Ability, capability, legitimacy, amusements.

Mail 735 Thursday, August 02, 2012

clip_image002

Still to ponder…

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/america-goes-jousting/

The comments are even more interesting.

My take is that the US has slowly lost the ability (mind you, not the capability) to conduct light infantry operations. The USMC is taking steps back to that, but it won’t go far enough. The first step would be (should be, HAS to be) ditching body armor. Sending warriors into 4th generation combat weighed down heavier than Lind’s referenced jousters is just plain foolish. Movement, individual firepower, and local command of the situation is vital to winning in a 4th generation scenario. Soldiers have to mingle with the population and be respected by them. The second step is to stop being squeamish about fighting. As Forrest said, "War means fighting, and fighting means killing." The observation goes both ways, but Patton puts additional perspective, "Make the other poor bastard die…." Sadly, I don’t see either of these two steps being accepted by the current political or social climate – even worse, I don’t foresee the US moving close to this in several generations (caveat – unless we engage in another civil war at home). We want war clean, sanitary, and without consequences. Won’t happen. Never has. Never will. Once control is achieved, then the mailed fist can be covered with the velvet glove – sympathy, concern, assistance, and respect can be made to win the day (and it IS day to day! That means a long time) in 4th generation warfare.

I use my own experiences as example. See attached.

s/f

Couv

Cheap energy = prosperity!

Drill here, DRILL NOW!

David Couvillon

Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, Retired.; Former Governor of Wasit Province, Iraq; Righter of Wrongs; Wrong most of the time; Distinguished Expert, TV remote control; Chef de Hot Dog Excellance; Avoider of Yard Work

 

http://www.newsday.com/columnists/other-columnists/this-marine-knows-when-to-put-his-guard-down-1.488969

.

Intangibles vital to change in Iraq
If there is still a lot of danger in Iraq for American troops, there is also an incredible opportunity to help a long-oppressed people get back on their feet and create a working democracy.

We can think of no better example for the people of Iraq than the men and women of the United States, in uniform and in civilian aid services. Our people are there not only to provide security and restoration of essential services. They are there to provide a role model for citizens of a free country.

One unit that is providing aid, tangible and inspirational, to the people of Iraq is the 3rd Battalion of the 23rd Marines, commanded by Lt. Col. David Couvillon and including many Baton Rouge-area reservists.

Couvillon is military provincial governor of Wasit Province, a farming region along the Tigris River south of Baghdad.

Through all sorts of difficulties for the daily life of Iraqis — power blackouts, shortages of essential items, long-term neglect of roads or other essential structures — the Marines toil on. They sleep in a hot hangar at an airfield, and during the hotter days they work on security and trying to restore civic order.

Unemployment and disorganization still are hallmarks of many towns and cities in Iraq.

Couvillon notes that many of the occupation army’s tasks cannot be done overnight, but that expectations among ordinary Iraqis are very high. "It’s hard for people here to see it," he said in a telephone interview. "With America and Great Britain so powerful and so rich, (they want to know) how come it’s not happening right now."

If the Marines can’t work all those miracles, they nevertheless can do a great deal of good in a short time.

But if their contributions to the Iraqi people are tangible and will increase in time, the most important thing is providing leadership on the future of the country — where until recently any dissent was punishable by torture and execution.

Couvillon and his men are also educators, about the importance of liberty and the rule of law. Free enterprise and democracy might not come easily to a people whose lives have been directed from the top down for so long.

Even Wasit’s best-educated residents are ignorant about Western processes and ideas, Couvillon said. "We’re proud that we can bring the idea of freedom and democracy to another country," he said. "Iraq is for Iraqis, and we want to make sure it stays that way."

If the path toward stable and efficient self-government might be a long one, the people of the United States can be proud of the role of Marines and other Americans in building democracy among a people starved for progress and modern ways of life.

.

 

 

 

As you note there is a difference between ability and capability. In 1940 the US had no ability in jungle warfare. As the Japanese learned to their sorrow, we learned fast. If given a mission, the US military responds. If told precisely how to do the work by amateurs and intellectuals, the result is generally a failure. Some Presidents learn fast. Others never do. I see I neglected to post the links to attachments. I will fix that now.

Apologies. I have not way to link to the second article. I seem to be doing something wrong because it wants to link to my own hard drive although it appears on Firefox. I have not time to straighten this out.

clip_image002[1]

Support for Syrian rebels

So the news today President Obama has authorized CIA support for the Syrian rebels.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/02/obama-order-supporting-syria-rebels

These would be the same rebels who are driving Christians out of Syria

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/christians-flee-from-radical-rebels-in-syria-a-846180.html

http://www.rt.com/news/syrian-rebels-desecrate-christian-churches-897/

And who are increasingly allying with Al Queda.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/30/al-qaida-rebels-battle-syria

=====

Hmm … since he’s allying the US with Al Queda, whom we are at war with, does this mean he is affording aid and comfort to our enemies and can be impeached for doing so?

Guess not. Foolishness isn’t an impeachable offense. If it were Washington DC would be empty. And we’d have to put Bush up right next to him in the dock for sending us into Iraq and starting this whole mess in the first place.

Isaiah 3:1-4:

"See now, the Lord .. is about to take from Jerusalem and Judah .. the hero and the warrior, the judge and the prophet, the diviner and the elder, the captain of fifty and the man of rank, the counselor, skilled craftsman and clever enchanter. I will make mere youths their officials; children will rule over them.”

Respectfully,

Brian P.

There are many more interesting questions here. The problem started with Bush I and the notion that we had reached the end of history. Liberal democracy would take over and all would be well. Clinton allowed Allbright to continue the folly of American involvement in the territorial disputes of Europe. Bush I at least had the good sense to get us the hell out of Iraq. Alas, that resulted in massacres – predictable if Hussein were left in power – and huge guilt complexes and the continued delusion that we could play the Empire game. Had we been a real Empire and hired Gurkhas to police Iraq after we broke its army, and sent in security forces to pump oil and pump oil and pump oil so that the price of oil fell to $25/bbl the economy would have boomed – but instead we sent in an arrogantely incompetent civilian pro-consul to undo all the work our Legions had done.

And in Afghanistan we conquered but in our arrogance we thought we could impose the will of Kabul on all of Afghanistan. We could do what Alexander the Great understood he could not do.

We sowed the wind.

We continue to sow the wind. But perhaps we have learned that there are limits to what the Legions can do.

When Napoleon reviewed his army before marching to Russia he is said to have turned to Talleyrand and said “See my splendid army! See how their bayonets gleam.”

“You can do anything with a bayonet, sire. Except sit upon it.”

clip_image002[2]

: Olympic coverage

Dear Jerry

A couple of notes about the Olympic coverage. We watched the opening ceremony and parade of athletes on European television, and the whole thing was seamless. The opening ceremony told the story of Britain – perhaps not to your taste, but nonetheless that’s what it was. The parade of athletes contained only about 1/3 of the total participants, but all countries were represented, and the parade was continuous, with no breaks.

In other words, if you saw chopped up coverage with lots of commercial breaks, this was an entirely American phenomenon!

For the sports coverage itself, we have mostly watched live streams on the Internet. As others have noted: the *lack* of a commentator was a sheer relief. One can watch 2-3 hours of continuous sport, with no commercial breaks, no stupid "personal interest" stories. Without the commentator, you can hear the athletes, their coaches, and the crowd – the atmosphere is as close to "being there" as you can get.

If there is no need for commentators, and network coverage is worse than the raw streams off the Internet, is this the beginning of a sea change for sports coverage?

Cheers

Brad

Well, your TV is better than ours. I suppose what we must do is nationalize the stations? Or perhaps it has something to do with badly written exclusivity laws.

As to whether that was the history of Britain, perhaps my sources are not very good. I have to rely on Macaulay, and Green, and Churchill, and my picture of the rise – and, alas fall – of England is something different from what I saw in the performance there. And were I telling the story of England, and had that much talent at my disposal, I might have thought that Kipling deserved a larger place, and perhaps Churchill, but then I guess one cannot offend the other nations.

