THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View 117 September 4 - 10, 2000 |
||
For
Current Mail click here.
Last Week's View Next Week's View This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. (Older columns here.) For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. If you are not paying for this place, click here... For Previous Weeks of the View, SEE VIEW HOME PAGE Search: type in string and press return.
|
||
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here.
Highlights this week:
The atomz Search returns: Search: type in string and press return. The freefind search remains:
|
This week: | Monday
September 4, 2000
Labor Day: Arise, ye starvelings of the nations, Arise ye prisoner of want, for Reason in revolt now thunders, and thus ends the Age of Cant... The snake has all the lines. Actually we have a few, but we try hard to forget them. "And thus be it ever, when free men shall stand, between their loved homes, and the war's desolation...." But they don't even teach that at West Point any longer, I am told. Wouldn't want people to think about triumphs and just causes, much less the real implications of a land of the free. Actually, the Internationale has probably had as much long term influence as the 4th Verse of the Star Spangled Banner, to give the proper names of the sources of those lines above. Certainly internationalism has replaced patriotism as the prime motive of the US elites. Whether this is as good a thing as the elites seem to think isn't clear to me, but it's very clear that what I think on the subject isn't entirely relevant. If there's one thing both major parties are entirely agreed on, its that international free trade is the major goal of the US and we will pay a lot in both money and political capital to have it; and that nationalist restrictions on ownership of key resources like broadcasting companies, TV stations, mines and minerals, companies with technologies with significant military implication, etc., are old-fashioned and must be discarded, preferably fast. We have already discarded most. We sold the Chinese our operations procedures for learning to control stage separations, which is the key to MIRV technology. Also, I mind one technology company that had capabilities in satellite temperature control and other matters of extreme importance to our satellite observation program. The technologies were so sensitive that it was ruled that the secrets could not be sold to the French: whereupon the French through a government subsidized deal bought the whole company and took it, plant, technology, jobs, and the rest to France. And it was all made legal. Who the French have sold this to isn't entirely clear. It's no longer our business. But Free Trade is important for economic reasons. But I keep asking for some of the numerical analysis of these big advantages of Free Trade given the political realities. I have yet to get a real answer from an economist, so I'll do my own. Take a skilled worker. Call him Joe. He's 50 or so, making perhaps $20 an hour or $40,000 a year plus another $12,000 in benefits. He considers himself middle class, a bit pinched for sending his two teen age kids to school, but he's managing, and has saved some in their college fund. He's a Volunteer fireman, or belongs to a service club. Bit of charity work. The kind of person we think of as 'solid citizen". He pays taxes on his $40,000, say $6,000 a year. His company makes about 10% profit on the $52,000 real costs of this worker, or about $5,200 a year, and pays taxes on that. His job is exported to be done by three prisoners in Qwang Dung Province. Even with transport costs and higher profits and the like the widgets he made still cost less. The company now makes $6,000 a year on those widgets, and sells them for 10% less: that's the benefit to Joe and the rest of us. We get cheaper widgets. Joe now has to find another job. At age 50. Go retrain, he's told. But he spent 10 - 15 years getting good enough to earn $20 an hour at his old job. He hasn't got 10 years to invest this time. With a lot of luck he may manage $12 an hour at the new job after going through most of the college fund and other savings. We'll assume he keeps his house because Susan did some part time work and everyone cut way back on spending. Fortunately the people who run the widget company spend the extra they get so there's been no real effect on net demand for widgets and other such stuff. It's a bit hard on Joe to realize he's no longer middle class and the country doesn't care. Major college is now out for the kids, but perhaps they can work their way through the local college. Weighbelow Normal isn't the best school in the world, but it's a college. Joe isn't paying the kind of taxes he used to pay. Neither is his company which has much of the profit paid through a Cayman Islands bank, but it's careful to stay legal, so it pays some. Joe's attachment to the Land of the Free may be just a bit less now. He has less stake in things. He's a bit more alienated. So