THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View 142 February 26 - March 4, 2001 |
||
For
Current Mail click here.
Last Week's View Next Week's View This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. (Older columns here.) For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. If you are not paying for this place, click here... For Previous Weeks of the View, SEE VIEW HOME PAGE Search: type in string and press return.
|
||
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here.
Highlights this week:
The atomz Search returns: Search: type in string and press return. The freefind search remains:
|
This week: | Monday
February 26, 2001
Notice repeated from last week: Notice to Subscribers: IF YOU DID NOT get a test mailing recently, PLEASE CHECK BADMAIL page. I have received a surprising number of rejections to this test mailing, some from people with whom I have had recent correspondence. If you're on that badmail page, it is from this recent test mailing, and there is something wrong here. In some cases I may have two addresses, one original and one from a renewal, in which case please tell me which one I can DELETE. I really would like to make this list current... Thanks! There was a lot last week on DVD, Digital Cable, and other such marvels of consumer electronics. I'll do the whole story here later this week as I collect the final outcome. I usually like to have a happy ending to a story but this one doesn't really have one. The bottom line is that if you have digital cable you can't record from one channel while watching another. There are a few tricks that MIGHT let you record from analog cable signals that way but if your cable provider does not bring in both analog and digital then you can't do that. I'm still experimenting to see if Adelphia has both or merely digital. There is much more in current mail. If you lose your remote 1-800-REMOTES will take care of you. It won't be cheap. Have the serial number of your TV and a credit card handy. It takes about a minute and $80 or so... I turned in the AAAS general report to www.byte.com last night. It's pretty good. I will be doing a couple of detailed reports, which will probably go here rather than BYTE but we'll see; clearly they have first choice. The Mote in God's Eye photographed...??? http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/26/donut.dustcloud/index.html Paul Good Grief! It really is! "A new virus has just been discovered that has been classified by Microsoft www.microsoft.com and by McAfee www.mcafee.com as the most destructive ever!" The bottom line here is DO NOT OPEN V CARD ATTACHMENTS until the remedy is posted. I got the above and put it here; better to be safe than sorry. But I have found NOTHING about this anywhere on the net so far. Mcafee doesn't seem to have a headline. Neither does Microsoft. There is an admitted flaw in Microsoft vcard handling that could open the way for a hack, but I know of no one doing it. I think this is a false alarm. Still, better to be aware of it than not. (It is definitely a hoax.) However, it is based on something real. See below. On that score, James Post sends Dr. Pournelle: I have found these sites handy to check against Hoaxes http://vil.mcafee.com/hoax.asp http://www.europe.f-secure.com/virus-info/hoax/ I hope you also find them instructive This is the closest I could find to the Virus you speak of on your site http://www.europe.f-secure.com/hoaxes/vcredit.shtml Bob Thompson adds: see http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/8/17141.html And, of course, it's not a virus, which is why Symantec and McAfee haven't reported it. It's a buffer overrun exploit. As you say, no one has reported being victimized (yet) but the potential certainly exists. -- Robert Bruce Thompson If I get a confirmed virus warning I will send mail notices as well as post here. But I don't do that without confirmation. Meanwhile see http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-012.asp
Roland asks, "Do you believe this?" http://www.navytimes.com/stories/navy_story_229237.html Actually, yes. I saw some films of demos at the directed energy weapons symposium... At the moment we can either shout at them or shoot them when they approach a ship or a base or an embassy. It would be neat to have alternatives. Phasers on stun!
|
This week: | Tuesday, February
27, 2001
Here is an interesting recent photo. The gentleman said "Wie gehts?" to which I replied "Es geht mir gut, und Ihnen?" which seemed to non-plus him. Perhaps my HochDeutsch wasn't comprehensible to a Swiss? Ah well.
The
virus warning yesterday was definitely a hoax. It sounded like one from
the wording. On the other hand, the source, while not on I rely on for
technical advice, is sound, and I thought it best to be safe. Better to
pass along a warning and not need it.
Dear Dr. Pournelle, here's a link to MSFT concerning the Outlook VCard vulnerability, and a patch which purportedly corrects it: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms01-012.asp Gordon.
|
This week: |
Wednesday, February
28, 2001
Ash Wednesday And now there's this to worry about: 27 January 2001 Gnutella Users Warning: Beware of the Mandragore Worm! Cambridge, United Kingdom, January 27, 2001 - Kaspersky Labs, an international data-security software-development company, announces the discovery of a new worm "Mandragore" spreading across the popular Gnutella file exchange network that uses the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) technology. The opportunity for malicious code of this type to exist in a P2P network was discovered in early May 2000 by Seth MacGann, who posted the results of his research to the respected BugTraq electronic conference. Despite almost a one-year passing, not one single malicious code of this virus had been discovered "in-the-wild." Yet, in only a few days since the "Mandragore" has been discovered, Kaspersky Lab has received information pertaining to nearly 20 computers being infected by this very worm. Note that this is part of a press release. Still... BYTE wants my Nanotechnology report, which I will finish today. I'll have a report on another subject for Chaos Manor subscribers. And this: Hard-drive manufacturers are
trying to sneak CPRM in the backdoor: http://cryptome.org/cprm-smoke.htm Pete Flugstad
The manual for the DCT 2000 Motorola Cable box can be found at http://gicout60.gic.gi.com/customer_docs/#user thanks to Dave Bloodgood.