I used to do baseball games on radio. I thought the game was more important than what I thought of it.

clip_image003

If this is true, we are doomed.  This President is useless, if this is true:

<.>

The Russian Federation has fulfilled all terms of the agreement. And even more. I shut down not only the Cuban Lourdes but also Kamran in Vietnam. I shut them down because I gave my word of honor. I, like a man, has kept my word. What have the Americans done? The Americans are not responsible for their own words. It is no secret that in recent years, the U.S. created a buffer zone around Russia, involving in this process not only the countries of Central Europe, but also the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus. The only response to this could be an asymmetric expansion of the Russian military presence abroad, particularly in Cuba. In Cuba, there are convenient bays for our reconnaissance and warships, a network of the so-called "jump airfields." With the full consent of the Cuban leadership, on May 11 of this year, our country has not only resumed work in the electronic center of Lourdes, but also placed the latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" on the island. They did not want to do it the amicable way, now let them deal with this," Putin said.

</>

http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/01-08-2012/121804-russia_army_base-0/

Cuban Missile Crisis II?  And, I’m sure this President wouldn’t want to do anything before the election….

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

Well, that is one way to get our attention. I must be alone in believing that Mr. Putin has better motives than are usually imputed to him, given the needless insults the United States flings toward him and his people. I thin he believes himself a patriot, and a pan-slavist, and I do not think we take him seriously enough. The US and Russia have many common interests, although we do not seem to notice that. And what would constitute a legitimate government in Russia?

clip_image002[3]

Islamists in North Mali Stone Couple to Death http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/31/world/africa/couple-stoned-to-death-by-islamists-in-mali.html

By ADAM NOSSITER

BAMAKO, Mali–Islamists in control of a town in northern Mali stoned a couple to death after accusing them of having children outside of marriage, a local official who was one of several hundred witnesses to the killings said Monday.

The official said the bearded Islamists, armed with Kalashnikov rifles, brought the couple into the center of the town of Aguelhok from about 12 miles away in the countryside. The young man and woman were forced into holes about four feet deep, with their heads protruding, and then stoned to death at about 5 a.m. Sunday, the official said.

"They put them into the holes, and then they started throwing big rocks, until they were dead," the official said, speaking by satellite phone from the remote desert town near the Algerian border.

"It was horrible," he said, noting that the woman had moaned and cried out and that her partner had yelled something indistinct during the attack. "It was inhuman. They killed them like they were animals."

The continuing joys of diversity. Perhaps Egypt will move toward this. Or Syria. Does anyone know?

clip_image003[1]

Lights going out

We’ve already discussed this, but even the Washington Post is now noticing that the power grid is having trouble.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/aging-power-grid-on-overload-as-us-demands-more-electricity/2012/08/01/gJQAB5LDQX_story.html

"The U.S. grid is aging and stretched to capacity. More often the victim of decrepitude than the forces of nature, it is beginning to falter. "

What is that line you are always quoting?

"We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place,
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome."

Literal, in this case.

Respectfully,

Brian P.

And the gods of the copybook headings, with terror and slaughter return. When you sow the wind…

clip_image002[4]

Speed kills! US Navy targets hypersonic, GPS-guided bullets — RT

http://rt.com/usa/news/navy-hypersonic-gps-bullets-701/

Remember the old cartoons where a bullet could chase you around a corner? What if that bullet was fired at 5,600 mph from an Electromagnetic Rail Gun? If the US Navy has its way, these sci-fi,supersonic GPS-guided projectiles could soon be a reality.

The futuristic munitions come as part of the US Office of Naval Research’s (ONR) Hyper Velocity Projectile program, which was announced on July 19. The agency’s researchers hope to develop equipment that would allow high-velocity weapons to accurately strike far-away targets – without having to depend on rocket propulsion, Military and Aerospace Electronics reports.

The Navy hopes the supersonic ammunition, with a potential “in-flight retargeting” capability, will be compatible with both its conventional guns, like the Mk 45 155-millimeter gun systems, as well as its experimental 20–32MJ railgun systems, which fire projectiles using electrical energy instead of chemical propellants.

The bullets are slated to be two feet long, weigh somewhere between 20 and 30 pounds, and have a range of 30 to even 200 miles depending on the system deploying them.

Significant in-flight retargeting of (more or less) ballistic ammo is a nice feature.

John

John Harlow

clip_image002[5]

‘Homeland Security’ issuing YouTube takedown notices.

<http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120720/02530219774/homeland-security-issuing-its-own-dmca-takedowns-youtube-to-stifle-speech.shtml>

Roland Dobbins

What an astonishment!

clip_image002[6]

Muller not a skeptic?

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

I read with interest the link on your site which showed statements by

Dr. Muller which showed that he was not a skeptic. I have another source (sent by a liberal friend) which shows statements he has made recently which do indeed show skepticism.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Richard_Muller.htm

So if all the statements by the parties by your previous correspondent

and this one are correct, it appears that he has gone back and forth on the issue more than once.

Regardless, I do still agree that this adds nothing new to the debate

— the facts are as they are, and the conversion of one person to one side or another persuades no one who is not already amenable to Appeal to Authority.

Respectfully,

Brian P.

That’s the point. But I got so much mail on it that I thought it ought to be mentioned.

Jerry Pournelle

Chaos Manor

clip_image002[7]

Elon Musk mentions that James Cameron has "Birth of Fire" in LA Times

Please don’t use my name if you publish this.

There is an interview with Elon Musk in the LA Times on August 1st, 2012 which says:

> The movies provide us with two space future models: "Star Trek," where a government agency governs space, versus "Alien," where a private space mining company makes its own rules.

>

> We need a new archetype. I’ve talked to James Cameron about this. He’s got a script for a realistic Mars mission because there’s not been a good Mars movie. That’s another thing that bugs me: The Mars movies have been so bad. I mean, honestly! And it’s going to be tricky getting funding for another Mars movie after"John Carter." It was a good comic book, and they totally screwed up the movie.

Mr. Cameron had intended Birth of Fire to be his next movie before he was persuaded that the technology existed to let him do Avatar. Perhaps he will consider it now. Needless to say, my Mars story has little in common with John Carter of Mars. Indeed, it remains quite consistent with what we know about Mars. And it takes place with technology we could build now if we wanted to. I believe the option he bought has expired but I would be glad to discuss renewal. He’d make a great movie of it.

clip_image002[8]

NBC commentators

Jerry:

You write of "NBC commenters who made sure that no part of the ceremony was unaccompanied by mindless chatter".

Don’t you know commentators, journalists, and anyone even remotely connected with reporting are all the real stars of the show? The Olympics exist only to make TV journalists and commentators look good.

That’s why, for example, reporters are so irate when a Presidential candidate doesn’t give them the attention they deserve.

…………Karl Lembke

clip_image002[9]

clip_image005

clip_image002[10]

Horror in Hershey? Teach your kids to read. And some thoughts on legitimacy in government.

View 735 Thursday, August 02, 2012

I’ve been working on fiction for the last couple of days. I even took a few hours off for social activities. And it’s very hot in Los Angeles.

clip_image002

I have no knowledge of this incident other than various repetitions of the story originally posted in a fundraising appeal by the Home Schooling Defense Association, an organization I am not familiar with. The story is so horrifying that I would have thought it would be all over the news by now, with every major network – and certainly Fox and Newscorp – sending teams of reporters, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania sending in a team of investigators looking for corroboration leading to changes of kidnapping, assault, perjury, malfeasance in office, and various criminal offenses on the part of both lay and medical bureaucrats in the “Hershey Medical Center—a state-affiliated hospital in Pennsylvania.” I put that in quotes because there are at least two Hersey Medical Centers in Pennsylvania. One is the expected center in Hersey, PA (expected because Hersey has a long history of providing for the residents of Hersey) but I would not have thought that a state-affiliated hospital; and the other a state facility in State College, PA.

