Ramblings on a Sunday; Curiosity on Mars

View 736 Sunday, August 05, 2012

clip_image002

Something today reminded me:

The Servant When He Reigneth

"For three things the earth is disquieted, and for four which it cannot bear. For a servant when he reigneth, and a fool when he is filled with meat; for an odious woman when she is married, and an handmaid that is heir to her mistress." — PROV. XXX. 21-22-23.

Three things make earth unquiet
And four she cannot brook
The godly Agur counted them
And put them in a book —
Those Four Tremendous Curses
With which mankind is cursed;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Old Agur entered first.
An Handmaid that is Mistress
We need not call upon.
A Fool when he is full of Meat
Will fall asleep anon.
An Odious Woman Married
May bear a babe and mend;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Is Confusion to the end.

His feet are swift to tumult,
His hands are slow to toil,
His ears are deaf to reason,
His lips are loud in broil.
He knows no use for power
Except to show his might.
He gives no heed to judgment
Unless it prove him right.

Because he served a master
Before his Kingship came,
And hid in all disaster
Behind his master’s name,
So, when his Folly opens
The unnecessary hells,
A Servant when He Reigneth
Throws the blame on some one else.

His vows are lightly spoken,
His faith is hard to bind,
His trust is easy broken,
He fears his fellow-kind.
The nearest mob will move him
To break the pledge he gave —
Oh, a Servant when he Reigneth
Is more than ever slave!

Rudyard Kipling

Of course no one says such things now. Perhaps we have evidence that they are not true as we once thought? Or perhaps they used to be true but are no longer?

clip_image002[1]

I hold no real brief for the Mamalukes – the Military officers who formerly ruled Egypt – but I am not at all certain that rule by those who have the means to sieze and hold the public square in Cairo is preferable, and I am fairly certain that the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood is not a step towards progress. Mr. Romney has said that a major difference between Palestinians and Israelis is cultural. Martin Peretz, former owner of New Republic, said recently “Mitt Romney was said to have made an enormous faux pas when he said that,” but “I have no great anticipations in the Morsi government because it seems to me the Muslim Brotherhood’s program in its essentials will not alter the social rules of Arab societies. That is, if you expect that in two years someone will be able to say that what Romney said is not true, you will be bitterly disappointed.”

Today I heard a radio bulletin that there have been heavy casualties in the border area where Gaza, Israel, and Egypt come together. This can hardly be a surprise.

The US abandoned Miubarek, a long time ally and keeper of the peace. I expect most of my readers will be too young to remember the seemingly endless wars of 1948, 1956, 1967, 1969, 1973, as well as hundreds of incidents. Then in 1979 Egypt recognized Israel and made peace. It was an uneasy peace, and committed the US to pay heavy tribute to help preserve it, but it was a form of peace. The Muslim Brotherhood apparently does not recognize the right of Israel to exist.

Democracy in Egypt cannot easily be defined. It is not clear what will come in Tunisia. It is less clear what will be the future of Libya. Syria is in turmoil but we don’t know much about the rebel factions.

clip_image003

clip_image003[1]

A source has told me that Harry Reid is a pederast. Of course sources have told me that Newt Gingrich is an alien, that President Obama was not born in the United States, that a secret unit at Wright Patterson Air Force Base has a secret vault containing wreckage and bodies from crashed alien spacecraft – apparently multiples!. Harry Reid says that sources have told him that Mitt Romney has not paid his taxed in ten years. Sources have told me that Roosevelt deliberately provoked the Japanese into attacking the United States but Roosevelt did not expect it to be at Pearl Harbor. Sources close to Admiral Kimmel have told me that Roosevelt knew precisely when the attack on Pearl Harbor was coming, but did not warn Kimmel. Sources have told me that – but surely the point is made. There is probably no story so improbable that someone will not tell it to someone else as an anonymous source. Of course some improbable stories are true, even if they surface in the silly season during an election campaign.

clip_image002[2]

Facebook stock continued to fall. When it first came out I guessed that the stock would fall until its Price to Earnings ratio fell below the P/E for Apple and Google. P/E is not an exact estimate – particularly since estimating future earnings for any of those companies is not all that accurate a process and involves a good bit of guesswork – but it is an estimate of what “the market” thinks of the growth potential of the company. A very high P/E says that the company has very high growth expectations. The objective evidence for the growth potential of Facebook being that much higher than Apple has always been lacking. I leave conclusions as an exercise for the reader.

Looking at fundamentals, Google clearly had a far more modest valuation than Facebook’s. For the two reported financial quarters that ended June 30, 2004, Google earned $143 million on sales of $1.35 billion. Doubling those numbers for an annualized figure, you get $286 million net income on $2.7 billion in revenue. That would have given Google a price-earnings ratio of 80.5, and a price-to-sales ratio of 8.5.

Those are not lean numbers in and of themselves, but when you consider how fast Google was growing its top line, they were not ludicrously in the stratosphere. Revenue surged 234% in 2003 from 2002, and was still jumping 162% and 125% in the first and second quarters of 2004, respectively. Those are the kinds of growth rates that make an 80 P/E palatable.