|
This week: |
Thursday,
March 1, 2001 It is sunny again in Los Angeles. Deo Gratia. I have a new Herman Miller chair. I love it. When I gave a talk at an engineering symposium a month or so ago, I went through the corporate offices and was shown the main programmer suite. All of the programmers had Herman Miller chairs. When anyone left the company he had an option to buy his chair -- and every one so far had exercised it. Which told me enough to buy one for me. Niven say it and he wants one. Photo another time. This was not cheap, but I spend a lot of time in these things. I got this email with subject "EEK!": Dr Jerry: Please look at this: "Bush Whacks Space Station" V/R Steven Dunn I expect a number of people will be distressed at this. I am not. The Space Station was an ill-designed nightmare. The US space program desperately needs on-orbit assembly capability. To do that we need space suits that don't require pre-breathing before use. NASA has known this for 20 years, and has had such suit designs available since 1980. I have a signature in my log book of a NASA test subject in a 12 psi above ambient suit, signed after about 6 hours in it, attesting to general comfort. Of course he was a 22 year old rigger not a 45 year old Ph.D. which is what NASA sends up. The whole manned space program is a shambles because we don't have decent suits. Without on orbit assembly capability -- I mean real work in space done by riggers who can do a day's work -- things have to be pre-assembled and taken up in big chunks, which means shuttle which means a BILLION DOLLARS A FLIGHT for 50,000 pounds or so. What we need is 20 million a flight for 10,000 pounds and that would be achievable but "there is no urgent need for that" because -- well because the stupid space station ate it all. The shuttle and the space station ate the dream. Make no mistake about that. Those monsters need to GO and be replaced by smaller, operations driven, flexible re-usable designs. For more on all that see the space section on this web page, and particularly the SSX concept. Note that most of this was written in 1988 and before. In 1989 Gen. Daniel Graham, Max Hunter, and I went to then Chairman of the National Space Council VP Dan Quayle and persuaded him to start a small reusable rocket program. That became the DC/X and the concept was proved with 11 successful USAF flights before NASA took it over and destroyed in on the first flight, thus eliminating any threat to the Shuttle. It's all in the space sections. For more on space see below. BYTE.COM will have my AAAS report up Real Soon Now. I am preparing my nanotechnology report. And it's column time. And I will have a substantive mailing to subscribers, so if you're on the badmail list this is the time to get off it... About a million people including Ginny Heinlein have told me about this, so many that I sort of forgot that everyone won't know: It's about time, says I. Now if I could find a good gif of Don't Give Up The Ship!
There is another long letter regarding The Velikovsky Affair. The new material is at the bottom of the longer discussion. This is a comment on astronomer Morrison's new survey on Velikovsky. For an old man who was dead wrong on most points he has had a lot of influence. And I suspect his shaking the complacency of the establishment was a good thing. X-33 and X-34 are dead. HURRAH. See mail for more. Here's one worth looking at. Implications may be big. I was VERY fond of Intergraph systems. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/17285.html Thanks to Bob Thompson.
|
This week: |
Friday,
March 2, 2001 Notice to Subscribers: IF YOU DID NOT get a test mailing FROM MARCH FIRST 2001 PLEASE CHECK BADMAIL page. I have a new badmail page, with only returns from the March 2001 mailing. If you are a subscriber and did not get the mailing, check badmail; and if you are not there, tell me when you subscribed, how, and what mail address you USED and which one you want NOW (and which is which). I am getting this under control. I think. Space Station is being cut back, X-33 is mercifully ending, and perhaps some sanity and competence will come to the US space program. We have put enough money into it since Apollo to be halfway to Alpha Centauri. Certainly enough to have a Moon Base. What we have is not much. We don't even have decent space suits. So it goes.
|
This week: | Saturday,
March 3, 2001 Thanks to all who subscribed or resubscribed. I have spent the day at Fry's and doing silly things so you won't have to; it will all be in the column. I am also finishing the Nano-technology report. And my AAAS report ought to be up at www.byte.com Monday morning. I have had my first serious and unrecoverable crash of a Windows 2000 Professional system since the final release of W 2000. That too will be in the column; I am still trying to find out how it happened. I hate duplicating problems, but "I do all these silly things so you don't have to," and if I can figure out why it crashed -- my suspicion now is hardware -- then perhaps it can be avoided. W 2000 Pro is pretty stable and I like it.
|
This week: | Sunday,
|