are his kids. If Joe's kids don't get alienated entirely with the system and become criminals -- and believe me one historic source of criminals is bourgeois tumbled into the working class, and believe me that kind of criminal is expensive -- and we don't have to subsidize Joe's family's medical (which used to be part of that $12,000 in benefits but he doesn't get that any longer), then Ricardo's principle of comparative advantage may bring about a net benefit to all of us including Qwang Dung Province: but you know, the interesting part is that if you play with Excel spreadsheets and plug in various assumptions about the hidden costs of Free Trade in a highly liberalized -- that is, regulated, subsidized, and not-free economy -- you get some interesting results. Or at least I do. Those medical benefits are only a part of it. But no spread sheet is going to count the real cost of losing a solid middle class citizen, the costs of alienation, and the rest of those hidden political costs. I know that many think we have as much (or as little) obligation to the peasants of Qwang Dung Province as to the mill workers in Pleasanton. I also know that if we need to call on them to defend the country, the peasants of Qwang Dung are not terribly likely to respond. Cato the Elder, when asked why he was opposed to the destruction of the small farms in Central Italy (consolidating those farms and working them with slave labor would have been a lot more efficient, and would have made a lot more money for Cato and the Senatorial class) said "No more peasants, no more Legions." But of course they could and did hire Legions from the displaced peasantry. And thus be it ever when hirelings shall stand between our loved homes and the war's desolation... But the skies are blue, there is a gentle breeze, the column is going well, and I'm for a walk in my hills. Have a good Labor Day.
|
This week: | Tuesday, September
5, 2000
I have known Suzette Haden Elgin since I was President of Science Fiction Writers of America. She was formerly a professor in San Diego. She now lives in a more or less underground house in Arkansas. Her science fiction stories have always been special, which is to say different: the kind of thing that if you like it you like it a lot, but which don't get huge sales. The other night I ran across a story I hadn't intended to read. It's at http://www.forlovingkindness.org and it's not exactly science fiction or fantasy. Whatever it is, I started reading it and got hooked, and ended up sitting here half the night reading on screen, something I do not usually do. Fair warning: this one is special. Some of you are going to hate it. You will find at http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13030.html an article about Amazon's new policy, which looks to me like a formula for suicide; but I don't know enough about the reliability of the report to warrant spending a lot of time responding to it. I have a great deal of hate mail about Amazon as a result of this report. Stand by while I learn more. I'd hate to lose Amazon: they have found me books I would never have found in my local stores. On the other hand, I like the fact that my local stores exist. And don't sell my name to sucker lists But inside that article is a link to Amazon's POLICIES and those do not seem to have changed. Whether they are frightening or not depends I suppose on many things: I don't tell Amazon anything about me you can't find out in Who's Who except what books I am reading, and those you will find here in general; but then I run a daybook web site, so being concerned about privacy is a bit silly in my circumstance. I mean, people who show off for a living or even for the fun of it can hardly object if people then know more about them than they do about their neighbor two houses down. So I don't quite know what to make of all this. I make no doubt many of you will have views... Roland reports: http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2622866,00.html Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@netmore.net>
Which doesn't add much but grounds for speculation. Clearly this is a legal thing: if Amazon is sold, the bid price will be greatly affected by whether or not the customer base ("goodwill" it used to be called) is part of the package. Without this announcement, lawyers could tie things in knots for years and would; nothing can ever be done in the US without satisfying a sufficient number of lawyers without much regard to the sanity of their claims. Thus Amazon makes the announcement. Are they about to sell? They say not, but without this announcement they certainly couldn't. Now, who knows? Meanwhile, the value of their 'goodwill' is lowered considerably by making the announcement that makes it possible to sell their goodwill assets. And so it goes in this hag-ridden land. You will note that the interests of the legal staff of a large corporation are nowhere near identical to the interests of the owners of the corporation. It has not ever been thus, but it is now.