Now take a look at Facebook’s last two quarterly income statements. For the final quarter of 2011 and the first one of 2012, Mark Zuckerberg and his crew earned net income of $507 million on revenue of $2.19 billion. Annualized, you get $1.14 billion profit on $4.38 billion in sales. That’s a profit margin of 26%, blowing away Google’s of less than 10% for the first six months of 2004 when it was still private.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johndobosz/2012/05/17/facebook-is-flat-out-expensive-compared-to-google-at-ipo/

I note that there seem to be few recent analyses of Facebook P/E.

clip_image002[3]

Curiosity has landed on Mars. It appears to have been a nominal mission. Of course it had to be – that is, there’s no such thing as a small failure in an operation like this. It all has to go right or nothing does. Cal Tech/JPL/NASA have brought it off and deserve the praise they will now get. And that’s really all we are going to know until the dust covers come off the cameras, and all the cameras – I believe there are seventeen of them – are in operation. We have every reason to expect all that to work properly. The existence of the blurred black and whites taken through the dust covers shows that the relay linkages are all working, the Deep Space Network is working, the power sources on both Curiosity and the orbiter are in order, and all the pieces are talking to each other.

The mission cost several billion dollars.The photographs and other data will be streaming in for days, weeks, months, probably years. It was worth it. We will learn a lot from that.

Having said that, I will add that I would not make Mars exploration the next high priority space event. I still believe that the next step in space exploration ought to be a permanent Lunar Base. We have to learn to live in space and exploit space resources, and the Moon is the logical next step. It has resources, nowhere near those of Mars, but extensive, and the Moon is comparatively easy to get to. A Moon base can be supported from Earth when we inevitably discover that we forgot to bring along something that we need for life. But that’s another discussion for another time. For now it’s enough to congratulate the Curiosity team, and shout loud huzzahs.

clip_image002[4]

marvin (2)

clip_image002[5]

clip_image002[6]

clip_image002[7]

clip_image003[2]

clip_image003[3]

clip_image003[4]

clip_image005

clip_image003[5]

The Hershey Puzzle continues; possible lawsuit?

View 735 Friday, August 03, 2012

It’s time for my walk, but I have this:

Government seizure of children

Jerry:

Perhaps I can add to your recently acquired knowledge of Dr. Michael Farris by pointing you to some resources. Briefly, Dr. Farris is one of God’s gifts to American parents in this century.

You frequently comment on the disaster of government schooling, as well you should, for it is leading us into the new dark age you often mention. In response to that disaster, Michael Farris was a pioneer in the home schooling movement.

Dr. Farris was a founder and is now chairman and general counsel of the Home School Legal Defense Association. He is also founding president and now chancellor of Patrick Henry College in Virginia. In his spare time, between writing more than a dozen books on history, constitutional law, and education, he wrote 3 novels.

"Education Week" named Dr. Farris one of the "Top 100 Faces in Education of the 20th Century." The Heritage Foundation awarded him its Salvatori Award for American Citizenship.

As for the Home School Legal Defense Association, anyone doing home schooling should be a member of HSLDA for the protection of their children and their rights as parents. HSLDA stands in the doorway between you and the cops and social workers who come to seize your children and grandchildren.

You can learn more about HSLDA at

http://www.hslda.org/

Dr. Farris’s work as an attorney with HSLDA is described at http://www.hslda.org/about/staff/attorneys/Farris.asp

His position at Patrick Henry College is described at http://www.phc.edu/chancellor_main.php

He introduces a 25-part course on America’s constitution at http://www.constitutionreclaimed.com/

As for the incident in State College that caught your attention, you should not be surprised. It is not surprising that the child was taken by the government. Neither is it surprising that the "mainstream media" ignored the incident. The government works hard every day to seize both physical and mental control of America’s children. The battle has escalated as the United Nations seeks even greater control. For an introduction to that issue, see http://www.parentalrights.org/

Best regards,

–Harry M.

Which is good credential presentation but still doesn’t give me the details of what really happened in the State College, Pennsylvania hospital incident, and I am still puzzled as to why a flock of hungry lawyers have not descended on the town: a mother separated from her child by force, forced to sleep in a parking lot and called in at intervals to breast feed her newborn: it is a story most journalists would kill for, and when I thought I was going to be a lawyer I would have prayed for the opportunity to plead such a case. Against a Penn State institution! At this time!

But I Google in vain. And that is puzzling. We have a clear case of kidnapping, abuse of authority, incompetence, malfeasance – perhaps the Attorney General of the United States is suppressing the investigation?

For those who don’t know what this is about, https://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/?p=8831. The story is horrifying. And there seems to be no national reaction to it. And I remain puzzled.

clip_image002

It is time for my morning walk. More on this later. I do not doubt the arrogant incompetence of bureaucrats in some institutions. Fortunately my medical experiences have been with Kaiser and I cannot remember one made unpleasant by the people there (there is nothing pleasant about having brain cancer, but that’s not Kaiser’s fault). But I cannot fathom why a story of this magnitude is ignored by all the free lance reporters in the area. Is there some judicial gag order?

clip_image003

NASA SELECTS SPACEX TO RETURN AMERICANS TO SPACE

Notice the budget, 440 million. NASA eats that much money in meetings every year. I’m sure they are still expending millions on getting the rocket to nowhere going. Never the less, Space X got the contract. Go DD Harriman.