The HSLDA story told by its chairman Michael P. Farris, Esq. does not identify which. Of course Mr. Farris is a lawyer and institution chairman, not a reporter; but still, you would think that this would be an important detail.

The story is told in some detail under the title Newborn Seized in Hospital by Police, Social Worker

http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/pa/201203270.asp.

It is truly horrifying, and as I said, it is a story that one would think would be all over the headlines of every paper in the country. In my search for some details not given in the story – such as where the hospital is, and some of the names of people involved – I found numerous web sites I have never visited before telling the story, but they were all repetitions – some with emotional enhancements – of Mr. Farris’s story, and none told me more than he had.

I first heard of this story in email from a friend and frequent correspondent pointing me to http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/mom-booted-from-hospital-as-baby-snatched/ on the WND website, another with which I have no familiarity.

My problem here is that what is alleged is horrifying and should be told widely: but I can’t find any account of it other than repetitions of the original post in Mr. Farris’ fundraising appeal, and while I have absolutely no evidence that Mr. Farris is not scrupulously correct in his account, it is clear that he was not a witness, and he gives no sources.

If any substantial part of this story is true, then we can expect to see criminal arrests in either Hersey, PA or State College, PA, and some attention paid to the matter, and I can add this to my examples of the workings of the Iron Law of Bureaucracy.

I have now found this: http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/03/williamstown_couple_sues_penn.html which establishes that this was the Penn State facility at State College, and gives the names of the parents and the judge who returned their child to their custody, so apparently at least some of this horrifying story is based on facts. Whether the location in State College PA has any bearing I can’t determine, but it wasn’t the town of Hersey. Penn State is much more interested in football than chocolate.

= = = =

Alert. The following is an advertisement.

I note that this involves home schooling. The most important thing schools can teach the young in the Unites States is to teach them to read. Most don’t. If your school talks about ‘reading at grade level’ they are not really teaching the kids to read. Find out more at http://www.readingtlc.com/ which is the home ground of Mrs. Pournelle’s reading program. It’s old, it’s hokey, and it just plain works.

clip_image002[1]

Subject: Metformin, B-12 and calcium

Jerry, one of your correspondents reports that the metformin she takes is depleting her B-12 and calcium. I’m very sorry to read that, but I’d like to point out that although metformin certainly can have that effect, it doesn’t always, or even usually. How do I know? Well, I’ve been taking it for about a decade now. As you know, I’ve also been hospitalized twice with ITP, resulting from a dangerously-low platelet count and one of the things your body uses B-12 for is building platelets. On two separate occasions, I’ve asked my hematologist (As chance would have it, I got lucky and was assigned to the head of the department at the West LA VA Hospital.) if this might be a factor and both times he assured me that it wasn’t. Yes, there’s no doubt that it can happen, but I didn’t want all of your readers who are taking metformin to be unduly worried.

I have taken metformin for about ten years myself, and I have had no problems. I do sometimes take a B-100 when I think of it, but that’s not part of my usual witch’s brew. On the gripping hand I do take a broad spectrum of vitamin and mineral supplements, most of them undoubtedly making expensive urine and making my kidneys work a bit harder, but something seems to be keeping m going at my age.

I have taken metformin for more than a decade. I continue to take the recommended dosage, and my sugar is reasonably well under control: I do eat lots of salads, and we walk a mile every other day.

clip_image003

Thinking about Syria

I am preparing a short piece on US interests and options in Syria, and by extension, the Middle East, Arab Spring, Moscow Spring, and the general unrest in the world. I don’t call it an essay because I am not sure I will have any conclusions. The problem with the world is that we no longer have any agreement – anywhere – on just what is legitimacy in government. The US principle is that: All men are created equal. They are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. Among these rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the latter of which is interpreted as a right to security in their property. To secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the government.

Legitimate government, then, is government by consent of the governed, and all of politics is just a means for discerning what is the consent of the governed.

What happens when the governed do not all consent to the same thing? As for example, if some part of the population is considered unequal and not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? This was the basis of the principle constitutional crisis of the United States from its beginning, through the Civil War, and into modern times. There is no agreement on just what ‘Created Equal’ means, and particularly when we are also told that among our rights is the right to reject the very notion of a Creator and the right to forbid the majority of the governed from exhibiting religious symbols such as the Ten Commandments at Courthouses, or crèches and menorahs in the public parks, or opening public ceremonies with an Invocation and closing them with some form of Benediction. If we reject the Creator we are thrown upon science to determine what “created equal” means, and science is a weak reed indeed for supporting that proposition. After all, we are shown every night on television men and women doing things few of us aspire to, and very graphically demonstrating that we are not their equals. We see television shows demonstrating that some people appear to be more intelligent than the rest of us. We all grew up on stories about heroes, and our comic books don’t even pretend to equality. What does it mean, equal?

And just who are the governed, and how do we measure their consent? We don’t allow children under age 18 to vote, and when I was young that age was 21, although the age of military service was 18, or 17 with parental consent or with the willing collusion of a recruiting sergeant. There were good reasons for limiting the voting age to 21, and there are still good reasons for not lowering it to, say, 14 which is when young Roman boys were subject to conscription.

In a reasonably homogeneous society it might make sense to take a majority vote and call that ‘consent of the governed’. Give that society enough diversity and the situation changes. If we take a vote among chickens and foxes as to which shall be dinner for the other, the loser is unlikely to believe that this is a valid procedure. The chickens will appeal to the farmer, who will drive away the foxes, and the chickens can now appeal to the good will and self interest of their protector to keep them for their eggs at least until they are beyond egg-laying age.

Similar arguments have been made by Civil Rights groups for centuries. Tennessee had fair elections before and after the Civil War, but it had legal segregation when I was growing up. We were taught the principle of consent of the governed in US history in grade school, and we all – well, all of us in the white classrooms – saw no conflict of principle.

Pass now to the Middle East, where there are racial, tribal, religious, and religious sectarian differences that make the legally segregated South of my youth look like a vary good deal for minority and majority alike. In Syria, an Arab tribe called the Alawi have long been a warrior caste – when the French governed Syria under mandate they recruited soldiers largely from the Alawi minority, and the fierce fighting ability of the Alawites is mentioned in accounts written during the Crusades – and the Alawi have been the traditional governing class. The Alawi are Shiite, and some Shiite scholars consider them heretics; and of course the Sunni majority of Syria consider them heretics because they aren’t Sunni. As to the Sunni, the Saudi royal family has long made alliance with the Wahabi who insist on strict adherence to Islamic law. That includes levying tribute on Christians and Jews.

Much of the support for the Syrian rebels comes from Saudi Arabia, and with that aid come some Wahabi clerics. Al Qaeda is strictly Sunni Muslim.

The Alawi government, being a minority itself, traditionally had more tolerance for Christian, Jews, animists (not many of those in Syria), atheists and general secularism than do either their Wahabi enemies or their Shiite Iranian allies and supporters.

There were similar differences in Egypt, and after Egypt fell to 100,000 demonstrators who convinced the world that the Egyptian Army did not have the consent of the governed, the ancient Christian communities in Egypt were under attack. The Christian have not consented to be persecuted. The Army used to protect them.

There are similar stories in other parts of the world. It is clear that Russia has no concept of what a legitimate government might be. Communism under Gorbachev? When the old line communists tried to overthrow Gorbachev, the result was Yeltsin. Under Yeltsin the corruption increased to spectacular levels, so much so that it horrified the KGB, who promised to end much of the corruption. Enter Putin. What is not seen here is any concept of what would legitimize government in Russia. Return of the Tsar?

The appeal of Monarchy is that the monarch is supposed to protect everyone. The price of monarchy is that there is no pretense of equality.

We can be sure that a majority vote among illiterates will not make for a very effective government. Or will it? And is it legitimate? At one time legitimacy had to do with who had hereditary rights. We have scrapped that in the United States, and we now seem to think that only a plebiscite can legitimize a government. The problem is that a plebiscite may incite the winner to finish off a minority. Particularly in cases such as the Kurds of Iraq, or the Alawi of Syria.

