lot variation, and so on. The companies that made the drugs insisted that doing this was totally impossible, unworkable, put-them-out-of-business expensive; so the FDA gave them waivers with the intention that the companies work toward compliance at their own speed while under the waivers. And then it came time for the waivers to be reviewed, and the FDA said "so you’ve been working towards compliance then?" and the companies said "well you never actually SAID that we HAD TO, so…" and now the waivers are gone, and the companies can’t sell their drugs anymore because they don’t meet the not-new-but-now-being-enforced standards.

I’m not really sure who to blame here. On the one hand, the companies kind of have a point that they were approved under the old standards and that didn’t seem to bother anyone until just recently. On the other hand, it’s not actually a bad thing to request best-practice processes be used to create drugs.

But on the gripping hand, it’s not like the new standards actually needed to be implemented–we weren’t experiencing wave after wave of people dead and maimed by ten percent variations in the potency of injectable medications–so maybe it’s the FDA’s fault after all, trying to fix what isn’t broken because otherwise they’d have no excuse for insisting that manufacturers of *new* drugs toe the line.

Mike T. Powers

I have yet to find the part of the Constitution that makes any of this the business of the federal government, but then I am a very old school constitutionalist. The federal government can do as it wills with the District of Columbia and can try to persuade the states to copy its policies by showing how well they work. Such as with the DC schools which Congress is certainly responsible for…

clip_image002[4]

My kind of girl – How an immigrant improved morale

Maj. Gen. James M. Gavin, who commanded the 82nd Airborne Division, had a fling with the actress Marlene Dietrich in 1944-1945. This was a departure for Dietrich, as she usually favored frontline enlisted men as lovers. In fact, she once remarked that she had never slept with Eisenhower because he had never been at the Front.

http://www.strategypage.com/cic/docs/cic392b.asp

clip_image002[5]

Proof that there is no intelligent life at NBC.

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/jerry-o-connell-to-play-herman-munster.html

They’ve cast Jerry O’Connell (“Sliders”) to play Herman Munster in a series remake of “The Munsters”.

They’re doing the new show as a one-hour drama (!) series.

This has the potential to have bomb megatonnage in the “Turn-On” range. (Cancelled after one (1) episode aired.)

–John

clip_image002[6]

what the shuttle booster saw

video footage from the boosters

8.5 minutes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2aCOyOvOw5c

– Paul

clip_image002[7]

More kindle koments

Jerry, really liked your daughters Outies, she sounds like an accomplished, intelligent, articulate lady- is she single?

I’m really liking my droidpad-after ‘Outies’ had to get ‘Mote’ and ‘Gripping Hand’; These, ‘West of honor’ as well as a few Scalazi and Vinge shorts and the ‘Galaxy Project’ by Mr. Heinlein should get me through my upcoming Seattle trip,although I have 2 Vinge print books just in case. Of course after reading ‘Secret of Blackship Island’ I’m wanting to read the Avalon books and some Heinlein sounds good as well- but I ramble.

Oh, I was pleased to see the correction Larry made to my hardcover copy of ‘Mote’ you guys autographed had made it to the kindle version !

Hope all is well,

Alan

Thanks. Of course it’s hard to autograph eBooks…

.

clip_image003

Hey Jerry,

Just got to see Prophets of Science Fiction episode 7 featuring Robert A. Heinlein. Given a forty minute length there is not much, which can be comprehensively conveyed about a man’s life and work, especially with the breadth and depth of Robert A. Heinlein’s contributions. Thank you for being part of the show, I imagine there was probably extensive questions you answered for the interview, which are far more interesting and informative than what was included in the show.