Phil

Begin forwarded message:

From: "SpaceX" <emily@spacex.com>

Subject: NASA SELECTS SPACEX TO RETURN AMERICANS TO SPACE

Date: August 3, 2012 10:40:18 AM PDT

To: <ptharp@vreelin.com>

<https://staticapp.icpsc.com/icp/loadimage.php/mogile/746865/7536220a9d41b0a837a27eb049f22d36/image/png>

NASA SELECTS SPACEX TO RETURN AMERICANS TO SPACE

(Hawthorne, CA) – Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) today won a $440 million contract with NASA to develop the successor to the Space Shuttle and transport American astronauts into space.

“This is a decisive milestone in human spaceflight and sets an exciting course for the next phase of American space exploration,” said SpaceX CEO and Chief Designer Elon Musk. “SpaceX, along with our partners at NASA, will continue to push the boundaries of space technology to develop the safest, most advanced crew vehicle ever flown.”

SpaceX expects to undertake its first manned flight by 2015 – a timetable that capitalizes on the proven success of the company’s Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft combination. While Dragon is initially being used to transport cargo to the International Space Station, both Dragon and Falcon 9 were designed from the beginning to carry crew.

Under the Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCap) initiative’s base period, SpaceX will make the final modifications necessary to prepare Dragon to safely transport astronauts into space. These include:

******Seats for seven astronauts.

******The most technically advanced launch escape system ever developed, with powered abort possibilities from launch pad to orbit. SpaceX will demonstrate that Dragon will be able to escape a launch-pad emergency by firing integrated SuperDraco engines to carry the spacecraft safely to the ocean. SpaceX will also conduct an in-flight abort test that allows Dragon to escape at the moment of maximum aerodynamic drag, again by firing the SuperDraco thrusters to carry the spacecraft a safe distance from the rocket.

******A breakthrough propulsive landing system for gentle ground touchdowns on legs.

******Refinements and rigorous testing of essential aspects of Dragon’s design, including life-support systems and an advanced cockpit design complete with modern human interfaces.

SpaceX will perform stringent safety and mission-assurance analyses to demonstrate that all these systems meet NASA requirements.

With a minimal number of stage separations, all-liquid rocket engines that can be throttled and turned off in an emergency, engine-out capability during ascent, and powered abort capability all the way to orbit, the Falcon 9-Dragon combination will be the safest spacecraft ever developed.

About SpaceX

SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. With a diverse manifest of more than 40 launches to resupply the space station and deliver commercial and government satellites to orbit, SpaceX is the world’s fastest growing launch services provider. In 2012, SpaceX made history when its Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial vehicle to successfully attach to the International Space Station—a feat previously achieved by only four governments. With the retirement of the Space Shuttle, the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft are carrying cargo, and one day will carry astronauts, to and from the space station for NASA. Founded in 2002 by Elon Musk, SpaceX is a private company owned by management and employees, with minority investments from Founders Fund, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, and Valor Equity Partners. The company has more than 1,800 employees in California, Texas, Florida and Washington, DC. For more information, visit www.spacex.com.

<http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=12851859&msgid=211577&act=2CFY&c=746865&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FMZJk4CrxctQ>

PHOTOGRAPHY: http://spacexlaunch.zenfolio.com/p70000514 <http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=12851859&msgid=211577&act=2CFY&c=746865&destination=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.spacex.com%2Fowa%2Fredir.aspx%3FC%3Dc75b9afceae14333a6086d27e0006bbc%26URL%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fspacexlaunch.zenfolio.com%252fp70000514>

<http://www.spacex.com/assets/img/20120803/image006.jpg> <http://www.spacex.com/assets/img/20120803/image007.jpg>

The Man Who Sold The Moon? $440 million? We live in interesting times.

 

clip_image003[1]

Docket Listing for Civil Rights Suit in PA Baby Case

Jerry –

This might be of some interest:

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/pennsylvania/pamdce/1:2012cv00442/88588/

It lists details about a suit filed in Pennsylvania Middle District Court, Harrisburg – Plaintiffs Scott and Jodi Ferris, Defendants Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Caitlin J. Mallis, M.D., Ian M. Paul, M.D., John Doe, M.D., Janet Doe, R.N., John Roe, Jane Roe, Janet Roe, Jack Roe, Officer Rian Bell, Officer Jake Roe, Angelica Lopez-Heagy , Dauphin County Social Services for Children and Youth and Jane Doe, R.N.

Filed March 9 of this year.

Don’t know whether justia.com is a reliable source, but it does offer what might be an indication other than Michael Farris’ request for donations that Scott and Jodi ?Ferris exist and are involved in a dust-up with Milton S. Hershey Medical Center et al.

David Smith

Interesting. Indeed. So one wonders, why is there not more attention to this? Why is Chick Fil A or however you spell it of more interest than what is described as a plain case of assault, abuse of authority, and kidnapping? If the accounts we have of the incident are accurate, this is a horror story. Perhaps the trial, if it ever happens, will bring out more information. Or perhaps the suit will be bought off for money in exchange for silence.

clip_image003[2]

One reason I don’t Tweet: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/08/02/new-facebook-tool-may-turn-friends-into-enemies-for-democratic-cause/ 

I suppose I will have to join the 21st Century and create some kind of Facebook page to which I can upload pictures once in a while, but I have to say I don’t really know anyone whose tweets I would care to follow. I may be mistaken on that, but when I want short observations from people I respect I go look at Glenn Reynolds Instapundit.  I so no reason to follow him on Tweet, although I probably would have liked to know he was going to be at a party I attended in Chattanooga last month. I had a pleasant conversation with Glenn and his wife, but had I known he would be there I would have arranged to stay longer. In any event, I am contemplating a Facebook page (I understand there may be one with my name on it put up by friends, but I have never seen it since I don’t have a Facebook account). I don’t think I contemplate Tweeting.