More on this later; for now I leave for lunch, and you can contemplate – just what would legitimize governments in: Iran. Iraq. Egypt. Libya. Tunisia. Morocco. Chad. Arabia. Qatar. Kuwait where American guns restored the Royal Family which spent the First Gulf War in London casinos. Bosnia. Serbia. Croatia. Pakistan. Uzbekistan. I could continue.

And not all that long ago the neocons were talking about the end of history.

clip_image003[1]

I am going to have lunch now.

clip_image002[2]

Sir John Keegan, RIP

Thought you would want to know, since many of his books made it into your recommendation lists over the years:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/culture-obituaries/books-obituaries/9447744/Sir-John-Keegan.html

Lawrence Person

I have indeed recommended his books over the years. RIP

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

Vitamins, warming, credentials, distance learning, and other important matters.

Mail 735 Monday, July 30, 2012

On Vitamins

I just discovered that the metformin I’m taking for insulin resistance depletes my supply of B12 and folic acid, and interferes with calcium! The calcium shouldn’t be an issue because I consume dairy products out the wazoo, but no WONDER the B complex has been helping!

-Stephanie

Folic Acid

The problem with folic acid is that the body does not use folic acid, it uses the l-methylfolate found in fresh food. Folic acid has to be converted to l-methylfolate before the body can use it, and the process of conversion can be reduced by several factors. Aging, the MTHFR gene defect, and low levels of the required B vitamins can all reduce the amount of folic acid that is converted.

This is bad because if you are not converting enough folic acid, not only do you suffer from low levels of l-methylfolate, you also suffer from the build up of folic acid.

Anyway, all of this is new science. I only know about it because it turned up in the raw data on my 23andMe genetic report. It is a very common defect. I have it, my husband has it, and 40% of the population has it. I have had very good results with switching to l-methlfolate. I strongly believe that it is the way to go.

cynthia allingham

As I have said, I know of one case in which folate deficiency in a young woman taking more than the government recommended amounts at the time she conceived had really severe effects on the child at birth. I have been unwilling to trust the government’s recommendations since that time (they have since been revised up, but the damage was very real and no apology was ever issued). Oops. But they’re from the government and their intentions were good.

clip_image002

Global Warming implies two things…

Jerry:

Interesting piece suggesting skepticism might be more appropriate than credulousness in re Global Warming. I’ve always thought that "Global Warming" should at least require two things: 1) Warming, and 2) Global effect.

Alas, here in Central Florida we are noticing a sustained cooling trend over the last 30 years (I lived here first in 1979). Where we used to be able to grow virtually anything without regard to "cold hardiness", we now find that winters routinely bring us occasional temperatures below freezing — even in the 20s! Fortunately, such temperatures don’t last long, but they do occur every year — and more than once — whereas decades ago a "hard freeze" (i.e., temps below 28) meant a "historic" cold winter.

In fact, the climate trend here can be encapsulated in a simple question: "How many commercial orange growers are there in "Orange" County, FL?" Answer: "NONE any more." That’s right — the county named after the fact that it was once virtually wall-to-wall orange groves now has none still in commercial production. The reason? Growers — who 30 years ago only had to resort to burning "pitch-pots" perhaps one night during a freak cold wave once every few years when the jet stream dipped unusually low and drove cold Canadian air into the area — slowly moved southward as the winters became more cold more often and it became impossible to keep fruit from freezing by any man-made means.

So how is it Global Warming if it is not warming globally?

Gary Cordelli

I still do not know how to take the temperature of Florida, much less compare it to a temperature of some years ago; but the need for smudge pots/acre for a year ought to be documented back quite a few years. I wonder if the climate people have looked at that.

clip_image003

Olympic trivia.

Dr. Pournelle,

I agree completely with your words about the execrable Olympic announcers. A rational television network covering the Olympics would leave the announcers at home–they add nothing and simply boost the taurocoprolite level. (The words based upon your new construction need to be in the Oxford English Dictionary–soonest! So should "congresscritter," which I find myself using with increasing frequency.)

At the opening, there was a boy soprano of remarkable skill singing "Jerusalem"–when he finished the solo and the choir began singing, the announcer (Meredith Viera, I believe) broke in with a discussion about the use of ‘culturally significant’ choirs. Might have been an interesting piece of trivia, but the timing was terrible.

This was infuriating for two reasons: I was listening to the choir, and her comments literally drowned them out; the other reason being the fact that "Jerusalem" is held in about the same esteem in Britain as "My Country, ‘Tis of thee" or "God Bless America" and no British announcer would have been so crass as to comment during a worldwide performance of those songs. There should be two audio channels–one for the actual event and the idiot announcers, one that’s full audio but has no verbal comments.

Give me an announcer-free Olympics. I can make my own ignorant comments and think my own trivial thoughts. And I know better than to yammer during "Jerusalem."

jomath

Hi Jerry

I just wanted to correct a couple of small errors that crept into your comments on the Olympics.

Firstly, no troops were brought back from overseas to man the Olympics – some did have leave cancelled though.

The parade of athletes was sped up because they have previously taken an age – not for ads – we don’t have them on the BBC. If you meant just on NBC then I beg your pardon.

On another point, Romney was rude when a guest – I don’t put up with that from guests and I guess you and Roberta don’t either.

Finally, I would like to log my admiration at the invention

(re-discovery?) of taurocoprophogeny – meretricious, if unworthy, of you.

Kind Regards

Kevin Crisp

My paper reported it as troops called back from the Afghan war; thanks for the correction. My paper also had a column by someone who watched the parade on BBC without commercials and was then horrified to see what NBC showed in the US.

We have to disagree about rudeness. Given what actually has happened so far, Mr. Romney was no more than truthful: stuff happens, and those in charge are often surprised. He carefully included himself among those not prepared for everything. I do not think it rude not to engage in fulsome praise. Perhaps it would have been better manners if Mr. Romney had simply dodged the question, but you may be sure he would then have been castigated for his cowardly behavior.

olympics coverage rant

Jerry,

For the second or third Olympics in a row, the tv coverage of the Olympics has been horrible. I’m not talking about event selection or schedule, I’m talking about technical details of recording video in one place and playing it back in another.

I was watching the coverage on NBC last night and it was absolutely terrible from a technical perspective. Every 3-5 minutes the video would cut out, back up or speed forward a few seconds, and re-start. Audio would un-sync from video. In three cases, they cut to commercial after a gymnastics performance but before the scores were given, and not cover the score, even briefly, after the commercials were over.

NBC paid millions for the right to be the exclusive channel outlet for Olympics coverage, and they can’t even get the basics correct. My elementary school news channel was run better by a couple of chatty 5th graders.

And of course my other rant is about the seating scandal…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/london-2012/9434744/London-2012-Olympics-Empty-seats-on-the-opening-day-prompts-investigation.html

Hundreds (thousands?) of seats and tickets were given to media outlets and corporate sponsors, who failed to use them. So thousands of seats are going empty in some of the most popular and sold out events. I think the event organizers should immediately pass a new rule stating that if a corporate or media venue ticket goes unused, that organization loses their seat for the remainder of the Olympics and the seat tickets can be re-sold at the venue box-office. There are a few million people who would give a body part to be able to attend, so if the seats are empty the tickets should be forfeit, period.

Empty seats at the Olympics are a crime… This is a big deal to a lot of people and anyone who cares about it so little as to not use huge blocks of tickets while thousands wait outside should simply not be pandered to.

Sean

clip_image002[1]

Quoth Richard Muller, noted skeptic of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change (nee ‘global warming’).

Hello Jerry,

In view of of your commentary today ("That seems an appropriate setting for thinking about global warming and the surprise defection of Muller from the ranks of the Deniers, accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley."), I thought you may be interested in this. It is not from me, but from one of Dr. Judith Curry’s readers, ‘pokerguy’:

“pokerguy | July 29, 2012 at 7:18 am | Reply

Yay. Countdown to Anthony. First thing I thought of when I woke up this morning. I need therapy.

