THE VIEW FROM CHAOS MANOR View December 6 - 12, 1999 Refresh/Reload Early and Often! |
|
For
Current Mail click here.
This is a day book. It's not all that well edited. I try to keep this up daily, but sometimes I can't. I'll keep trying. See also the monthly COMPUTING AT CHAOS MANOR column, 4,000 - 7,000 words, depending. (Older columns here.) For more on what this place is about, please go to the VIEW PAGE. If you are not paying for this place, click here... For Previous Weeks of the View, SEE VIEW HOME PAGE Search: type in string and press return.
|
|
For an index
of previous pages of view, see VIEWDEX. See also the New Order page, which tries to make order of chaos. These will be useful. For the rest, see What is this place? for some details on where you have got to.
If you subscribed: If you didn't and haven't, why not? For the BYTE story, click here. The LINUX pages are organized as the log, my queries, and your responses and advice parts one, two, three, and four. There's four pages because I try to keep download times well under a minute. There are new updates to four. Highlights this week:
|
This week: | Monday
December 6, 1999
Pair.com has moved its headquarters, and we were off line for about 4 hours. Amazing. They did a splendid job, and everything seems to be working and fast. There was some problem over the weekend but I make no doubt it was all due to having all their people involved in moving things. It seems to have gone very smoothly. Congratulations, and if you need a web hosting service I can recommend this one. Tomorrow morning I go down to the BLUETOOTH technical convention to give out the BYTE.COM Best of Show Awards for COMDEX Fall 99; Bluetooth won for best technology, and while there were 5 companies in the consortium when we gave the award, there are now 10 and they all want certificates.... Now we know why you can't get to Mars... Faster! Better! Cheaper! Thanks to David Vesey
|
This week: | Tuesday, December
7, 1999
Gave the Best Technology awards at the Bluetooth Developers conference this morning.
|
This week: |
Wednesday,
December 8, 1999 Finishing the column. I'm a little late... I have been running DVD movies on Parsifal with an ATI Rage Fury 128 video board and the ATI DVD player software. Works just fine. However, I now have an Hitachi DVD-RAM and DVD-ROM player installed in a system with an Intel SR-440 BX motherboard that has an nVidia TNT video board. The ATI player software sees that there is a DVD movie disk in there, and opens; it trundles; and it says "Play cannot proceed" and has no way to start the movie. The same program plays the same disk just fine over on Parsifal without any hardware decoders.. I am assuming that the problem is the player software. Since the system is a Pentium III/550 I have plenty of processor power, and I would prefer a software decoder. Hitachi recommends a hardware decoder, and I can certainly buy one of those if that's what it needed. What should I do? Suggestions welcome. Indeed, if there are any experts out there on video boards and DVD decoders, I'd appreciate as much as you are willing to tell me...
|
This week: |
Thursday,
December 9, 1999 I suppose I should have made it clear that I thought the Intel motherboard in New Squirrel was an ATI Rage Pro (as it is on the MSI board in BIG SYS), so it wasn't quite so foolish to expect the ATI player to work. I later learned that what's in the Intel is a different maker video entirely.
Long time subscriber Claude Addicott, Jr., reminds me that I have a Creative decoder card in Parsifal. It's not needed there. The ATI DVD software with the ATI Rage Fury 128 board takes care of all that in software. I should, however, be able to move it to the New Squirrel machine so that I can do DVD on that one. Of course I don't really need DVD on more than one machine, and New Squirrel has an Hitachi DVD-RAM disk drive, 2.6 gigabytes of removable storage, much faster than tape. It also plays DVD ROMS such as DeLorme Topo nicely. There is a lot more mail about modern armor and military, and I am tempted to collect all this stuff on a different page. Alternatively I could make pointers everywhere but that isn't easy. I have moved the military debates to alt mail. Previously posted were left up. I hate the web and this page. Between Pair.com, FrontPage, and ws_ftp95 there is a conspiracy to see that nothing I do with this place is simple. It began when I decided to try to move a bunch of mail and view files to an archive folder. The notion was to do that and if that worked try to make a sub-web out of the archives. Hah. Double hah. Stupid stupid stupid. First there are a lot of links so it takes about an hour to move ten pages of mail or view anywhere. Finally that is done and I try to publish. Foo. After a few seconds or a few minutes while FrontPage tries to make files and figure out what to do, Pair.com kills the connection so that I get the report that we cannot find a web at 216 etc etc. If I try to do it all with ftp, among other things ftp insists on putting its reports on top of what I am doing. Every time. And you cannot create new stuff or move stuff in ftp because that drives FrontPage crazy. And the execrable FrontPage does not save its work. There is nothing accumulated about it. Each time it must start over. And no sooner did I post that rant than I tried once more and everything worked just fine: so smoothly that I begin to wonder if FrontPage isn't quietly saving its work between interruptions? I don't know. I do know it all worked yet again. I am moving early mail and view to archives/archivemail/ and archives/archiveview/ with the notion of one day making the whole archives folder a sub-web; that way FP won't ever look at it unless I explicitly tell it to, or so I believe. There is precious little -- really NO -- documentation on sub webs in FP 2000. I don't know how they work and I don't know how to find out. It sounds as if they will do the job nicely, but how can I find it out?