clip_image002[1]

The Chick Fil A story continues. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/03/viral-video-man-picking-on-chick-fil-worker-gets-him-fired/ shows the viral video of the onetime college professor and CFO of a medical manufacturing company who decided to drive in to a Chick  Fil A and get a free water, and while he was at it, harangue a very cool young lady employee working at the drive in food service window. He got his free water and did not cause Rachel to lose her cool. The result will probably be a promotion for Rachel and has apparently resulted in his dismissal as CFO. Sic transit gloria mundi.

clip_image002[2]

clip_image002[3]

clip_image002[4]

clip_image002[5]

clip_image002[6]

clip_image002[7]

clip_image002[8]

clip_image005

clip_image002[9]

Horror in Hershey? Teach your kids to read. And some thoughts on legitimacy in government.

View 735 Thursday, August 02, 2012

I’ve been working on fiction for the last couple of days. I even took a few hours off for social activities. And it’s very hot in Los Angeles.

clip_image002

I have no knowledge of this incident other than various repetitions of the story originally posted in a fundraising appeal by the Home Schooling Defense Association, an organization I am not familiar with. The story is so horrifying that I would have thought it would be all over the news by now, with every major network – and certainly Fox and Newscorp – sending teams of reporters, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania sending in a team of investigators looking for corroboration leading to changes of kidnapping, assault, perjury, malfeasance in office, and various criminal offenses on the part of both lay and medical bureaucrats in the “Hershey Medical Center—a state-affiliated hospital in Pennsylvania.” I put that in quotes because there are at least two Hersey Medical Centers in Pennsylvania. One is the expected center in Hersey, PA (expected because Hersey has a long history of providing for the residents of Hersey) but I would not have thought that a state-affiliated hospital; and the other a state facility in State College, PA.

The HSLDA story told by its chairman Michael P. Farris, Esq. does not identify which. Of course Mr. Farris is a lawyer and institution chairman, not a reporter; but still, you would think that this would be an important detail.

The story is told in some detail under the title Newborn Seized in Hospital by Police, Social Worker

http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/pa/201203270.asp.

It is truly horrifying, and as I said, it is a story that one would think would be all over the headlines of every paper in the country. In my search for some details not given in the story – such as where the hospital is, and some of the names of people involved – I found numerous web sites I have never visited before telling the story, but they were all repetitions – some with emotional enhancements – of Mr. Farris’s story, and none told me more than he had.

I first heard of this story in email from a friend and frequent correspondent pointing me to http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/mom-booted-from-hospital-as-baby-snatched/ on the WND website, another with which I have no familiarity.

My problem here is that what is alleged is horrifying and should be told widely: but I can’t find any account of it other than repetitions of the original post in Mr. Farris’ fundraising appeal, and while I have absolutely no evidence that Mr. Farris is not scrupulously correct in his account, it is clear that he was not a witness, and he gives no sources.

If any substantial part of this story is true, then we can expect to see criminal arrests in either Hersey, PA or State College, PA, and some attention paid to the matter, and I can add this to my examples of the workings of the Iron Law of Bureaucracy.

I have now found this: http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/03/williamstown_couple_sues_penn.html which establishes that this was the Penn State facility at State College, and gives the names of the parents and the judge who returned their child to their custody, so apparently at least some of this horrifying story is based on facts. Whether the location in State College PA has any bearing I can’t determine, but it wasn’t the town of Hersey. Penn State is much more interested in football than chocolate.

= = = =

Alert. The following is an advertisement.

I note that this involves home schooling. The most important thing schools can teach the young in the Unites States is to teach them to read. Most don’t. If your school talks about ‘reading at grade level’ they are not really teaching the kids to read. Find out more at http://www.readingtlc.com/ which is the home ground of Mrs. Pournelle’s reading program. It’s old, it’s hokey, and it just plain works.

clip_image002[1]

Subject: Metformin, B-12 and calcium

Jerry, one of your correspondents reports that the metformin she takes is depleting her B-12 and calcium. I’m very sorry to read that, but I’d like to point out that although metformin certainly can have that effect, it doesn’t always, or even usually. How do I know? Well, I’ve been taking it for about a decade now. As you know, I’ve also been hospitalized twice with ITP, resulting from a dangerously-low platelet count and one of the things your body uses B-12 for is building platelets. On two separate occasions, I’ve asked my hematologist (As chance would have it, I got lucky and was assigned to the head of the department at the West LA VA Hospital.) if this might be a factor and both times he assured me that it wasn’t. Yes, there’s no doubt that it can happen, but I didn’t want all of your readers who are taking metformin to be unduly worried.

I have taken metformin for about ten years myself, and I have had no problems. I do sometimes take a B-100 when I think of it, but that’s not part of my usual witch’s brew. On the gripping hand I do take a broad spectrum of vitamin and mineral supplements, most of them undoubtedly making expensive urine and making my kidneys work a bit harder, but something seems to be keeping m going at my age.