|
This week: |
Wednesday,
September 6, 2000 Finishing column. Techweb broadcast which I just finished. And I have to do a paper for a AAAS Symposium on space. Aida opens the LA Opera series tonight with the great and grand Gala meaning it's black tie this evening. What I would call a full day... Sign of the times. They're selling a Cray for a few thousand bucks. Roland suggested Niven buy one as a party conversation piece. I recall when Ron Cobb and others bought one for millions to make The Last Starfighter with. So it goes. Interesting Addendum to the Fry's story: The General Manager of the Burbank store just called to apologize. Apparently someone read my web site comments. (They would have my telephone number in their records, so that's how they got that.) Now I suspect they don't have the GM call the customer in every case, but they are certainly going to talk to the supervisor involved: it was easy enough for them to discover I do a lot of business with Fry's, and losing a customer over $29.95 (the sticker says $39.99 but my sales slip shows it was discounted the day I bought it) isn't very good business. Leave out that I'm a columnist, which shouldn't make any difference. So perhaps they will be a little less likely to treat customers as criminals. I am not without sympathy for them. They lose a lot to shoplifting and just outright fraud including people trying to set them up for suits for false arrest. I am not sure I have a solution to that. Anyway, they have made my loss good. I am told that the latest Internet Explorer if downloaded and installed takes over, eliminates Outlook Express, and becomes your mail system; if you like it, fine, but if you don't there is no return. Anyone have experience on this?
(SEE MAIL. It could be important!)
|
This week: |
Thursday,
September 7, 2000 LA Opera Gala opening last night. Met a charming couple. Stacey is the reviewer for the US West Coast for the London Financial Times. I don't read that paper, but I she sure sounded like she has good sense. Her husband John is an artist in the same line as David Em and perhaps I can get them together sometime which might be interesting. The opera was Aida and it was a mixed bag. The singing was terrific. Some of the acting was good. The lead cannot act, and to say she doesn't look the part is being charitable. The staging was mixed as well: it's the Houston production so there wasn't a lot we could do, but fitting it onto our stage was, uh, tricky. The chorus was wonderful as usual. Los Angeles as the best opera chorus in the world, in large part because we have so much employment for vocalists and musicians in Hollywood. Same with the dance troupe: the two ballets in Aida are often not done well, but these were splendid. The gala dinner was as good as I've ever been to. I suspect that the absence of the usual opening night Hollywood Glitterati was a good thing: they never come to anything else, they always soak up all the attention, and they always leave early en masse. Tonight they weren't here at all, and it was a much nicer party.
Column time but I have a speech tonight so I probably won't get it done until late. Russell Kay, my old associate from BYTE days, has a very interesting piece on Microsoft Reader. As you may know he and I have been enthusiastic about Reader's capabilities. Now, alas... http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47-68-84-91_STO49358,00.html And see MAIL from Clark Myers about Microsoft Explorer and your email and such: it's important.
|
This week: |
Friday,
September 8, 2000 I am late on my column. And other stuff. Here's something to think about using machine translation: English to German to English: If, in the process of of the human cases, it becomes necessary for people to resolve the political the linkages which permit it with others and under the energies of the mass, which it attached to assume different and same station to which the laws of nature and the God of nature to them, an acceptable respect needs them for the opinions of mankind that they should explain the causes, for the separation impel.
|
This week: | Saturday,
On the Gripping Hand: LA Times - June 1 1998 In California, more than 600 soon-to-be lawyers were taking the State Bar exams in the Pasadena Convention Center when a 50 year old man taking the test suffered a heart attack. Only two of the 600 test takers, John Leslie and Eunice Morgan, stopped to help the man. They administered CPR until paramedics arrived, then resumed taking the exam. Citing policy,the test supervisor refused to allow the two additional time to make up for the 40 minutes they spent helping the victim. Jerome Braun, the state Bar's senior executive for admissions, backed the decision stating "If these two want to be lawyers, they should learn a lesson about priorities."
|
This week: | Sunday,
September 10, 2000 Whew. The column is done and on the way to Tokyo and Boston. That one was tougher than most. We had two opera openings this week. I'll try to get up some from the grand opening of Aida. This is from Centerentola -- Cinderella in English -- or at least the opening night party. The opera is delightful and if you live in Southern California do not miss it. It's pure fun. Above we have Roberta Pournelle and Ed Clark. Ed was once Libertarian candidate for President, mostly this is a great picture of Roberta. I have a lot of mail but I may not get it up until tomorrow.
|