As to Muller’s NYT’s “Amazing Grace” piece (I once was blind but now I see), here’s a comment by poptech on Bishop Hill:

The Truth about Richard Muller

http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/06/truth-about-richard-muller.html <http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/06/truth-about-richard-muller.html>

“I was never a skeptic” – Richard Muller, 2011

“If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008

“There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.” – Richard Muller, 2006

“Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

As for the ‘Opening Ceremonies’, "You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din." I would have watched them under the direct supervision of a SWAT team, IF they had a notarized court order authorizing them to use deadly force to ENSURE that I did. Maybe.

Bob Ludwick

Clearly many are better informed about Mr. Muller than I am. I don’t remember ever hearing of him before although I may actually have met him.

clip_image003[1]

The Chick-Fil-A distraction

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

I think this guy hits the nail on the head.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/07/most-important-legacy-of-obamas-gay-marriage-switch-was-freeing-dems-to-play-the-bigot-card/#comments

It’s a distraction. The administration know it can’t run on it’s record so they’re playing the bigot card. Which they couldn’t do so long as President Obama still opposed gay marriage. Once he flipped, they were free to unleash vicious assaults —

— vicious assaults which have no teeth. They can’t withhold business licenses without violating the first amendment, and there’s no pending legislation on gay marriage either to sign or to veto. There’s almost been a truce in the culture war for four years as everyone’s been trying to get the economy back on track.

It appears the the administration has given up on that tack and figures they can win by throwing red meat to their base — red meat which has no effect save to rile up the rubes in the cheap seats, get them marching down to the polls and donating and volunteering. Certainly Obama’s donations recently haven’t been all they would hope for.

http://www.examiner.com/article/large-donations-for-obama-are-down

Since President Obama has lost his ability to charm, he now depends on demonizing Romney as much as he possibly can. Ironic that the President who ran on "Hope and Change" and on uniting different sections of the country is in fact running one of the most divisive campaigns I can remember. Maybe Johnson vs. Goldwater was this rough, but I’m hard pressed to think of any other democrat in living memory who waged social war with this level of vigor.

Respectfully,

Brian P.

I always thought it a distraction and I have paid little attention to it. I expect there are many CEO’s of companies I buy from who hold views I detest. There are others who say things I agree with. I am told that Henry Ford was an unpleasant man with some very regrettable views, but his cars were pretty good stuff.

clip_image002[2]

‘RAND looked at 588 air-to-air shoot-downs since the 1950s and counted just 24 that occurred with the attacker firing from beyond visual range. Historically, American long-range air-to-air missiles have been 90-percent less effective than predicted, RAND asserted.’

<http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/07/f-22-germans/>

Roland Dobbins

We did operations studies like that when I was in the business, and I am not entirely surprised. Of course when we were doing those studies in the 1960’s there were fewer cases of shoot downs after WW II, and most of our data came from WW II and Korea.

clip_image002[3]

Subject: City shuts down teen’s hot dog stand

Here’s a story when a thirteen year old young man took initiative to help his disabled parents, and the government couldn’t hardly wait to shut him down.

But…a business stepped and not only made it right, but better.

There’s a lesson for the big government advocates here somewhere….

http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/07/27/city-shuts-down-teen-hot-dog-stand?hpt=hp_bn15

Tracy

Astonishing.

clip_image002[4]

Education Without Schools

Jerry,

I have had personal experience with early "distance learning" technology. When I was in high school in the 70’s, I took a calculus class offered to seniors who had taken all other math classes offered in the school. The school did not have a teacher qualified to teach calculus, however, and the course was provided on open real video tape. The teacher assigned as our "advisor" was not interested in answering questions or clarifying points in the presentation and neither were the tapes — no matter how many times we rewound and re-played the tapes, they said the same thing in the same way! (Amazing, isn’t it?). To make a long story short, I was determined to learn calculus, so I started collecting calculus text books, looking for different explanations of the then obscure points in the video lectures. Eventually I had twelve books. The trick worked; I learned calculus and I explained to the rest of the class what I learned as I learned it.

Distance learning is not the same today as it once was. I have enrolled my son (whom you met at Liberty Con) in a home school curriculum for high school as I have lost all faith in the public school system. He will receive live lectures on his computer with question/answer sessions as well as the ability to review the lectures at will as recordings with supplemental material linked in. He will also have the benefit of live instruction from my wife and myself, both of college level education — she in the arts and myself in engineering and the sciences. I know he will receive four times the education that the public high school could provide and likely in half the time.

Kevin L. Keegan

Well of course it is not the same, just as I am not operating with a Z-80 and a screen that gives 24 lines of text and text only.

Kahn Academy has shown that introductory calculus can be taught by a computer lecture. I doubt yours was better than his.

And yes not everyone will get it from Kahn’s lecture just as not everyone got it from Calculus Made Easy; but should the entire middle class be saddled with lifelong debt because some don’t learn from on screen lectures?

The system has become monstrous, and I do not think it can be fixed. More, there will be more movements to force people to send their children to credentialed schools. The unions will never give up this income stream. The harm to the next generation is monstrous, but My God How The Money Rolls in.

Coursera seems to be trying to address increasing interaction during online learning. I learned about them reading an article in the paper about your alma mater joining there program.

coursera.org

I am sure they or someone like them are working on the accreditation anlge.

tonyb

clip_image002[5]

PETA takes ‘bets’ on when senator will die after objection to USDA vegetarian push

Both this and the Chick-Fil-A issue show just how much the liberals venom and hate they can generate against anyone they disagree with, even over a small matter. The odd thing is that they don’t even notice the hypocrisy of it, despite all their claims of being intellectuals.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has started taking "bets" on its website over when Sen. Charles Grassley will die, after the Iowa Republican scolded the Department of Agriculture for advocating a vegetarian diet.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/peta-takes-bets-on-when-senator-will-die-after-objection-to-usda-vegetarian/?test=latestnews#ixzz21qOXTAu4 <http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/peta-takes-bets-on-when-senator-will-die-after-objection-to-usda-vegetarian/?test=latestnews#ixzz21qOXTAu4>

clip_image002[6]

Education Credentials

Dear Jerry,

>>We need a way to provide credentials to the qualified and otherwise get out of the way.<<

The primary reason a Credential is even wanted is to satisfy archaic state occupational licensing laws and regulations. This is where the Government-Education Complex enforces its monopoly. Part of the licensing requirement is invariably displaying a Credential from an "accredited" learning institution. The theory is that possession of this Credential is evidence of minimal competency in the referenced subject matter for engineers, lawyers and barbers. Sometimes this theory intersects reality.

This political field of licensing is where change needs to be focused. If Mike Johns and others feel the need for a high cost traditional college education they should certainly be able to get (and pay) for it. But that does not justify inflicting the extremely high costs of the educational cartel on others who do not need their services, or for depriving yet others of opportunity simply because they don’t have a certain quantity of Federal Reserve currency to hand over to accredited rent-seekers.

The short solution is provide fee-based subject matter testing and open these tests to all comers. The current College Board CLEP test structure shows what reasonable test fees are.

Professional bodies are playing an obstructive role. ABET for instance http://www.abet.org/ is the cartel enforcer for "applied science, computing, engineering, and technology programs". Its principle power derives from the fact that state occupational licensing boards typically require an ABET accredited degree or evaluated equivalent to even apply for engineering and other technology occupation licensing.

The various engineering specialties are excellent candidates for standardized bar exam style processes. My own expectation is this would turn into a Warren Buffet type low tide swimming event whereby we discover who is skinny dipping. In other words, numerous expensive "accredited" schools would be discovered to be accrediting graduates with deficient knowledge in their nominal degree fields.