I have taken metformin for more than a decade. I continue to take the recommended dosage, and my sugar is reasonably well under control: I do eat lots of salads, and we walk a mile every other day.

clip_image003

Thinking about Syria

I am preparing a short piece on US interests and options in Syria, and by extension, the Middle East, Arab Spring, Moscow Spring, and the general unrest in the world. I don’t call it an essay because I am not sure I will have any conclusions. The problem with the world is that we no longer have any agreement – anywhere – on just what is legitimacy in government. The US principle is that: All men are created equal. They are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. Among these rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the latter of which is interpreted as a right to security in their property. To secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the government.

Legitimate government, then, is government by consent of the governed, and all of politics is just a means for discerning what is the consent of the governed.

What happens when the governed do not all consent to the same thing? As for example, if some part of the population is considered unequal and not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? This was the basis of the principle constitutional crisis of the United States from its beginning, through the Civil War, and into modern times. There is no agreement on just what ‘Created Equal’ means, and particularly when we are also told that among our rights is the right to reject the very notion of a Creator and the right to forbid the majority of the governed from exhibiting religious symbols such as the Ten Commandments at Courthouses, or crèches and menorahs in the public parks, or opening public ceremonies with an Invocation and closing them with some form of Benediction. If we reject the Creator we are thrown upon science to determine what “created equal” means, and science is a weak reed indeed for supporting that proposition. After all, we are shown every night on television men and women doing things few of us aspire to, and very graphically demonstrating that we are not their equals. We see television shows demonstrating that some people appear to be more intelligent than the rest of us. We all grew up on stories about heroes, and our comic books don’t even pretend to equality. What does it mean, equal?

And just who are the governed, and how do we measure their consent? We don’t allow children under age 18 to vote, and when I was young that age was 21, although the age of military service was 18, or 17 with parental consent or with the willing collusion of a recruiting sergeant. There were good reasons for limiting the voting age to 21, and there are still good reasons for not lowering it to, say, 14 which is when young Roman boys were subject to conscription.

In a reasonably homogeneous society it might make sense to take a majority vote and call that ‘consent of the governed’. Give that society enough diversity and the situation changes. If we take a vote among chickens and foxes as to which shall be dinner for the other, the loser is unlikely to believe that this is a valid procedure. The chickens will appeal to the farmer, who will drive away the foxes, and the chickens can now appeal to the good will and self interest of their protector to keep them for their eggs at least until they are beyond egg-laying age.

Similar arguments have been made by Civil Rights groups for centuries. Tennessee had fair elections before and after the Civil War, but it had legal segregation when I was growing up. We were taught the principle of consent of the governed in US history in grade school, and we all – well, all of us in the white classrooms – saw no conflict of principle.

Pass now to the Middle East, where there are racial, tribal, religious, and religious sectarian differences that make the legally segregated South of my youth look like a vary good deal for minority and majority alike. In Syria, an Arab tribe called the Alawi have long been a warrior caste – when the French governed Syria under mandate they recruited soldiers largely from the Alawi minority, and the fierce fighting ability of the Alawites is mentioned in accounts written during the Crusades – and the Alawi have been the traditional governing class. The Alawi are Shiite, and some Shiite scholars consider them heretics; and of course the Sunni majority of Syria consider them heretics because they aren’t Sunni. As to the Sunni, the Saudi royal family has long made alliance with the Wahabi who insist on strict adherence to Islamic law. That includes levying tribute on Christians and Jews.

Much of the support for the Syrian rebels comes from Saudi Arabia, and with that aid come some Wahabi clerics. Al Qaeda is strictly Sunni Muslim.

The Alawi government, being a minority itself, traditionally had more tolerance for Christian, Jews, animists (not many of those in Syria), atheists and general secularism than do either their Wahabi enemies or their Shiite Iranian allies and supporters.

There were similar differences in Egypt, and after Egypt fell to 100,000 demonstrators who convinced the world that the Egyptian Army did not have the consent of the governed, the ancient Christian communities in Egypt were under attack. The Christian have not consented to be persecuted. The Army used to protect them.

There are similar stories in other parts of the world. It is clear that Russia has no concept of what a legitimate government might be. Communism under Gorbachev? When the old line communists tried to overthrow Gorbachev, the result was Yeltsin. Under Yeltsin the corruption increased to spectacular levels, so much so that it horrified the KGB, who promised to end much of the corruption. Enter Putin. What is not seen here is any concept of what would legitimize government in Russia. Return of the Tsar?

The appeal of Monarchy is that the monarch is supposed to protect everyone. The price of monarchy is that there is no pretense of equality.

We can be sure that a majority vote among illiterates will not make for a very effective government. Or will it? And is it legitimate? At one time legitimacy had to do with who had hereditary rights. We have scrapped that in the United States, and we now seem to think that only a plebiscite can legitimize a government. The problem is that a plebiscite may incite the winner to finish off a minority. Particularly in cases such as the Kurds of Iraq, or the Alawi of Syria.

More on this later; for now I leave for lunch, and you can contemplate – just what would legitimize governments in: Iran. Iraq. Egypt. Libya. Tunisia. Morocco. Chad. Arabia. Qatar. Kuwait where American guns restored the Royal Family which spent the First Gulf War in London casinos. Bosnia. Serbia. Croatia. Pakistan. Uzbekistan. I could continue.