Take Care and all my Best

Steve Coates

clip_image002[8]

£30bn bill to purify water system after toxic impact of contraceptive pill

Hi Jerry,

While I’m not surprised that pharmaceuticals and other chemicals in human urine have been evaluated to be a risk for fish populations, It seem like it would be more cost effective to ban or restrict use of any pharmaceuticals that were shown to have such effects that treating waste water to remove or neutralize it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/02/water-system-toxic-contraceptive-pill

Bob Kawaratani

It is a non-trivial problem, and I am unsure as to what should be done. There are some environmental matters that need to be considered. This is one of them.

clip_image002[9]

Sturgeon

Dr. Pournelle:

After seeing the link to the television set made with transparent LEDs–when off, it’s basically a window, I realized that, given the amount of storage possible these days, Sturgeon’s "slow glass" is now possible. Just put a high-res camera (well, a bunch of them so that random bird do-do won’t spoil the effect) at a scenic location, record 24/7 for however many days you want, then send the recording to someone with one of those transparent-screen televisions. Or make the television big enough to fill, say, a picture window. Honking big files, depending upon duration of the recording, but we can now do this. Record for 10 years and the effect will be glass 10 light years thick. (Stories were "Light of Other Days" and, if I recall correctly, "Slow Sculpture".)

I don’t see any way to make money from this deal, but I don’t doubt someone will.

jomath

It is slow glass, isn’t it! Interesting observation.

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

Heavy turnout in Wisconsin–Good news for the Republic

View 727 Tuesday, June 05, 2012

clip_image002

There’s E3 today and tomorrow but I don’t think I’ll be going. I may get up the gumption to go to Steve Leon’s Show Stoppers tonight, but that’s a fight into traffic. We’ll see. Probably not. I’m having trouble getting that interested in what’s going on in electronic entertainment. Everything is getting bigger, faster, and better, and one of these days I’ll probably get in on some of it, but just now my problem is getting some words down on paper – well, into bits on a drive, and that just goes to show that I started in the writing racket when it was words on paper. Ah. Well.

The crucial election today is in Wisconsin. The Republicans will have to win about 5% more vote because we can expect fraud and deception in plenty. The stakes are very high here. Recall shouldn’t be a contest on fund raising, which is what it amounts to. Those who can afford to get the recall on the ballot will be able to devil those who don’t so that eventually you have a one party state. It’s not quite the same as having the bully boys beat up people or feed tham castor oil, but the effect is pretty well the same. The result will be that those with the money – or with paid union workers who can go gather signatures – will be able to drive those who can’t out of political life.

Given that this usually means increasing deficits and greater entitlements, and that isn’t sustainable – see Greece as an example – which will mean – well, what?

We now have more people getting benefits from government than paying taxes.

It can’t go one forever. When something can’t go on forever, it will stop. What comes then? Well, traditionally, you get a friend of the people to become emperor.

clip_image002[1]

More death by drone. The wars of assassination by UAV continue. And the price of do it yourself drones continues to fall. We live in interesting times.

clip_image002[2]

Lines out the door in Wisconsin. Heavy turnout. My guess is that the media would be making a great deal more of this if it were thought that this is indicative of a heavy vote for recall, and thus it indicates the recall’s failure. We can always hope.

clip_image002[3]

Niven and I went up the hill yesterday, and I remain a bit tired. I need to do that more often. It’s good for me, but it does tend to wear me out. And it’s lunch time.

clip_image002[4]

It’s official. By at least 8 percentage points, the recall in Wisconsin has been defeated. I am sure there are many boxes of uncounted ballots ready to be discovered, enough to swing the election to the Democrats even by two percentage points, but this is just too large for them to overcome. Obama and the socialists have lost and the Republic has won this bout.

Wisconsin went heavily for Obama in 2008. It is a state key to his reelection, and he seems to have lost it, first in 2010 when the Democrats lost the state house, and now after the all out effort to recall the governor, by even more. A blue state no more. The Republic may survive after all. If that sounds excessive, apologies; but I am exhilarated. I had hoped for this, and all the indications – including the mainstream media’s reluctance to talk about what was happening – pointed to a larger victory this time than in 2010, but it was not certain. And as I said, there is little doubt that there are undiscovered boxes of ballots – now not ever to be discovered – in reserve had the vote been close.  Or perhaps I am paranoid, and being too hard on the Democrats?  But I don’t think so.