And speaking of bar exams, the bar exams and law licenses should also be RE-opened to anyone willing to pay the licensing fees and able to pass the tests. Is there any reason Law shouldn’t revive a master-apprentice style of training? That is, any reason other than the desire of the Harvard and Yale law school faculties to collect high salaries and wield unchecked ideological power? I have heard that even Yale Law School grads like Hillary Rodham Clinton have needed two or three swings to pass their bar exams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_and_career_of_Abraham_Lincoln#Politics_and_the_law

"In March 1836 Lincoln took the first step to becoming a practicing attorney when he applied to the clerk of the Sangamon County Court to have himself registered as a man of good and moral character. After passing an oral examination by a panel of practicing attorneys Lincoln received his law license on September 9, 1836 and in April 1837 he was enrolled to practice before the Supreme Court of Illinois."

Missing from this account is any mention that Lincoln ever attended an "accredited law school", let alone received a J.D. or Ll.d.

Best Wishes,

Mark

One reason for credentials is to avoid lawsuits under affirmative action and Americans with Disabilities Act and other egalitarian regulations and laws. Insisting on credentials gets the personnel manager off the hook for a number of cases. Of course it also make their job much harder.

Repeal a lot of the ‘discrimination’ regulations and you will see in general more people hired on the basis of ability and fewer on credentials. Or that’s my opinion.

clip_image002[7]

Vitamins and other stuff

Jerry,

For what it’s worth, here’s my two cents on the vitamin issue. Note that much of this depends on conversations (from the mid-1990s) with the late Mike Lalor, and on some conversations with my current physician.

Pursuant to bone spurs, I have taken 400 – 800 IU of ergocalciferol (Vitamin D-2, described as the water soluble vitamin of the D-complex) as protection against bone spurs. Anecdotally I can report that pain medically diagnosed as a bone spur (which would require surgical intervention in the form of "scraping the bone") goes away when I take at least 400 IU daily and returns if I miss doses for something less than a week. However, this dosage has NOT been adequate in maintaining my serum level of Vitamin D as measured by blood testing, and the doctor has placed me on additional supplements of Vitamin D-3.

On Lalor’s advice I started the following regimen for varicose veins, which I have been plagued with for most of my adult life:

Vitamin C, 1000 – 2000 mg daily, primarily as an anti-coagulant Vitamin E, 400 – 800 IU daily in the form of "natural mixed tocopherol" (NOT the alpha-tocopherol of most Vitamin E supplements) as an anti-oxidant and natural lubricant of the cardiovascular system.

Niacin , 100 – 200 mg daily, as a vasodilator. For this to work, one cannot use the no-flush variety, but one adapts.

The supplements biorutin (500 – 1000 mg daily) and butcher’s broom (1-2 standard tablets) today, which together supposedly provide fuel to stimulate rebuilding the cardiovascular system.

I can report that my veins got worse when I ignored this regimen for a year or so, and that after restarting it at the higher dose, not only do I have fewer instances of leg pain, but the doctor has observed some signs of minor improvement in vein surface visibility (in connection with use of prescription Joust support hose, which costs a lot more than the vitamins do). Vein pain seems to recur consistently if I miss two-three doses in a five-day period.

I also take occasional doses of L-carnitine, which enhances fat metabolism (including, supposedly, the disintegration of plaque deposits in the circulatory system — Lalor reported that megadoses can actually cause the breakup of such deposits in life-threatening form. Whether due to this and the varicose vein regimen or not, I can report that as of my last stress test and test for blockages about four years ago, I had no evidence of same despite my… er, overweight condition (which you noted at Libertycon). I am presently taking one 250-mg tablet per week.

Finally, I take a "balanced B-100" (or two balanced b-50) tablets per day for general energy.

(I’ll also note, however, that I’m on two blood pressure medications and two oral diabetic medications, among other prescriptions for other problems.)

That said, I approach other supplements very carefully after attempting glucosamine- chondroitin in the mid 1990’s. The recommended regimen was five tablets per day; I started at 1 tablet per day and after three days was in severe pain. I chose to drop it completely rather than restarting at the higher dose for obvious reasons.

As always, your mileage may vary. I can only report my anecdotal experience.

Jim

I do not currently take glucosamine-condroitin, but I have done so; I didn’t notice much effect one way or another. I do take a B-100 tablet, generally daily, along with my other witch’s brew.

clip_image003[2]

Jerry,

From time to time you mention actions by the federal government that make it especially difficult for companies like Gibson Guitar to stay in business, and draconian punishments for pet rabbit breeders who sell 600 rabbits instead of the 500 that they are allowed. I understand that the penalty for this particular infraction is a fine of $100,000 rising to $2,000,000 if the fine is not paid promptly. All without the scrutiny of the courts. In the larger scheme of things this is not important. Perfectly good guitars can be imported from China, and no one will really suffer if they are unable to to obtain a pet rabbit. More serious, if true, is the jail sentence of eight years imposed for the crime of importing lobster tails from Honduras in plastic boxes as opposed to cardboard boxes as mandated by the Honduras Government. Again, this is horrific for the imprisoned importer, but not significant in the greater scheme of things.

What is nationally vital is the deterrent effect that these examples have on would be entrepreneurs. There are many reasons for someone who thinks he sees a gap in the market that he can fill to not do so. For the government to add further reasons is not rational, indeed it is clinically insane. The USA has an annual budget deficit of about $15 trillion and unfunded liabilities, eg. pension liabilities, currently estimated at $119 trillion. If these prodigious debts are ever to be repaid, innovators are needed as never before.

Your correspondent’s father rather unwisely toured France and Germany in 1939 in a Fiat 500* car, quite large enough for himself and his pregnant wife. He ended up driving flat out for Calais accompanied by three Brits that he met on the way. For his own part your correspondent would love to visit the USA and spend two or three months just driving about. Starting in New York and ending in Los Angeles before flying the Pacific to see Australasia. The current atmosphere of fascism in the USA has altered his plans. The USA has convinced him that it is a place avoided by the prudent. This is sad to the point of disgust. How did the World’s exemplar of freedom fall, so far, so quickly?

John Edwards.

* The Fiat 500 was large enough for two adults. It also had reasonable space in the back for two legless dwarves who were inured to suffering. How papa fitted three extra adults in the car is a mystery. Possibly the prospect of being a guest of Herr Hitler helped.

We are from the government and we are here to help you.

clip_image002[8]

“It’s practically possible for a medium-technical savvy person to mount an attack and impersonate a plane that’s not there.”

<http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/07/25/next-gen-air-traffic-control-vulnerable-to-hackers-spoofing-planes-out-of-thin-air/>

Roland Dobbins

clip_image002[9]

Neanderthal-type species once roamed Africa, DNA shows,

Jerry

Neanderthal-type species once roamed Africa and interbred with Africans 20-50K ya, after a number of our ancestors had already left and begun to colonize Asia and Europe:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/early-africans-mated-with-mystery-species-of-humans/2012/07/26/gJQAxFzZBX_story.html

“How do you risch?”

Ed

Rishithra—

clip_image002[10]

This is a suprise; audits of the Federal Reserve are supposed to occur annually, but this has not happened since Eisenhower was president.  Every year, Ron Paul introduces certain bills with the purposes of doing what the Consitution and U.S. laws already require and nobody ever votes for these bills.  Auditing the Federal Reserve is one of those bills.  This year, the audit passed!

<.>

In a move that serves as a capstone to Rep. Ron Paul’s colorful career, the House on Wednesday voted to have Congress‘ chief investigators conduct a full audit of the Federal Reserve’s shrouded decision-making process.

The overwhelming 327-98 vote sends the measure to the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, at one time expressed support for an audit — though he reportedly has changed his mind.

</>

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/25/house-passes-ron-pauls-audit-fed-bill/

What is not surprising is the lack of Senate support for this audit.  After all, it’s easier to buy a majority among 100 politicians than it is to buy a majority among 435 politicians. 

More interesting; not suprisng if you keep up on these matters:

<.>

Fed officials have long fought the audit bill, arguing it would compromise their independence. Chairman Ben Bernanke told House lawmakers last week it would open the door to a "nightmare scenario" of political meddling in monetary policy decisions.