And not all that long ago the neocons were talking about the end of history.

clip_image003[1]

I am going to have lunch now.

clip_image002[2]

Sir John Keegan, RIP

Thought you would want to know, since many of his books made it into your recommendation lists over the years:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/culture-obituaries/books-obituaries/9447744/Sir-John-Keegan.html

Lawrence Person

I have indeed recommended his books over the years. RIP

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

Olympic Taurocoprolites; Global Warming pretenders; and other matters.

View 735 Monday, July 30, 2012

clip_image002

I watched the London Olympics Opening Ceremony Friday night, and Saturday I got involved in other stuff. Saturday evening we went to see Brave, and we watched a lot of Olympics stuff Sunday, so in effect I took the weekend off.

I didn’t really want to comment on the Opening Ceremonies because what I would have had to say would be impolite. I’ve thought about it since, and I guess I don’t care. If the Brits can insult Mr. Romney for being both polite and honest when asked if Britain was “ready” for the Olympics – this just after they had to withdraw troops from Afghanistan because they suddenly noted a deficiency in their security arrangements – then I guess being polite isn’t in the cards.

The Opening Ceremony was four hours of the most pretentious taurocoprophogeny I have seen this year. It began with the picture of an idyllic countryside that depicted a nostalgia for a Malthusian existence for 90% of the human race, and went on from there. It included a great Shakespearian actor given about four lines of Shakespeare and dozens of skits in a goofy costume with cigar, interspersed with clever scenes involving the Queen, a paean to National Health Care and socialized medicine, and NBC commenters who made sure that no part of the ceremony was unaccompanied by mindless chatter. Parts of it were amusing, but none of them had much to do with athletic excellence. Mary Poppins vs. Valdemort was funny for a few minutes, and would have been more so if the NBC commenters hadn’t felt the need to explain the matters.

Finally came the parade of the nations, interspersed with the usual horror of stacked commercials which required that the actual events be truncated and hurried along so that there would be more time for advertisements.

After the Berlin Olympics the Games became national contests rather than exhibitions of individual prowess, a tendency exaggerated by the Cold War following WW II. The Los Angeles Olympics tried to reverse some of that trend but it was too late. We now have the idiocy of the gymnastics world champion not being allowed to compete in the individual events because – well because no ‘nation’ can send more than two competitors to an individual contest? I am sure I must be misunderstanding that rule, which seems to take the notion of affirmative action to an absurdity. Such is our modern world.

clip_image002[1]

Roberta tells me it will be 100 degrees out there shortly and we have to take our morning walk. That seems an appropriate setting for thinking about global warming and the surprise defection of Muller from the ranks of the Deniers, accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley.

I haven’t read his (unpublished but peer reviewed, but now said to be on line) papers yet, but the summaries I have seen says that he is now convinced that the world has been warming since 1800, and he can’t think of any reason for that other than human action; and he has a new computer model.

I can’t think of anyone who doesn’t know that the Hudson froze solid in 1776 and continued to do so into the 1800’s, the Thames had markets on the ice up into the 1830’s, the brackish canals of Holland froze solid enough for skating well into late Spring well into the 1800’s. And Arrhenius did back of the envelope calculations – ah well.

I will think on the matter and look at the papers, but I can’t see what Muller knows now than we didn’t all know many years ago. Perhaps he will convince me, but I keep remembering vines in Vinland and dairy farms in Greenland, which I learned about in 5th Grade. Perhaps before.

Back after our walk.

clip_image002[2]

Latch on, New York City!!

clip_image003

NBC appears to be using the airlines and newspapers as role models.  Airlines and newspapers seem to have learned their business philosophy from Chinese merchants: once you have made a sale, gradually reduce the quality of what you deliver until the customer threatens to leave, then go back to giving him the minimum quality that he can still stand.

Newspapers are still reducing their quality, and still losing customers. I already need brighter lights in my breakfast room. NBC is streaming the Americans playing basketball, but their live coverage is some people bicycling. I presume they are racing, but it’s hard to tell.

And the world champion gymnast won’t be allowed to compete in the individual gymnastics because she came in third among Americans, and we are spreading the wealth around: only two competitors per country. This in an event that is said to be related to the original Olympic Games, and supposedly promote individualism as opposed to nationalism – at least that is what they were supposed to be doing when I was growing up. Mr. Hitler tried to make the Games a nationalistic and racial contest, but Jesse Owens did not agree. The Olympic rules forbade ‘professional’ athletes, to the extent that Jim Thorpe’s medals were taken away from him when it was discovered he had played professional baseball before winning the gold) but the problem was that military athletes given the duty of training were permitted. Eventually those rules were abolished, and the Games became even more of a national contest. And now the silly rules say that someone who scores well below world champion Jordyn Wieber can compete, but she can’t. This is stupidity on broken stilts, but it’s good affirmative action I suppose.

 

clip_image003

Of course Mitt Romney was correct. The Brits were not entirely prepared for all this. It was pretty obvious to everyone, but the news media will use any stick to beat him with.

Romney has now in essence said that the US will not only recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (and thus reject Mr. Obama’s suggestion that the Arab-Israeli negotiations begin with the 1967 boundaries (before Israel’s victories in the 6-day and other wars). Sheldon Adelson was in the audience, and is raising money for Romney. There are a number of implications to this. One is that Romney and Newt Gingrich have a powerful mutual friend. What that means for Newt in the event of a Romney election is not clear, but it may indicate a larger place in space policy for Newt Gingrich – who remains a space cadet. I first met Newt after he read my A Step Farther Out (Kindle edition) and telephoned me because he wanted to discuss it.