Onward to November. It may be a good year for the Republic. And it is just possible that candidate Romney will take some heart from this. He is the least establishment oriented of the establishment Republicans, and his has the right instincts and principles, and he said

"Tonight voters said ‘no’ to the tired, liberal ideas of yesterday, and ‘yes’ to fiscal responsibility and a new direction. I look forward to working with Governor Walker to help build a better, brighter future for all Americans," he said.

Could it be that he means it? This was a maximum effort mission for the public employee unions and the Democrats, and in a state that they had won in 2008.

So it was a good day.

clip_image002[10]

clip_image002[11]

clip_image004

clip_image006

STAXNET, new credentials, 3-d printing copyrights, UAV’s and assassins, and other fascinations

Mail 726 Saturday, June 02, 2012

clip_image002

Stuxnet Cyberweapon

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

An article by David Sanger published in the June 1st online edition of the NY Times, referenced below, contains new information (or at least new assertions) on the origin and use of the Stuxnet cyberweapon, which you discussed in a past Chaos Manner Reviews column.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/world/middleeast/obama-ordered-wave-of-cyberattacks-against-iran.html?_r=3&pagewanted=2&seid=auto&smid=tw-nytimespolitics&pagewanted=all

I’m very curious as to your thoughts on the article and hope you’ll cover this topic in your upcoming column.

Yours truly,

Jim Bonang

And comes now the new Trojan FLAME. And those are the ones we have heard of. Game on! And note that Russians have great programmers…

clip_image002[1]

Subj: How do credentials change as education goes online?

http://allthingsd.com/20120531/how-do-credentials-change-as-education-goes-online-stanford-and-khan-academy-respond-video/

_The Wall Street Journal_’s Walt Mossberg interviews Stanford’s president and Salman (Khan Academy) Khan:

>>Stanford President John Hennessy and Khan Academy founder Salman Khan

>>are coming at online education from very different angles — one is an

>>elite institution being shaken up by experiments, the other is a

>>widely loved upstart that’s increasingly being used in traditional

>>schools.<<

Rod Montgomery==monty@starfief.com

And of course Kahn Academy free on-line courses contain some of the best lectures I have ever heard. His introduction to calculus is superb and I recommend it to anyone who must learn calculus or who is a bit unsure of how well he learned it in the first place.

Thank you for telling me about this video.

clip_image002[2]

Robert Heinlein and H. Beam Piper

Dear Jerry

Just a bit of idle curiosity; did Heinlein and Piper ever meet or correspond? Did either of them read the others work? I figured you might be the one most likely to know the answer to this question.

best regards

Stacy Brian Bartley

Stacy Bartley

I know they met, because in 1962 at Chicon III I met H. Beam Piper and we became friends; and Saturday night, late, there was a party in Robert Heinlein’s suite. I was invited because Mr. Heinlein and I had been corresponding about aerospace matters and had become friends. Beam and I went to the party together. I don’t remember if they had known each other before although I rather think they did, but they certainly would have met then, Beam, was a bit under the weather and left early. Ginny Heinlein was stuck in an airport somewhere in the Midwest. The party lasted until dawn and ended with watching the Sun rise over the lake. I have no idea whether they read each other’s works, but they were both fairly close friends and two of my favorite people, but I don’t recall either commenting on the other. Mr. Heinlein was of course very successful at that time, and Beam was having financial difficulties.

clip_image003

This is startling:

<.>

Today, the New York Times has a long, detailed article about the personal role played by President Obama in the massive amount of death and destruction the U.S. has brought to the Muslim world at his direction. The article, by Jo Becker and Scott Shane, is based on interviews with “three dozen of his current and former advisers” and thus uses sources who — with a couple of exceptions — attempt to cast the Commander-in-Chief in the best and most glorious possible light. Nonetheless, the article provides as clear a picture of the character of this individual politician as any stand-alone article in some time. Earlier today, I wrote about one specific revelation from the article that I most wanted to highlight — the way in which Obama, in order to conceal the civilian casualties he causes and justify the raining down of death he orders, has re-defined “militant” to mean “all military-age males in a strike zone” – but there are numerous other revealing passages in this article meriting attention.