|
This week: |
Friday,
December 10, 1999 This is my day to take my wife to lunch so there's nothing this morning. I owe Jay Ashworth an apology. His letter was well intentioned, and I reacted to it as one of a series. The irony was that I posted his because it was articulate and in good English, which most of the others were not, but I ended up writing a reply that was more meant for someone else than him. My apologies.
|
This week: | Saturday,
December 11, 1999 This system is shutting down, said the message. Save all your work. It gave me about a minute. The message came spontaneously, from "Win NT Authority" and it did just that. I had time to save. This is Windows NT Professional RC 2 (I have 3 but it is not yet installed on this system). Nothing seemed to be wrong before that message and nothing is wrong now. Does anyone know what is happening? I seem to have a plethora of explanations, none of which make sense to me. It hasn't happened again and I am about to scrub this system and install W 2000 RC3 so I guess I will never know...
|
This week: | Sunday, December
12, 1999 From another place: The following is a slightly edited version of --- Sams Teach Yourself the Internet in Ten Minutes 2nd Edition by Galen Grimes isn't a book any of you need, but if you want to give a book to Aunt Minnie to get her started, this is a good one. It's short and easy to understand. The official story: You've probably been sent a few versions of this (though it is much less common than than the original story), but just in case you haven't... This particular message was forwarded by someone to the sfconsim (i.e. science fiction wargame) mailing list, in response to the posting of the original story. > > ---------- > > From: Grisogono, Anne-Marie > > Sent: Monday, July 12, 1999 5:26:05 PM > > To: LOD All > > Subject: official reply to virtual kangaroo emyth > > Auto forwarded by a Rule > > >Hi everyone > >Apparently this e-myth has been rebounding to some of you, so here is the >official reply. >Please feel free to send on to any of your correspondents. . . and >apologies >to anyone who has been inconvenienced by it. > >This story has gone around the globe a few times I reckon. It's been >discussed in Parliament, reported on in the press, and keeps being >forwarded >to me from all corners. Anyway, here below is the answer I send anyone who >asks about it. Now I know how e-myths arise and evolve! > >Regards >Anne-Marie > >============================= > >It's probably too late to recall and correct the story (it's already been >forwarded to me by several different sources) but since you ask, here is >the >kernel of truth in it: >I related this story as part of a talk on Simulation for Defence, at the >Australian Science Festival on May 6th in Canberra. >The Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter mission simulators built by the >Synthetic Environments Research Facility in Land Operations Division of >DSTO, do indeed fly in a fairly high fidelity environment which is a 4000 >sq >km piece of real outback Australia around Katherine, built from elevation >data, overlaid with aerial photographs and with 2.5 million realistic 3d >trees placed in the terrain in those areas where the photographs indicated >real trees actually exist. >For a bit of extra fun (and not for any strategic reason like kangaroos >betraying your cover!) our programmers decided to put in a bit of animated >wildlife. Since ModSAF is our simulation tool, these were modelled on [That's Modular Semi-Automated Forces--units controlled by the computer using game-quality AI--Brian] >ModSAF's Stinger detachments so that the associated detection model could >be >used to determine when a helo approached, and the behaviour invoked by such >contact was set to 'retreat'. Replace the visual model of the Stinger >detachment in your stealth viewer with a visual model of a kangaroo (or >buffalo...) and you have wildlife that moves away when approached. It is >true that the first time this was tried in the lab, we discovered that we >had forgotten to remove the weapons and the 'fire' behaviour. It is NOT >true >that this happened in front of a bunch of visitors (American or any other >flavour). We dont normally try things for the first time in front of an >audience! >What I didnt relate in the talk is that since we were not at that stage >interested in weapons, we had not set any weapon or projectile types, so >what the kangaroos fired at us was in fact the default object for the >simulation, which happened to be large multicoloured beachballs. >I ususally conclude the story by reassuring the audience that we have now >disarmed the kangaroos and it is again safe to fly in Australia. >well, now you know.... >:-) >Anne-Marie >Dr Anne-Marie Grisogono >Head, Simulation >Land Operations Division >DSTO > >PO Box 1500 >Salisbury 5108 >South Australia > >ph +618 8259 6532 >fx +618 8259 5055 > Evan Powles epowles@peninsula.starway.net.au
|