Sheldon Adelson is a very astute man, and his ability to put together coalitions of enemies in order to advance causes and institutions he favors should not be underestimated. His wife, Dr. Miriam Ochshorn Adelson, is a graduate of Tel Aviv University.

 

clip_image003

And Mike Flynn, who knows more statistics than anyone I have ever known well other than John Tukey, has this comment:

Muller and BEST

A comment on Dr. Briggs’ "Statistician to the Stars" blog provides the following comments from Dr. Muller of the BEST study:

“I was never a skeptic” – Richard Muller, 2011 “If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008 “There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.” – Richard Muller, 2006 “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

Given these sentiments running back to AD 2003, it seems a bit disingenuous to advertise as a "denier" who has been "converted" by close study of the data. If you go to http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5946 and search the site for "Muller" a number of interesting statistical critiques will reveal themselves.

The problem, as always, is in the homogenization procedures. Such procedures are necessary if one is to convert actual temperature measurements into adjusted measurements that "might have been seen" if only there were not a city where once there were meadows as bucolic as the opening act at the Olympics (or conversely, if the city had always been there). This is a bit like measuring a triangular plot of land and finding that the angles do not add up to 180 deg. The data must be adjusted. The question is how. By some amazing coincidence, in 67% of the cases, the adjusted data show a greater temperature increase than the actual data. In some cases, a declining trend in actual temperatures is, mirabile dictu, transformed into an increasing trend in adjusted temperatures. But given the homogenization procedures used, a stationary series of serially correlated random data will be adjusted into an increasing trend. http://itia.ntua.gr/getfile/1212/1/documents/2012EGU_homogenization_1.pdf

MikeF

Apparently Muller wasn’t quite the Denier that the headlines said he was. As to the homogenization, I have written on that many times: I don’t trust any of the measures enough that I would bet trillions of dollars on them. We know it was warmer in Roman times, we know it was warmer in Viking times, and we know damned well that it was a lot colder during the Little Ice Age. We know that it was colder when England and Scandinavia and much of northern North America were under hundreds to thousands of meters of ice. We have some reliable data from the times of the voyage of the Beagle and more since 1900, and after satellites we began to get really accurate primary data, but there are still anomalies, outages, gaps, missing data…

I know it has warmed in North America since Colonial times. I know we were concerned about Cooling when I was science editor of Galaxy. 

clip_image003

My morning paper headlines that 17,000 people have applied for 300 positions as LA City fire fighters. Is it possible that fire fighters are paid more than would be needed to attract qualified people to the job? But then the California board that governs the investment of pension funds has found itself lucky to make 1% return on those funds, but consistently gives the official estimate for future return at more than 7%. This is known as quality management.

 

clip_image002[8]

I cheerfully acknowledge that I paid no attention to Muller until this incident, and I did pay attention to what appeared to be reasonable statements by mainstream media. That, it turns out, was an error. Here is a good summary:

 

Surprise defection of Muller?

The surprise is that anyone believes this is a defection.

First and foremost, look here http://mullerandassociates.com/government/ . This is a company with Richard Muller , President and Chief Scientist, Elizabeth Muller, CEO. They make the following statements (on a page formerly named GreenGov in Oct 2011) "Energy policy involves economics, energy security, and climate change." and "Coal, as one example, is abundant in some countries, but it is also a strong emitter of carbon dioxide." They made those same statements before this paper was first submitted (2011), and thus supposedly before Muller was "convinced" by the data that humans changed climate. They therefore state that they believe in climate change caused by human produced CO2, and so stated at the same time they were claiming to be "skeptics". They get business and money if climate change is true, and lose money if it is false. They therefore have a serious conflict of interest. Conclusion, they were not at that time and never have been, "skeptics".

Muller enlisted some skeptics and middle of the roaders such as Anthony Watts and Dr. Judith Curry (listed co author), and then released a paper that was different that these people were told it would be, not using their data or input in ways he stated that he would. This was then followed by a media blitz in Oct 2011 which drew criticism from these contributors and co authors since it was released before peer review. This looks like simply getting the "skeptics" on board, or at least getting their names on the paper, to make it look as if Muller is a skeptic or at least is addressing their concerns. It was this first media blitz that claimed that Muller was now no longer a "skeptic" and was convinced by the data that humans changed climate. With the discovery of the above Muller and Associates statement that climate change is true prior to and during his claim of being a "skeptic", it is obvious that that claim was and is false. It looks like a classic "Black Flag" operation, claim to be one thing while actually being another. It is the old tactic "Ally, Neutralize, Destroy", Ally = "I am a fellow skeptic, like you", Neutralize = "Oh look, that data says humans are causing warming", Destroy = "If even I, a fellow skeptic, can see this, you skeptics should give up your skepticism and join the consensus".