</>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/25/us-usa-fed-audit-idUSBRE86O1IX20120725

Why is that Mister Chairman?  What are you doing at the Federal Reserve that you don’t want the people to see?  And, a nightmare for whom, exactly?  Would it be a nightmare for you, past chairmen, past treasurers — to name a few? 

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

clip_image002[11]

clip_image005

clip_image002[12]

Olympic Taurocoprolites; Global Warming pretenders; and other matters.

View 735 Monday, July 30, 2012

clip_image002

I watched the London Olympics Opening Ceremony Friday night, and Saturday I got involved in other stuff. Saturday evening we went to see Brave, and we watched a lot of Olympics stuff Sunday, so in effect I took the weekend off.

I didn’t really want to comment on the Opening Ceremonies because what I would have had to say would be impolite. I’ve thought about it since, and I guess I don’t care. If the Brits can insult Mr. Romney for being both polite and honest when asked if Britain was “ready” for the Olympics – this just after they had to withdraw troops from Afghanistan because they suddenly noted a deficiency in their security arrangements – then I guess being polite isn’t in the cards.

The Opening Ceremony was four hours of the most pretentious taurocoprophogeny I have seen this year. It began with the picture of an idyllic countryside that depicted a nostalgia for a Malthusian existence for 90% of the human race, and went on from there. It included a great Shakespearian actor given about four lines of Shakespeare and dozens of skits in a goofy costume with cigar, interspersed with clever scenes involving the Queen, a paean to National Health Care and socialized medicine, and NBC commenters who made sure that no part of the ceremony was unaccompanied by mindless chatter. Parts of it were amusing, but none of them had much to do with athletic excellence. Mary Poppins vs. Valdemort was funny for a few minutes, and would have been more so if the NBC commenters hadn’t felt the need to explain the matters.

Finally came the parade of the nations, interspersed with the usual horror of stacked commercials which required that the actual events be truncated and hurried along so that there would be more time for advertisements.

After the Berlin Olympics the Games became national contests rather than exhibitions of individual prowess, a tendency exaggerated by the Cold War following WW II. The Los Angeles Olympics tried to reverse some of that trend but it was too late. We now have the idiocy of the gymnastics world champion not being allowed to compete in the individual events because – well because no ‘nation’ can send more than two competitors to an individual contest? I am sure I must be misunderstanding that rule, which seems to take the notion of affirmative action to an absurdity. Such is our modern world.

clip_image002[1]

Roberta tells me it will be 100 degrees out there shortly and we have to take our morning walk. That seems an appropriate setting for thinking about global warming and the surprise defection of Muller from the ranks of the Deniers, accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley.

I haven’t read his (unpublished but peer reviewed, but now said to be on line) papers yet, but the summaries I have seen says that he is now convinced that the world has been warming since 1800, and he can’t think of any reason for that other than human action; and he has a new computer model.

I can’t think of anyone who doesn’t know that the Hudson froze solid in 1776 and continued to do so into the 1800’s, the Thames had markets on the ice up into the 1830’s, the brackish canals of Holland froze solid enough for skating well into late Spring well into the 1800’s. And Arrhenius did back of the envelope calculations – ah well.

I will think on the matter and look at the papers, but I can’t see what Muller knows now than we didn’t all know many years ago. Perhaps he will convince me, but I keep remembering vines in Vinland and dairy farms in Greenland, which I learned about in 5th Grade. Perhaps before.

Back after our walk.

clip_image002[2]

Latch on, New York City!!

clip_image003

NBC appears to be using the airlines and newspapers as role models.  Airlines and newspapers seem to have learned their business philosophy from Chinese merchants: once you have made a sale, gradually reduce the quality of what you deliver until the customer threatens to leave, then go back to giving him the minimum quality that he can still stand.

Newspapers are still reducing their quality, and still losing customers. I already need brighter lights in my breakfast room. NBC is streaming the Americans playing basketball, but their live coverage is some people bicycling. I presume they are racing, but it’s hard to tell.

And the world champion gymnast won’t be allowed to compete in the individual gymnastics because she came in third among Americans, and we are spreading the wealth around: only two competitors per country. This in an event that is said to be related to the original Olympic Games, and supposedly promote individualism as opposed to nationalism – at least that is what they were supposed to be doing when I was growing up. Mr. Hitler tried to make the Games a nationalistic and racial contest, but Jesse Owens did not agree. The Olympic rules forbade ‘professional’ athletes, to the extent that Jim Thorpe’s medals were taken away from him when it was discovered he had played professional baseball before winning the gold) but the problem was that military athletes given the duty of training were permitted. Eventually those rules were abolished, and the Games became even more of a national contest. And now the silly rules say that someone who scores well below world champion Jordyn Wieber can compete, but she can’t. This is stupidity on broken stilts, but it’s good affirmative action I suppose.

 

clip_image003

Of course Mitt Romney was correct. The Brits were not entirely prepared for all this. It was pretty obvious to everyone, but the news media will use any stick to beat him with.

Romney has now in essence said that the US will not only recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (and thus reject Mr. Obama’s suggestion that the Arab-Israeli negotiations begin with the 1967 boundaries (before Israel’s victories in the 6-day and other wars). Sheldon Adelson was in the audience, and is raising money for Romney. There are a number of implications to this. One is that Romney and Newt Gingrich have a powerful mutual friend. What that means for Newt in the event of a Romney election is not clear, but it may indicate a larger place in space policy for Newt Gingrich – who remains a space cadet. I first met Newt after he read my A Step Farther Out (Kindle edition) and telephoned me because he wanted to discuss it.

Sheldon Adelson is a very astute man, and his ability to put together coalitions of enemies in order to advance causes and institutions he favors should not be underestimated. His wife, Dr. Miriam Ochshorn Adelson, is a graduate of Tel Aviv University.

 

clip_image003

And Mike Flynn, who knows more statistics than anyone I have ever known well other than John Tukey, has this comment:

Muller and BEST

A comment on Dr. Briggs’ "Statistician to the Stars" blog provides the following comments from Dr. Muller of the BEST study:

“I was never a skeptic” – Richard Muller, 2011 “If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008 “There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.” – Richard Muller, 2006 “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

Given these sentiments running back to AD 2003, it seems a bit disingenuous to advertise as a "denier" who has been "converted" by close study of the data. If you go to http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5946 and search the site for "Muller" a number of interesting statistical critiques will reveal themselves.

The problem, as always, is in the homogenization procedures. Such procedures are necessary if one is to convert actual temperature measurements into adjusted measurements that "might have been seen" if only there were not a city where once there were meadows as bucolic as the opening act at the Olympics (or conversely, if the city had always been there). This is a bit like measuring a triangular plot of land and finding that the angles do not add up to 180 deg. The data must be adjusted. The question is how. By some amazing coincidence, in 67% of the cases, the adjusted data show a greater temperature increase than the actual data. In some cases, a declining trend in actual temperatures is, mirabile dictu, transformed into an increasing trend in adjusted temperatures. But given the homogenization procedures used, a stationary series of serially correlated random data will be adjusted into an increasing trend. http://itia.ntua.gr/getfile/1212/1/documents/2012EGU_homogenization_1.pdf

MikeF

Apparently Muller wasn’t quite the Denier that the headlines said he was. As to the homogenization, I have written on that many times: I don’t trust any of the measures enough that I would bet trillions of dollars on them. We know it was warmer in Roman times, we know it was warmer in Viking times, and we know damned well that it was a lot colder during the Little Ice Age. We know that it was colder when England and Scandinavia and much of northern North America were under hundreds to thousands of meters of ice. We have some reliable data from the times of the voyage of the Beagle and more since 1900, and after satellites we began to get really accurate primary data, but there are still anomalies, outages, gaps, missing data…

I know it has warmed in North America since Colonial times. I know we were concerned about Cooling when I was science editor of Galaxy. 

clip_image003

My morning paper headlines that 17,000 people have applied for 300 positions as LA City fire fighters. Is it possible that fire fighters are paid more than would be needed to attract qualified people to the job? But then the California board that governs the investment of pension funds has found itself lucky to make 1% return on those funds, but consistently gives the official estimate for future return at more than 7%. This is known as quality management.