</>

http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/obama_the_warrior/singleton/

NY Times Article; it very long:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2

So, if I happened to be in a strike zone getting an ice cream cone or buying some silk, I would be considered a militant?  =(  If you weren’t sure if we entered the Twilight Zone, I think we passed the sign long ago…

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

The United States constitution was supposed to prevent foreign adventures by the President, but some of the actions in the campaign against the Barbary Pirates greatly stretched the powers of President Jefferson, and even Jefferson and Madison welcomed that. The traditional compromise for much of our history was that the President owned the Navy and Marines, and the Marine Corps was to be kept small. The Congress owned the Army and the Department of War. This worked until Roosevelt and the threat from Germany with the rise of Hitler, and has completely come apart now.

And while no one dreamed of UAV’s in the days of the Framers, they certainly had heard of assassins, cloak and dagger operations, and such matters.

It becomes increasingly difficult to know with whom we are at war, and which side we are on in the wars in which we are engaged. Or who is winning, or for that matter what “winning” means.

Traditionally the King of England could make war on anyone whom it pleased him to war upon; the Constitution was deliberately designed to take that power away from the President.

If Pakistan were to engage in an attack on the UAV control facilities on the grounds of self defense, would that be war or terrorism? Things have become very confused.

clip_image002[3]

Incredible

We have enough money to bomb other countries and grope our citizens, but we don’t have drugs in our hospitals.  What is wrong with this picture?

<.>

Most of the hospital’s medicines – with usage estimated at $100 million a year – are tracked by automated systems that allow for quick reorders when the supply runs low. But these automated systems, designed to help the hospital avoid purchases and storage costs of unused pills and vials, do not work if it is uncertain when the next batch of drugs will come in.

A few hundred medicines make the list of drugs in short supply: anesthetics, drugs for nausea and nutrition, infection treatments and diarrhea pills. A separate list has scarce cancer drugs for leukemia or breast cancer.

"Now we have to go through the pharmacy and count those drugs on a daily basis … to make sure we don’t run out," said Ed Szandzik, director of pharmacy services at the hospital for over a decade.

The growing scarcity of sterile, injectable drugs is one of the biggest issues confronting hospitals across the country, and will be a key issue at the annual American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago this weekend.

</>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/02/us-drugs-shortages-idUSBRE8500K220120602

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

Twilight zone.

 

clip_image002[5]

‘Napalm Girl’ Photo Turns 40

Jerry

The ‘Napalm Girl’ Photo Turns 40:

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/06/01/napalm-girl-photo-turns-40.html?ESRC=eb.nl

And she is still alive, living in Canada with her husband and their children. There is a story behind it all, of course.

Ed

It is a touching story. I never met her but I know people who were involved in her rescue in those days.

clip_image002[6]

The Obesity Epidemic and Band Aid Solutions

Jerry,

With mayor Bloomberg touting New York City’s latest attempt to curb the Obesity Epidemic, limiting sugar containing drinks to a maximum size of 16 ounces, I am reminded of the myriad of unintended consequences caused by legislated attempts to change behaviors or protect favored classes.

While I have not done much of a data search, it appears to me that the obesity epidemic is more likely to have started with the introduction of high fructose corn syrup as a replacement for cane or beet sugar in both soft drinks and foods, This replacement of sugar appears to be a result of the imposition of Sugar Import Quotas by our geniuses in the United States Congress.

High Fructose Corn Syrup is a highly processed product that appears to lack the ability of cane and beet sugar to "turn off" the body’s hunger signals. The processing of High Fructose Corn Syrup is also energy intensive.

The sugar import quotas are a lose – lose situation and should be abolished forthwith. The long term result should be a healthier population, a reduction in the desire to regulate individual behavior, lowered energy consumption and fewer CO2 emmissions.

Bob Holmes

At least this is a state matter. The states can and should experiment, and will. The difficult thing will be to keep the feds out of this.

.

clip_image002[7]

A jobs program if ever there was one:

<.>

The U.S. Transportation Department shut down 26 bus companies as imminent safety hazards, closing dozens of routes out of New York’s Chinatown in the government’s largest safety sweep of the motor-coach industry.