This paper has still NOT passed peer review, in fact, at least one of the reviewers, Ross McKitrick, has recommended it not be published, stating "I submitted my review just before the end of September 2011, outlining what I saw were serious shortcomings in their methods and arguing that their analysis does not establish valid grounds for the conclusions they assert. I suggested the authors be asked to undertake a major revision." and then " On March 8 2012 I was asked by JGR to review a revised version of the Wickham et al. paper. I submitted my review at the end of March. The authors had made very few changes and had not addressed any of the methodological problems, so I recommended the paper not be published. I do not know what the journal’s decision was, but it is 4 months later and I can find no evidence on the BEST website that this or any other BEST project paper has been accepted for publication." http://www.rossmckitrick.com/

Listed co author Dr. Judith Curry states "Muller bases his ‘conversion’ on the results of their recent paper. So, how convincing is the analysis in Rohde et al.’s new paper?" followed by "I have made public statements that I am unconvinced by their analysis". http://judithcurry.com/2012/07/30/observation-based-attribution/#more-9238

Meanwhile, there is now evidence that "the data used by Muller to draw these conclusions was unreliable to the point of utter uselessness" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100173174/global-warming-yeah-right/ . This is based on new findings that half of the US temperature change in the last 30 years is caused by bad station siting http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-dismantles-muller-s-best-claims-half-the-warming-trend-artificial . You can see actual photographs of this bad station siting here http://www.surfacestations.org/ , no need to just take their word for it (suggest you look there during off peak hours, traffic has become heavy). Basically, fully 80% of the sites used to take the "official" temperature in the US are stated by the NOAA to be too poorly sited to be used officially, but are used anyway. Most of these sites have serious Urban Heat Island effects causing an artificially high temperature to be registered, these bad readings are then used to "adjust" the data even on well sited stations upwards. The temperatures you have been told about are therefor simply false. The problem will be even worse in other countries where there is even less quality control, and often few stations with temperatures of huge areas of the earth being measured at only a few (usually urban) stations (Siberia for instance). Half of all "official" "world average" temperatures are measured at airports, covered in miles of concrete and of course of necessity being near urban areas, usually surrounded by them Actual paper on this here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al_2012_discussion_paper_webrelease.pdf (PDF), powerpoint overview here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al-station-siting-7-29-12.ppt .

Conclusions:

Richard Muller is not now, and never was, a skeptic, as proven by his companies website.

His "defection" is therefor staged.

"Accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley", mission accomplished.

His paper is stated to be flawed by it’s co author and some of it’s contributors, as well as others.

It has NOT been recommended for publication by peer review, nor has it been published.

Recent studies now show it to be based on flawed data anyway, in addition to the flawed methodology.

Even with all that, Mullers paper shows that over the last 15+ years, CO2 has increased but the temperature has not.

Legatus

Which confirms what we have actually long known about the True Believers in the Global Warming program. Sorry to have wasted so much time on this, but I had mail from a number of you asking about it – apparently the ploy worked well, and got the attention that Muller wanted. No surprises there. And the example confirms what we have known about the Believers for some time.

My thanks to all of you who have taken the trouble to chase this down.

clip_image002[9]

I meant to comment on this earlier.

drought 

Hi Jerry,

The latest hyperventilating on the TV news is about the threat of rising food prices because of the drought, particularly grains and meat.

Perhaps right now isn’t the best time to be burning food (ethanol) in our cars? If Obama can suspend the welfare work requirements (in violation of the black letter of the law), maybe he can suspend the ethanol mandates for a legitimate crisis?

Needless to say, I’m not holding my breath.

Cheers,

Doug=

That was the first thing I thought of after watching a news report on the drought and the coming corn shortage. Burning food is sinful, and a President who orders us to burn food in cars rather than drill for more oil does not have the best interests of the people who have to buy their food as his major goal. When the United States was booming, we could afford this kind of nonsense although I can think of more fun things to waste money on; but in this economy driving up the price of fuel by burning corn while preventing drilling is much worse than a blunder. Yet we continue to do it. As we continue to fund all kinds of nonsense that costs money.

The best thing one can do for giant corporations is to thicken the business environment with regulations requiring compliance specialists; the result is to prevent newcomers from entering the business, thus ensuring that the business will be dominated by the existing giants. We have always known this, and the Republicans know it as well as the Democrats. This regulatory environment has grown ever more complex under each party, but since the unionized public employees tend to vote Democrat it is harder for Democrat leaders to cut back regulations than it is for Republicans. The only remedy to these trends is for the American Middle Class to understand that self government requires that some citizens be willing to be part of the self government, and for others to become part of the governing structure of one of the major parties. Ideally both would be dominated by middle class citizens, as they were at one time. One problem is that we now live in an era in which fami9lies require two incomes. At one time one member of a family would work and the other might have the leisure to participate in politics, at least at a local level. Now that women are liberated and thus have to work it is much harder for the middle class to take part in self government. More on this another time.

We will see rising food prices and we will continue to see the Federal Government requiring us to convert food into automobile fuel at costs higher than the stuff can be sold for without subsidies. The subsidies keep the whole industry going – it would collapse without them, and food would be sold as food in the open market.

And they never catch wise…

clip_image002[9]

I am not a regular reader of Slate and I know no more about this than having read it: but it is disturbing.

Nonetheless, the goal of the “stakeholder engagement event,” as the TPP “Welcome Stakeholders!” packet explained, was to provide an “open and productive forum.” Yet the public knows more about the aggregate numbers of nuclear warheads the United States and Russia have deployed on intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty than it does about U.S. negotiating positions in TPP. Thus, on “openness,” the TPP negotiators and USTR have failed.

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/07/trans_pacific_partnership_agreement_tpp_could_radically_alter_intellectual_property_law.html

 

clip_image002[9]

clip_image004

clip_image002[9]