 

clip_image002[8]

I cheerfully acknowledge that I paid no attention to Muller until this incident, and I did pay attention to what appeared to be reasonable statements by mainstream media. That, it turns out, was an error. Here is a good summary:

 

Surprise defection of Muller?

The surprise is that anyone believes this is a defection.

First and foremost, look here http://mullerandassociates.com/government/ . This is a company with Richard Muller , President and Chief Scientist, Elizabeth Muller, CEO. They make the following statements (on a page formerly named GreenGov in Oct 2011) "Energy policy involves economics, energy security, and climate change." and "Coal, as one example, is abundant in some countries, but it is also a strong emitter of carbon dioxide." They made those same statements before this paper was first submitted (2011), and thus supposedly before Muller was "convinced" by the data that humans changed climate. They therefore state that they believe in climate change caused by human produced CO2, and so stated at the same time they were claiming to be "skeptics". They get business and money if climate change is true, and lose money if it is false. They therefore have a serious conflict of interest. Conclusion, they were not at that time and never have been, "skeptics".

Muller enlisted some skeptics and middle of the roaders such as Anthony Watts and Dr. Judith Curry (listed co author), and then released a paper that was different that these people were told it would be, not using their data or input in ways he stated that he would. This was then followed by a media blitz in Oct 2011 which drew criticism from these contributors and co authors since it was released before peer review. This looks like simply getting the "skeptics" on board, or at least getting their names on the paper, to make it look as if Muller is a skeptic or at least is addressing their concerns. It was this first media blitz that claimed that Muller was now no longer a "skeptic" and was convinced by the data that humans changed climate. With the discovery of the above Muller and Associates statement that climate change is true prior to and during his claim of being a "skeptic", it is obvious that that claim was and is false. It looks like a classic "Black Flag" operation, claim to be one thing while actually being another. It is the old tactic "Ally, Neutralize, Destroy", Ally = "I am a fellow skeptic, like you", Neutralize = "Oh look, that data says humans are causing warming", Destroy = "If even I, a fellow skeptic, can see this, you skeptics should give up your skepticism and join the consensus".

This paper has still NOT passed peer review, in fact, at least one of the reviewers, Ross McKitrick, has recommended it not be published, stating "I submitted my review just before the end of September 2011, outlining what I saw were serious shortcomings in their methods and arguing that their analysis does not establish valid grounds for the conclusions they assert. I suggested the authors be asked to undertake a major revision." and then " On March 8 2012 I was asked by JGR to review a revised version of the Wickham et al. paper. I submitted my review at the end of March. The authors had made very few changes and had not addressed any of the methodological problems, so I recommended the paper not be published. I do not know what the journal’s decision was, but it is 4 months later and I can find no evidence on the BEST website that this or any other BEST project paper has been accepted for publication." http://www.rossmckitrick.com/

Listed co author Dr. Judith Curry states "Muller bases his ‘conversion’ on the results of their recent paper. So, how convincing is the analysis in Rohde et al.’s new paper?" followed by "I have made public statements that I am unconvinced by their analysis". http://judithcurry.com/2012/07/30/observation-based-attribution/#more-9238

Meanwhile, there is now evidence that "the data used by Muller to draw these conclusions was unreliable to the point of utter uselessness" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100173174/global-warming-yeah-right/ . This is based on new findings that half of the US temperature change in the last 30 years is caused by bad station siting http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-dismantles-muller-s-best-claims-half-the-warming-trend-artificial . You can see actual photographs of this bad station siting here http://www.surfacestations.org/ , no need to just take their word for it (suggest you look there during off peak hours, traffic has become heavy). Basically, fully 80% of the sites used to take the "official" temperature in the US are stated by the NOAA to be too poorly sited to be used officially, but are used anyway. Most of these sites have serious Urban Heat Island effects causing an artificially high temperature to be registered, these bad readings are then used to "adjust" the data even on well sited stations upwards. The temperatures you have been told about are therefor simply false. The problem will be even worse in other countries where there is even less quality control, and often few stations with temperatures of huge areas of the earth being measured at only a few (usually urban) stations (Siberia for instance). Half of all "official" "world average" temperatures are measured at airports, covered in miles of concrete and of course of necessity being near urban areas, usually surrounded by them Actual paper on this here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al_2012_discussion_paper_webrelease.pdf (PDF), powerpoint overview here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al-station-siting-7-29-12.ppt .

Conclusions:

Richard Muller is not now, and never was, a skeptic, as proven by his companies website.

His "defection" is therefor staged.

"Accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley", mission accomplished.

His paper is stated to be flawed by it’s co author and some of it’s contributors, as well as others.

It has NOT been recommended for publication by peer review, nor has it been published.

Recent studies now show it to be based on flawed data anyway, in addition to the flawed methodology.

Even with all that, Mullers paper shows that over the last 15+ years, CO2 has increased but the temperature has not.

Legatus

Which confirms what we have actually long known about the True Believers in the Global Warming program. Sorry to have wasted so much time on this, but I had mail from a number of you asking about it – apparently the ploy worked well, and got the attention that Muller wanted. No surprises there. And the example confirms what we have known about the Believers for some time.

My thanks to all of you who have taken the trouble to chase this down.

clip_image002[9]

I meant to comment on this earlier.

drought 

Hi Jerry,

The latest hyperventilating on the TV news is about the threat of rising food prices because of the drought, particularly grains and meat.

Perhaps right now isn’t the best time to be burning food (ethanol) in our cars? If Obama can suspend the welfare work requirements (in violation of the black letter of the law), maybe he can suspend the ethanol mandates for a legitimate crisis?

Needless to say, I’m not holding my breath.

Cheers,

Doug=

That was the first thing I thought of after watching a news report on the drought and the coming corn shortage. Burning food is sinful, and a President who orders us to burn food in cars rather than drill for more oil does not have the best interests of the people who have to buy their food as his major goal. When the United States was booming, we could afford this kind of nonsense although I can think of more fun things to waste money on; but in this economy driving up the price of fuel by burning corn while preventing drilling is much worse than a blunder. Yet we continue to do it. As we continue to fund all kinds of nonsense that costs money.

The best thing one can do for giant corporations is to thicken the business environment with regulations requiring compliance specialists; the result is to prevent newcomers from entering the business, thus ensuring that the business will be dominated by the existing giants. We have always known this, and the Republicans know it as well as the Democrats. This regulatory environment has grown ever more complex under each party, but since the unionized public employees tend to vote Democrat it is harder for Democrat leaders to cut back regulations than it is for Republicans. The only remedy to these trends is for the American Middle Class to understand that self government requires that some citizens be willing to be part of the self government, and for others to become part of the governing structure of one of the major parties. Ideally both would be dominated by middle class citizens, as they were at one time. One problem is that we now live in an era in which fami9lies require two incomes. At one time one member of a family would work and the other might have the leisure to participate in politics, at least at a local level. Now that women are liberated and thus have to work it is much harder for the middle class to take part in self government. More on this another time.

We will see rising food prices and we will continue to see the Federal Government requiring us to convert food into automobile fuel at costs higher than the stuff can be sold for without subsidies. The subsidies keep the whole industry going – it would collapse without them, and food would be sold as food in the open market.

And they never catch wise…

clip_image002[9]

I am not a regular reader of Slate and I know no more about this than having read it: but it is disturbing.

Nonetheless, the goal of the “stakeholder engagement event,” as the TPP “Welcome Stakeholders!” packet explained, was to provide an “open and productive forum.” Yet the public knows more about the aggregate numbers of nuclear warheads the United States and Russia have deployed on intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty than it does about U.S. negotiating positions in TPP. Thus, on “openness,” the TPP negotiators and USTR have failed.

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/07/trans_pacific_partnership_agreement_tpp_could_radically_alter_intellectual_property_law.html

 

clip_image002[9]

clip_image004

clip_image002[9]