</>

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-31/chinatown-bus-companies-shut-down-in-federal-safety-sweep.html

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

Subject: Regulation Nation: State sues monks for making caskets (video)

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1664440086001/

Tracy

Subject: A good example of over-regulation

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=174&load=7010

Tracy

No comment required…

clip_image002[8]

[T]he facts don’t matter at all

Dr. Pournelle

"When faced with having to support one side or the other in important science debates, most people are influenced far more by their cultural and social worldviews than by solid science, no matter how well that science is presented. The public, especially those well-versed in science and mathematics, will usually agree with the side that comes closest to the values of the “tribe” they most identify with. In many cases, the facts don’t matter at all."

http://pjmedia.com/blog/climate-change-why-do-the-facts-fail-to-convince/?singlepage=true

Live long and prosper

h lynn keith

Which is why it is important to preserve places in which rational debate takes place. It’s not easy to do.

clip_image002[9]

Clive Thompson on 3-D Printing’s Legal Morass

Jerry

Can the people who sell things copyright physical their physical products?

http://www.wired.com/design/2012/05/3-d-printing-patent-law/

“Observers predict that in a few years we’ll see printers that integrate scanning capability — so your kid can toss in a Warhammer figurine, hit Copy, and get a new one. The machine will become a photocopier of stuff.”

“[T]he longer-term danger here is that manufacturers will decide the laws aren’t powerful enough. Once kids start merrily copying toys, manufacturers will push to hobble 3-D printing with laws similar to the Stop Online Piracy Act. “You’ll have people going to Washington and saying we need new rights,” Weinberg frets. Imagine laws that keep 3-D printers from outputting anything but objects “authorized” by megacorporations — DRM for the physical world. To stave this off, Weinberg is trying to educate legislators now.”

3-D printing. Like the video phone (think Skype and your laptop or your iPhone), the science fiction future seems to have crept up on us.

Ed

Wow. A flood of thoughts here. We’ll be looking at this again. Thanks.

clip_image002[10]

Jerry, the below linked article is a month old, but it sounds like the boffins in Britain are doing something quite keen.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17864782

Best,

Jon

clip_image002[11]

Dr. Pournelle,

To rephrase a letter on your site tonight, Glory and Gold. As you state in "A Step Farther Out" once you get to orbit, you’re half way to anywhere in the system.

I think once we are in orbit, then we are more than halfway to cheap energy. I read your arguments for space based solar plants. I’m a little non-plussed. At one point, you state that DC to DC efficiency is eighty-five percent. Elsewhere, you say 65%. That being said, why are we not already sending our power from space. I’m thinking about posting a kickstarter project to see how many are interested.

Now, to ask a question. Let’s say a non-phsicist, non-engineer were to start looking at design of an O’Neill habitat. Where would he start? Cubic feet per resident? Amount of electricity generated per foot squared of solar panel? Shielding needed? Acres of plants per person?

Is there a checklist out there?

Thanks for not chuckling too hard,

Douglas Knapp

Well, it’s a pretty tough engineering job. O’Neill did some preliminary work, and General Graham’s Journal of the Practical Applications of Space was useful in its time; and of course X Corps and Space X and others are working on how to make money from space. When I wrote Step Farther Our I really though most of that stuff would be happening between 2001 and 2020. I see no reason why it won’t happen, but it hasn’t yet. Given what we spent on space we ought to be in the asteroids now – had a hundred billion dollars been spent as market guarantees and prizes, and another 50 billion in X programs, we would be there. Instead we employed civil servants. Ah well.

clip_image002[12]

Global warming skeptics as knowledgeable about science as climate change believers:

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/05/28/global-warming-skeptics-know-more-about-science-new-study-claims/

Ah! The religious wars of the 21st century.

Ed

No surprises. We still don’t know. And we know how to do Bayesian analyses but we don’t do them.

clip_image002[13]

clip_image005

clip_image002[14]

Dragon, some good news, and speculation on higher education

View 726 Friday, June 01, 2012

The Dragon has landed, an important step in the development of America as a spacefaring nation again. We did not develop the airlines by having the FAA build and operate freight and passenger airlines.

Dragon was developed with some government market guarantees, but it was a fixed price pay on performance contract. Some of the cargo was also pure capitalism: My son Richard is an executive with a company that sells experiment space on the International Space Station (http://moonandback.com/2012/04/09/moonandback-interview-with-richard-pournelle-part-1-nanoracks/ ) and part of the Dragon cargo – both ways – were some of those experiments. Most of it was food, water, and underwear, but there were other commercial aspects to the flight. And now anyone can design and operate experiments in space. Some of them are even cheap. For more on all this, see the rest of Richard’s interview at http://moonandback.com/2012/04/09/moonandback-interview-with-richard-pournelle-part-1-nanoracks/. And then look into his company http://nanoracks.com/.

clip_image002

The revised economic figures are out, and things are worse than reported. Hardly a surprise. Economic reports are always more optimistic than the reality, and they are always revised downward, usually on a Friday, and generally with language that makes it look as if it’s all trivial and routine. So it goes.

And some Democrats are defecting from the attack on capitalism. That would be a very good thing: I would be enormously pleased if there were two political parties who could be trusted with majorities in Congress as well as holding the White House. Alas, there aren’t – indeed, given the performance of the establishment Republicans after Newt Gingrich left Congress, there’s not even one. The only good things I have to say about the Republican regime after the Clinton/Gingrich period is that even a disaster like Obama doesn’t make it look very good.

Anatole France once said that a thief is much to be preferred to a fool, for a thief may upon occasion take a vacation. Substitute ideologue for fool and you get much the same thing. I prefer thieves to ideologues – and given Pournelle’s Iron Law you will not be far from both.

clip_image002[1]

The good news is that it is possible – almost likely – that we’ll have a chance to straighten out this mess after next January. The enemies here are despair and triumphalism. It is possible to win, and to have in both White House and Congress people who understand that Jefferson – said to be founder of the Democratic Party – was right in observing that governments who govern best govern least.

It is also possible to lose. The election will be hard fought, the Democrats will have a ground game that will include questionable tactics, and some actual fraud. Some of us have not forgotten how Cook County delivered Illinois and the presidency to John Kennedy on election night.

The news from Wisconsin is good: no layoffs, no runaway spending, and some success in turning the school system around. What Wisconsin has achieved others can aspire to. And we note that Obama is not going to Wisconsin, even though the recall election is just a few days away. The Democrats started that recall fight. They now wish they hadn’t. But even that one hasn’t been won yet. The unions will have their ground game going, and they play that well. Wisconsin Republicans and Independents and Tea Partiers can’t relax yet.

clip_image002[2]

There’s more good news. On line education is working, and more and more institutions are putting up textbooks and lectures on line. Free. I will have more to say on that presently.

It would now be possible for someone to open an unaccredited University built around a few tutors who work with students, and who direct the students to various on-line books, lectures, demonstrations, and even classes. Were I younger I would contemplate doing that myself – in many respects my undergraduate education was that way, seminars with George Mosse and others, who sent me to various classes. The same later happened with Paul Horst at the University of Washington.

There are good classes out there, from beginning calculus to highly advanced physics, and not just in the sciences. I think it cannot be long before we have great mentors accepting a few students who work with them to coordinate their studies, and students who end up with a far better education than they can obtain anywhere in the world (with a few exceptions: there are, after all, still some places who have great teachers who see students; it’s just there aren’t many).

What we don’t yet have is a means of credentialing; but that will change. As an example, I cannot think that any sane employer would not consider a student mentored online by, say, Jacques Barzun and given a certificate by him to have the equivalent of a degree from Columbia. I made that example up, of course. Another: suppose the late John McCarthy had accepted a half dozen students with whom he met online for an hour a week individually, and perhaps in a general 2 hour conference seminar; and who specified what on-line lectures and courses his charges should take. That, I think, would be superior to most anything Stanford can offer. It’s easy to make up other examples.

We don’t have anything like that yet, but I cannot think it is many years coming. As to fees, those would be negotiable between the mentor and the student. You can speculate on those for yourself.

It’s just a thought.

clip_image003

clip_image003[1]

clip_image002[9]

clip_image005

clip_image002[10]